I don't know how they do this, but it seems like they condition the LLM to not use real-world knowledge. Or as little as possible, maybe for the article titles only.

I tried it with a few real-world things and it correctly hallucinated.

It's a feature, prompt tells the LLM to always invent new meanings to existing terms

[dead]

Plan 9/9front's bullshit(1) tool works kinda like these but without requiring an $6k machine.

Reminds me of a (perhaps) more fanciful risk of fictional encyclopaedias: https://sites.evergreen.edu/politicalshakespeares/wp-content...

Actually interesting response. You can also check out github.

@bstrama, maybe you can have a process running that just iterates through the titles of different pages, and deletes the bad ones?

p.s. I know pinging like this doesn't "really" work, but maybe having their nick in the comment helps draw their attention