Posted by david-gpu 1 day ago
Very effective tactic. Only solution is to ignore all non local stuff until just before elections.
Me? I'd rather just keep reading through mentions of Trump in the Epstein files.
Colbert and Jon Stewart are more my flavor. Shame Colbert is coming to an end.
Always has been, at least since 1947.
- Trump-related political posts
- China-related political posts
- Iran-related political posts
- DOGE-related political posts
- RFK-Jr-related political posts
- Covid-19 related posts
- Economy-related political posts
- Election-related political posts
- Anti-Russia/anti-"nazi" political posts
My oh my, with that post history, I surely trust you to decide for us what's "propaganda' and what's not. Surely you yourself aren't a huge propaganda account.
I still can't wrap my head around the fact that the guy who made his campaing on ending wars the first thing he does after being elected changes the name from DoD to DoW and starts new wars.
But he didn't. That requires congressional action. The DoW is just a "secondary" name attached via executive order. Contracts still say DOD. The only reason people are saying "DoW" it is to appease certain forceful personalities.
I do wish there was even more resistance though, war has been effectively pitched as costless or even as a boon. Perhaps if this war bites there will be more resistance to future wars. At the very least the Iran war being such a disaster may have saved us from a more costly war with China - which the US was and in some ways still is gearing up for.
Where did I do that? There's no one to vote for that doesn't wage war.
But to say voting for Trump was voting for less war is plain ridiculous. You'd have to ignore his entire career. He is famously fickle, is not shy about lying, and abandons friends at the soonest opportunity. A rational person hearing him say "I will end the Ukraine war on day 1" would understand he's saying whatever he thinks sounds good.
Like you'd think Americans would have learned after "read my lips, no new taxes" even if they somehow memory-holed Trump's entire first administration. But I guess not.
Is there actually a term for every discussion about something code related turning into a debate about LLMs, just increasing the signal to noise ratio on the topic at hand?
I'll throw 'second order AI slop' into the ring.
Having standards? I'm an American taxpayer, this slop is being published on my dime.
I don't know if I'd want to drive on it.
I miss the days when 18F made bespoke sites from scratch.
It's a distraction, a means to control the narrative. That's it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_UFO_Museum_and_R...
I guess that’s what “Unexplained Areal Phenomena” means.
As for US firing missiles at children, that Tomahawk hitting the all girls school had a strike package on record which would detail its intended target.
He's not hiding any of it. Masquerade is a bit rich.