Posted by Eswo 2 days ago
........
...Q....
........
........
.....Q..
........
........
Q..B..Q.
Q.......
........
........
........
..QQB..Q
........
........
........
My original intuition was to place the queens on unique rows and columns to cover as much as possible but it turns out there are solutions with three of them on the same row.Python script: https://gist.github.com/dllu/698d5f71b2b9735c5c462ddf4a2f6fc...
Here's how it works:
0. precompute the attack patterns of each possible queen/bishop location as a bitmask, stored as an integer
1. generate candidate solutions, allowing attack rays to pass through other pieces, by brute forcing the positions of the 5 pieces and taking the bitwise OR of their attacks
2. out of the candidate solutions, check which ones are actually valid taking into account occlusion. Actually, you only need to check if the queen's horizontal attack is blocked by the bishop, as queens cannot block each other (the blocking queen herself has the same attacks so they effectively pass through each other).
........
Q..B..Q.
........
........
.......Q
........
........
...Q....
Where the bishop lies at the intersection of three queens' horizontal attacks. With these queens, no other bishop placement works.The key was realizing the proximal spaces next to the placed queen are the most important to cover. Forget about trying to have a long reach, it comes naturally.
That last word should be "check". not "checkmate". A king next to an unprotected queen will be in check but not checkmate as it can capture the queen.
However let us suppose that you can place it on the board and have it be in either check or checkmate.
If it has been placed on the board and it is in check, since it cannot move into check it follows that it is the king's move. If it can move out of check by taking a piece or another way of moving it is not in checkmate, this seems a pretty weird trick then, because it is not so interesting that you can place the king on the board and it will be in check and it is the king's move to get out of check.
If it can get out of check by taking an unprotected queen then it is again not very interesting, and why would I not just put the king on one of those positions and take the queen from the first.
If I cannot put it on the board without it being in checkmate, it must mean that the placing it on the board is itself the move, and you cannot move into checkmate, but if placing it on the board is the move then it follows you can take a queen with that move if you can place the king anywhere on the board.
The phrasing of the puzzle is inadequate, it seems.
A real shame, this totally ruined the puzzle for me as it seemed so unlikely that all five Black pieces would be mutually protected. I should have forced myself to ignore the faulty clause and try to solve without it. The bad clause is also completely unnecessary - one of those cases where deleting text (or code!) is an improvement with no downside!
I think this is a bit ambiguous and, strictly speaking, wrong for the solution as given.
In particular, this asks for the king to be in check _mate_. Does this require all black pieces to defend each other? Otherwise, white king on the board would not be in checkmate if you place it next to a queen and can immediately capture.
From the solution, you can see it's not a checkmate requirement, just a check requirement.
In fact, there isn’t really a need for two colors. Just color the squares that are threatened by the pieces and leave the rest blank. The meaning will be obvious.
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . Q
. . B . . . . .
. . . . . Q . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . Q . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. Q . . . . . . . B . . . . . .
. . . . . . Q .
. . . B . . . .
Q . . . . . . .
. . . . . B . .
. . Q . . . . .
. . . . . . . B
. . . . Q . . .Also a click on a square could auto place a queen and a second click would swap to the bishop. Every click could auto-check.
A separate discovery mode could start blocking out the squares visually as you place pieces. For a lot of people, that would be easier than the mental representation.