1. English food is not really food, should not be included. :)
2. 11 sources is nowhere near close to "all of human cooking"..
antirez 8 hours ago||
Odd not including French and Italian recipes.
TripleH 8 hours ago||
As soon as you start adding our beloved french recipes, frogs, snails and other oddities might substantially increase the 1,790 ingredients count
walthamstow 8 hours ago|||
French and Italian languages. There are many recipes from both cuisines written in English which, I assume, will have been included.
antirez 7 hours ago||
Indeed, but I bet many were never translated.
Moosdijk 7 hours ago||
it's a clickbait title
suddenlybananas 9 hours ago||
I don't see why the title needs to be quite so grandiose.
muragekibicho 9 hours ago|
It's an appeal to the attention economy. "All of human cooking compressed into 2 MB" is(mentally) palatable relative to "Navigating the Emergent Geometry of Food Ingredient Embeddings".
Getting you to click is the ultimate goal.
subscribed 7 hours ago|||
Should be downvoted/flagged and buried.
system2 2 hours ago||
BS Title. 30 pages of summary is not all human cooking.