Top
Best
New

Posted by HelloUsername 8 hours ago

DuckDuckGo search saw 28% more visits after Google said people love AI mode(www.pcgamer.com)
627 points | 314 commentspage 7
partiallypro 6 hours ago|
AI snippets are just terrible, I always just scroll past it. I want to find the website I'm looking for, if I wanted to use AI I'd open up an AI app or website.
jmyeet 6 hours ago||
If you want to use DDG then go for it. Let people enjoy things, I say. But let's not pretend DDG is suddenly surging, or even relevant really. It's a niche service largely for virtue-signaling by people who insist that "Google sucks". That's their core demographic.

Some Googling claims DDG gets 145M searches per day and claims Google gets ~14B. Well, 14B translates to ~162k QPS. I know for a fact that Google's traffic is significantly higher than that so I'm not sure where that claim comes from.

I honeslty don't believe a significant percentage of Google users even know Sundar made a statement about people loving AI mode or would even care, one way or the other. This is just more marketing fluff trying to will DDG growth into existence.

shevy-java 7 hours ago||
I am trying to find a replacement for google search.

DuckDuckGo was also useless. Qwant just copy/pastes Google's awful UI.

We kind of see that all search engines suck now, but in many cases there is no real reason why that should be the case. For instance, why did Qwant copy/paste Google's horrible UI? There is no logical reason for this other than trying to bait in people who like the Google search UI. I don't like that UI Google chose since like 10 years or more; Google ruined its search engine already way before AI.

We really need a search engine that works and isn't control by a greedy, Evil adCompany. DDG isn't the answer; neither is Qwant.

wetpaws 6 hours ago|
[dead]
yieldcrv 7 hours ago||
0.1% to 0.128% is 28% as well
cute_boi 7 hours ago||
The problem with DDG is they don't have their own infra like brave and rely so much on bing...
jraph 6 hours ago|
Yeah, there's no really good option in the search engine space.
noncoml 7 hours ago||
DuckDuckGo have to change their brand name if they want non-technical people to take them seriously
Hugsbox 7 hours ago||
This has been my issue with DuckDuckGo from the start... it needs to be something a little more catchy and that rolls off the tongue. Saying "I'll DuckDuckGo it" feels so clunky. As small of a gripe as it sounds like, it really does matter.
tredre3 4 hours ago|||
But none of Google's alternative sound any better.

I'll bing it.

I'll brave it.

I'll ecosia it.

I'll kagi it.

I'll startpage it.

I'll yandex it.

Okay "I'll brave it" does sound fine, especially in our brave new world, but it's still ambiguous when speaking it.

jraph 6 hours ago||||
No need to turn a brand into a verb for this.

You look it up.

meatmanek 4 hours ago||
I still use google as a verb even though I use Kagi.
yegg 7 hours ago|||
Duck it.
jraph 6 hours ago||
Mind the F being dangerously close to the D on most keyboards here :-)
clownpenis_fart 7 hours ago||
[dead]
notepad0x90 8 hours ago||
I'll have to see Google's stats as well. I went the other way leaving DDG for google AI mode. I use ddg still if I just want it to find a site. if I want answers, I use Google.

I would say it's more than visits that count, how many people are staying in the DDG or Google home page doing things? a lot more with Google I'd think. they've succeeded in trapping me in their product, instead of navigating away, and I'm happier for it. And... i still don't get what people's problem is (quality wise that is), you don't have to use AI results right, and it's pretty obvious what the AI interaction portion of the page is? I'm sure ad blocker extensions can remove it entirely as well. DDG's quality is not just lower, it requires me clicking around to get AI assisted summary.

I just don't get it, is people's time not valuable? even if half the time the AI results are wrong, it offsets (for me - and it's more like 5%) the time I waste clicking on random sites, some of them ad-trodden (where a blocker isn't available), outdated,etc.. and I usually don't even go to the second page of the result where as the AI reviews more than the first page or two to give me a summary. I'm saving lots and lots of time, getting more done with it.

This is tech, not religion, but it feels like people are conflating the two. it's just a tool that's used to search things.

pjmlp 6 hours ago||
Yeah, nowadays it is a tragedy to find anything useful on the first results page.
d--b 7 hours ago||
maybe AI agents prefer duckduckgo?
Legend2440 8 hours ago|
Both statements can be true, you know.

Some people can love AI mode while others hate it.

huflungdung 8 hours ago|
[dead]
More comments...