Top
Best
New

Posted by Wirbelwind 9 hours ago

Show HN: Continue? Y/N: A 60-second game about AI agent permission fatigue(llmgame.scalex.dev)
183 points | 92 commentspage 3
kqr 6 hours ago|
Fun! Played twice and refused all dangerous commands, with only one "over-block". Although I disagree that saying no to `kill $(lsof -t -i:3000)` is over-blocking. It's such a simple command I'd rather run it myself and be fully aware of what process I'm killing.
graphememes 3 hours ago||
Pressed 1 for everything, no regrets
sandeepkd 5 hours ago||
Interestingly I kept saying no to everything and some how I am a security conscious rare engineer who actually read the commands. Guess doing nothing is the safest approach from security standpoint.
sukhavati 5 hours ago||
Reminds me of the "Papers, please" game. Glory to Arstotzka!
martin-adams 4 hours ago||
Very fun. I can only imagine building this with Claude and testing needed a bit of mental concentration.
NewJazz 5 hours ago||
git reset --soft HEAD~1

Uh, how is this an overblock? It is literally a destructive command. No way I want an LLM agent rewriting my commit history. What if that commit was already pushed to a protected branch?

stratos123 4 hours ago|
Why do you call it destructive? It rewrites history only locally and reversibly (the disappeared commit is still in reflog and can be recovered with another reset) and also doesn't destroy uncommitted changes, so it's quite safe. You can only lose data with it by resetting an unpushed commit and then waiting long enough to let the unreferenced commit be garbage collected.
NewJazz 4 hours ago||
Commit history is data. I might not realize what happened until the gc happens.
misbau 6 hours ago||
That was fun and gave me an idea how security conscious I am.
stevenalowe 4 hours ago||
Sadly unplayable - gray text on a black background is very hard to read on a phone
bspammer 6 hours ago||
To be realistic, 99% of the time it should be a totally innocuous command. If half of the commands are dangerous then you don't get fatigue because you're aware what you're doing is dangerous.
sevenseacat 6 hours ago|
Continue? Y/N ── SCORE: 2,343 Security-Conscious Engineer

Caught 8/8 threats "Not a single secret leaked"

→ llmgame.scalex.dev

neogodless 4 hours ago|
Continue? Y/N ── SCORE: 1,549 Security-Conscious Engineer

Caught 3/3 threats "Not a single secret leaked"

So are there 3 threats? 8? Is it a different game?

Does everyone get a "good" score even if they missed 5 threats?!

t-writescode 3 hours ago||
It's a game you play over one minute. They probably saw more prompts than you.
More comments...