Top
Best
New

Posted by speckx 1 day ago

New method turns ocean water into drinking water, without waste(www.rochester.edu)
460 points | 194 comments
ajb 1 day ago|
There is a fundamental minimum amount of energy needed to desalinate: you can't take less energy to do it,than you could gain back (from osmotic pressure) if you allowed the desalinated water to expand a cylinder containing the residual brine. This is large. This paper is a thermal method, so it doesn't have an electricity input, but to justify their efficiency claim, they should really compare against what you could do by using the same surface area for solar panels, driving a conventional setup. My (limited) understanding is that conventional reverse osmosis is not far from the theoretical optimum, energy-wise, the main difficulties being operational (the membranes need declogging). And of course RO is more expensive than rain.

This paper is interesting, however, in directly producing crystalline salt, which is lower volume than brine and easier to dispose of, maybe even valuable.

patates 2 hours ago||
I always thought that if separating water and salt were easy, our bodies would have evolved to do it so that we'd be able to drink sea water and be fine. It must have been so expensive that searching for fresh water was worth it or there were plenty of fresh water that it was never a evolutionary pressure. Evolving kidneys capable of concentrating urine beyond 3 something percent concentration (sea water) perhaps required a massive restructuring of our internal organs and a huge constant energy expenditure, so we kept seeking fresh water.

ps. I have no clue what I'm talking about

Tagbert 22 minutes ago|||
It’s mostly that it takes energy. If fresh water is we drink that. There aren’t a lot of places where only salt water is available so, for most animals, it isn’t worth it to have evolved a way to extract water from salt water.

Animals in the ocean of course do live without fresh water. Some of them just live off of water extracted directly from their food or from metabolizing that food, which produces water. Some animals have specialized cells that excrete salt so that can take in salt water and separate out the salt.

blackoil 27 minutes ago|||
Salt water fish can process sea water, no point in evolving for saltier brine if you have oceans of 3% water.
otterdude 18 hours ago|||
Thermal methods require energy, it seems like this substrate is effective at maintaining its solar-thermal absorbing properties better than a material that will attract salts

> Testing their solar-thermal desalination technique using samples of water from the Pacific, Atlantic, and Indian Oceans, Guo and his team were able to make the surface self-cleaning. In other words, it extracted freshwater and directed the remaining salts to the passive region where they could be later collected without reducing the panel’s efficiency.

This is not "large" this is a moderate improvement. Albedo is likely only marginally affected, and the solar power input over area is the same.

Depending on this cost of this process it could very likely be a wash in terms of NPV

CuriouslyC 22 hours ago|||
If this can be applied to mine effluent, you could replace the maybe with most certainly. Sulfuric acid effluent lakes leech all sorts of valuable metals out of the ground.
cornholio 11 hours ago|||
Focusing on pure energy efficiency might be missing the point of economic efficiency.

An RO desalination plant needs electric energy to drive the pumps, which might be generated by panels which are 15-20% efficient. So, if you can have cheap thermal desalination panels, they come out ahead even if 6x less energy eficient, you avoid the whole expensive and fragile desalination plant and you gain a low skill, distributed setup.

ajb 7 hours ago||
This is valid for some use cases, but then it needs to be compared with other solar distillation methods, of which there are already a variety at different levels of energy efficiency, complexity, and land use.
westurner 3 hours ago|||
ScholarlyArticle: "Extreme salt-resisting multistage solar distillation with thermohaline convection" (2023) https://www.cell.com/joule/fulltext/S2542-4351(23)00360-4 .. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=7551078272963689346...

"Desalination system could produce freshwater that is cheaper than tap water" (2023) https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1002811

ScholarlyArticle: "Highly efficient and salt rejecting solar evaporation via a wick-free confined water layer" (2022) https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-28457-8

"Solar-powered system offers a route to inexpensive desalination" (2022) https://news.mit.edu/2022/solar-desalination-system-inexpens...

xhkkffbf 1 hour ago||
I remember the MIT press release. I wonder if they've found any commercial success.
xyzzyz 22 hours ago|||
Brine is very easy to dispose of: you just pump it back to where it came from. Solid crystalline salt, on the other hand, is a hassle.
ceejayoz 21 hours ago|||
> Brine is very easy to dispose of: you just pump it back to where it came from.

Easy, but not necessarily good for the spot you're pumping concentrated salt back into.

ashdksnndck 18 hours ago|||
If you use fat pipes that go a decent distance from shore, diluting your brine with ocean water, you’ll have a negligible impact on the ocean. The problem is if you dump lots of brine in shallow waters. Old designs did have that flaw, but it’s not that difficult to design around this constraint now that we know about it.

IMO this is an issue where NIMBYs are using environmental concerns as a smokescreen to block new desal plants from ruining the vibe at their beachfront property. Rhymes with the opposition against offshore wind farms.

iamjs 3 hours ago|||
The city of Corpus Christi, TX is currently considering options for desalination plants—all of which pump their brine into the shallow water inside the bay or the ship channel.
Someone 10 hours ago||||
> The problem is if you dump lots of brine in shallow waters. Old designs did have that flaw, but it’s not that difficult to design around this constraint now that we know about it.

I think that problem was known (and discarded as not important) when the first serious water desalination plants were built.

xp84 12 hours ago||||
I can probably be convinced pretty easily with some evidence of that, but you’ll never convince the contingent who is convinced it’ll kill sea life at any concentration or location, so, being able to shut them up by saying “we have no wastewater, we load rail cars with crunchy salt and use it for stuff” still has value.
__MatrixMan__ 1 hour ago|||
I wish we could reimagine carbon credits to that degree of stringency. You offset a kg of carbon emissions? Let's see that kg.
kortilla 10 hours ago|||
The goalposts will just shift to attack that excess salt instead. It’s like all of the FUD about datacenter water usage while people shove almonds in their mouths.
nkmnz 6 hours ago||
In Germany, it's the water usage of a Tesla plant vs. the neighboring asparagus farm.
FartyMcFarter 14 hours ago||||
Yeah. Worrying about salt in the sea is like worrying about oxygen in the air. Can too much oxygen in the air sometimes be a problem? Yeah, in some corner cases. Is it a major problem that we can't solve? Not at all.
0xFF0123 9 hours ago|||
Isn't it more akin in this case to worrying about too much carbon dioxide in the air?
FartyMcFarter 9 hours ago||
Why is it akin to that? Doesn't the salt come from the sea in the first place?
ceejayoz 5 hours ago||
A more apt comparison than you realize.

Most of the carbon we spew into the atmosphere came from the air. Ancient plants took it in via respiration.

FartyMcFarter 5 hours ago||
That still doesn't make it a good comparison. The salt emitted by desalination plants is already in the sea now, it's not salt that went somewhere else.
parineum 2 hours ago||
And the water we take out eventually goes back.
mejutoco 11 hours ago||||
That makes sense to me. At the same time I know the mediterranean sea is heating up more because it cannot move heat out quick enough. I dont know of any mediterranean air, so I believe more closed water zones would behave different than, lets say, the atlantic ocean.
eff-nix 14 hours ago|||
[dead]
analog31 1 hour ago||||
Someone tell me why this is stupid, which it probably is: Put the desalination plant on a tanker ship and let it do its duty out in the middle of the ocean, then cruise back to port and dispense the water.
SoftTalker 21 hours ago||||
The brine came from the ocean. So just dilute it back to close to ambient salinity using municipal waste water that you are discharging anyway.
ceejayoz 21 hours ago|||
> The brine came from the ocean.

Sure, and enriched uranium comes from the ground, but that doesn't mean it's safe to dump it back in after the enrichment process!

> So just dilute it back to close to ambient salinity using municipal waste water…

Wouldn't it generally be easier to process that municipal waste water, as is already fairly common?

Joker_vD 19 hours ago|||
> Sure, and enriched uranium comes from the ground

Uranium can also come from the ocean water (there is, apparently, quite a lot of it in there, relatively speaking). Japan experimented with the technology in the nineties, but it really was much cheaper to just mine it from the ground, so they abandoned it.

somenameforme 10 hours ago|||
It's about 3 parts per billion. Uranium is about $85/pound, so you'd need to be able to completely process/extract about 40 million gallons of saltwater for $85 to break even. The real cost there is orders of magnitude higher. It's one reason the claim about the Earth having vast amounts of uranium is quite disingenuous. The amount of cost efficient accessible uranium is only enough to last ~1 century at current consumption rates. If nuclear energy scaled up significantly, we'd run out in a matter of decades if not less, or we send the price of uranium skyrocketing and the price arguments would need to be significantly adjusted.
numpad0 18 hours ago|||
Japan is also barred from doing own enrichment, being a non-nuclear state. Though, there nevertheless is a dormant set of requisite facilities.
redsocksfan45 14 hours ago||
You're wrong. Japan does do their own enrichment, 150k SWUs at Rokkasho with plans to bring that up to 500k SWUs a year soon. If they chose to make.bombs instead of fuel, they could make dozens a year.
numpad0 10 hours ago||
That's the dormant plant. Rokkasho-mura plant is officially incomplete for decades, doing tests and upgrades without actual production.

If you think otherwise and you're not wrong, and I think you ARE not mistaken since this isn't the first time someone other than myself mentioned it here, that means they're making bombs because we in Japanese public aren't told about it. There has only been just some routine commentaries from local mayors at most.

yorwba 8 hours ago|||
I think you might be confusing the Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant (not yet operational, intended for plutonium extraction from spent fuel) and the Rokkasho Uranium Enrichment plant, which has been running at 75 tSWU/year (I think that should be kSWU or tSW) since 2023-08-24 https://www.jnfl.co.jp/ja/business/about/uran/daily/enrichme... 112.5 tSWU/year since 2025-06-26 https://www.jnfl.co.jp/ja/business/about/uran/daily/enrichme... and 150 tSWU/year since 2025-11-20 https://www.jnfl.co.jp/ja/business/about/uran/daily/enrichme...

It's a bit weird though that they have a graph of tons of uranium hexafluoride shipped that shows the last shipment in 2018 and nothing since then.

redsocksfan45 5 hours ago|||
[dead]
turkeyboi 15 hours ago||||
Enriched uranium is perfectly safe to dump but it would be stupid to do so. Fission products are nasty but uranium itself is not, comparatively.
SoftTalker 21 hours ago|||
The analogy would be if you "un-enrich" it. Then it's safe. Or at least no worse than when you took it out of the ground.
ceejayoz 21 hours ago||
> The analogy would be if you "un-enrich" it.

But you're doing that with the same water you're trying to make in the first place!

SoftTalker 21 hours ago||
You could just dilute it using fresh seawater, if you used enough and (maybe) spread it over a wider area. The amount of water people need for drinking is a relative drop in the ocean.
ceejayoz 21 hours ago||
Brine doesn't necessarily behave the way you imagine.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brinicle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brine_pool

jaggederest 20 hours ago|||
Blue Planet video of a brinicle, content warning for kind of horrifying death of sea creatures: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAupJzH31tc
ianthehenry 13 hours ago||
And a Blue Planet II video of a brine pool, stronger content warning for much more horrifying death: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwuVpNYrKPY
threwrfaway 19 hours ago|||
You can dilute the brine in a facility before disposing.
ceejayoz 18 hours ago|||
Go on. With what?
asdff 16 hours ago|||
Seems like you could just dilute it with seawater at like 100:1 ratio and it would be negligible done offshore. We already dump our shit 5 miles out.
threwrfaway 15 hours ago||
100:1 is overkill and energetically very wasteful. It's a fairly straightforward chemical engineering problem.
threwrfaway 15 hours ago||||
...sea water. You take 10 units of sea water for every unit processed and you'll get a slight increase in salinity.

A phase diagram tells you exactly how far you need to go.

You know this makes more thermodynamic sense than carbon capture, right?

pasquinelli 16 hours ago|||
gasoline
wlesieutre 18 hours ago|||
With fresh water, we’ll get it from desalinization! Hey wait a second…
threwrfaway 15 hours ago||
Sarcasm aside, your comment actually works: you can use the freshwater from desalination!

Just wait for the saltwater to come back around in the sewer.

wlesieutre 14 hours ago||
Globally about 70% of freshwater is used for agriculture so less than a third of it will come back around, if it's exclusively for residential/commercial use you might do better but overall not a strategy that balances out
threwrfaway 5 hours ago||
70% of desalinated water wont ever go to agriculture because its too expensive to use for corn. Only very high value crops need apply.

But, so what? 30% sewage is still a strong dilluant... especially when mixed with more seawater

Im shocked how many people cannot grasp that you can dilute brine's salinity arbitrarily close to seawater's with energetically cheap pumps.

Enginerrrd 21 hours ago|||
Municipal waste water is a much cheaper way to get desalinated water in the first place though.
lazide 21 hours ago||
except for the pharmaceuticals anyway
Enginerrrd 2 hours ago|||
That’s been a solved problem, engineering-wise, for a while.

The advanced treatment stages take care of it. Between UV, ozone, and nanofiltration, etc. we can remove the pharmaceuticals.

Actually the problem is the water comes out too pure out of a well designed water reuse system, to the point where the mineral content can be too low and you need to add some back in.

shermantanktop 18 hours ago|||
Hey, it's free viagra, prozac, progesterone and multivitamin supplements, all in a glass.
xp84 12 hours ago||
There’s some fat fish out there, I hope we can get those guys some Ozempic too
collingreen 17 minutes ago||
Democrats intentionally killing the fishing industry by giving fish free glp1s and cocaine with your tax dollars!
threwrfaway 15 hours ago||||
Actually it's easy and ok. Just mix it with the treated sewage right before it returns. Simple mass action implies the salinity hasn't changed.

But wait! There's water mass loss due to leaky pipes and outdoor pools!

Mixing salt water and brine is perfectly ok. Just use a phase diagram.

xyzzyz 18 hours ago||||
Maybe, but dumping crystalline salt is even worse to the spot you’re dumping it on.
asdff 16 hours ago|||
It doesn't need to be crystalline salt. Just mix the brine with seawater at a really high ratio of sea water to brine then dump that out. 100:1 ratio should be fine I would guess. Quick search suggests seawater salinity variance is already like 10%-15% or so. Even better if you pipe it offshore where currents will take it and not somewhere that doesn't circulate.
xyzzyz 14 hours ago||
Yes, that's my point: if you're next to the ocean, disposing of brine is extremely easy.
pajko 14 hours ago||||
You could put it back into old salt mines.
kijin 13 hours ago||
Even better, just package it up and eat it instead of digging underground and creating more pollution.

It's not every day that industrial waste happens to be not only edible but also tasty. Too tasty, in fact. Salt is addictive.

xp84 12 hours ago||
It’s not going to be pure NaCl though; making Morton salt with it would make sense only if it wouldn’t cost more to process it (net of its resale value) than just disposing of it somewhere not particularly sensitive. I’d propose the Utah salt flats or indeed, kinda love the idea of just sticking them in a salt mine that is all tapped out. If it used to be chock full of salt it seems pretty environmentally fair to make it salty again.
kijin 8 hours ago||
The impurities are exactly what give sea salt from various regions their distinctive flavors and mineral profiles. The salt should be edible as long as it wasn't pulled from seriously polluted waters. It might even sell for a premium.
card_zero 18 hours ago|||
I wonder. It would have to dissolve, a big block of salt would take a while, kind of like the erosion of cliffs where the salt comes from in the first place. Eh, I guess you're right though, the fish wouldn't like that at all.
iberator 5 hours ago|||
that's 200% bullshits. Countries that invested into desalination plants are known to create death zones right where brine is sent back - even if miles from the coast
qurren 21 hours ago||||
Why? Just build mountains out of it and maybe even open a salt-ski park in the tropics for people who don't have snow.
asdff 16 hours ago||
There are salt mountains lining most midwestern freeways as it is for winter.
ssl-3 10 hours ago|||
Assuming my constants (35g/kg of salt in seawater, 650k tons of salt dumped by the state of ohio every year, 81 gallons per day of individual domestic water usage) are correct and my napkin math isn't completely buggered, and if we look at the salt as a primary product instead of just waste:

Ohio DOT's use of road salt would allow for fresh water to be provided for somewhere in the neighborhood of 160,000 people.

On one hand, that's nowhere near enough people; it's a small drop in a giant thirsty bucket of water consumption. So we'll still need salt mountains, salt re-distribution vessels, and/or other ways to deal with excess salt.

On the other hand, 160k is a lot of humans. So perhaps we should look into doing things like this anyway.

(But we probably won't. Ohio gets road salt primarily from a mine under Lake Erie that has a very conveniently-located terminus near downtown Cleveland. The mine directly loads trucks, freight trains, and ships...and it's near the point of use already. It's pretty efficient.)

xp84 12 hours ago|||
I just realized that future archaeologists will be tracing our roads using the salt residue!
Ekaros 5 hours ago|||
Actually I have been thinking about this. Surprisingly straight and long cuts in rock formations might be a real thing to track. In at least some places at least some rock blasting is preferred to get aggregate for road foundations. And these tends to be rather straight and rather steep.
make3 8 hours ago|||
or just you know.. asphalt residue
galaxyLogic 21 hours ago||||
I think I read somewhere that salt can be used as energy storage medium? So we could get both water and batteries for renewal energy.
xyzzyz 18 hours ago||
It’s about thermal storage, you don’t use table/sea salt for that, and you don’t need a lot of salt, because the salt is in a closed loop; it’s not being consumed.
galaxyLogic 18 hours ago||
But more thermal storage you want more salt you want, and it's gotta cost something, right?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molten-salt_battery

xyzzyz 17 hours ago||
If you read the article you sent me, you'll learn that, just as I said, you don't use sodium chloride, aka table salt, aka sea salt, for these purposes.
aeonfox 15 hours ago||
A better example are sodium ion batteries, which are about to take off in a big way

https://www.catl.com/en/news/6812.html

darksnart 2 hours ago||||
Oh no, the hassle of managing the raw input for several key industrial processes that is created for free as a side product of MAKING WATER DRINKABLE WITH FREE ENERGY FROM THE SUN is TOO MUCH OF A PROBLEM! Especially considering we could instead murder millions of fish - which we then can’t eat- in the process! This entire technology is doomed!

Come on guys please at least attempt to think what you’re about to type, please, I beg you.

RobotToaster 20 hours ago||||
> Solid crystalline salt, on the other hand, is a hassle.

Just put it on your fries.

nkrisc 21 hours ago||||
In an ideal world that crystalline salt by product could be used to offset any imported or mined salt, further reducing the environmental impact of those operations.
lightedman 21 hours ago||||
"Solid crystalline salt, on the other hand, is a hassle."

Just make prettier-than-Himalayan salt lamps out of it and sell it to hippies. Easy solution.

rapnie 5 hours ago||
That only shifts the problem. Now we need an increased supply of hippies that are hard to come by in a low hippie-tolerant environment.
cyanydeez 19 hours ago|||
yeah, if you like to kill everything in a few 100 feet radius and kill some more in the zone of reliance.

this is delusional ecological

xp84 12 hours ago|||
So, we could just dump it on the salt flats in Utah? Plenty of places are already super salty, so nothing lives there (unless it’s able to handle that).
xyzzyz 18 hours ago|||
Brine might be bad to the place you dump into, but crystalline salt is even worse.

Overall though, it’s just such a tiny concern. Ocean is huge. If we kill everything in a 100 foot radius, that’s 0.0000000008% of the ocean being destroyed. Less than a drop in a bucket.

cyberax 20 hours ago|||
> My (limited) understanding is that conventional reverse osmosis is not far from the theoretical optimum, energy-wise, the main difficulties being operational (the membranes need declogging). And of course RO is more expensive than rain.

RO is about 2-4x the theoretical minimum, depending on how much water you're willing to reject.

aaron695 17 hours ago||
[dead]
Animats 22 hours ago||
The paper: [1]

They're still at lab scale in glass. They haven't built a usable system, even a small one. The big claim here is that it doesn't clog; capillary action moves the salt out of the active area to another area, where some yet to be developed mechanism removes it. That needs to be demonstrated. If they can come up with something that runs for years without clogging or replacing the active material, that's a real advance.

Laser surface preparation is known.[2] It's useful for roughening smooth surfaces in a very structured way, in preparation for painting. The result is a smooth paint surface. If you sandblast to roughen, the first paint layer is somewhat irregular. Then you need to sand and paint again to get a smooth surface. Laser roughening has been tried for auto painting, but didn't go mainstream. A good question here is whether commercial laser surface prep systems can make the material this new process uses.

[1] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41377-026-02315-4

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKYOglHYo_Y

Nifty3929 22 hours ago||
It reminds me of how the Panama canal was built, and actually the first major attempt failed and they gave up. What they learned for the second attempt was that digging was not the hard(est) part to solve - it was how to move the dirt! So much dirt!

Great book on this BTW: Path Between the Seas. I couldn't put it down.

Animats 21 hours ago|||
Fragility is a common problem in surface treatments, sometimes called "nanotechnology". There are super hydrophobic surface treatments that are very effective. They generate a surface which is a forest of tiny sharp points. The surface tension of water is too high to cling to such a surface. You can make something that just will not get wet. The problem is that the points are fragile, and wear destroys the effect.

Another example is ultra black coatings. Those are a forest of tiny black objects arranged so that light gets reflected multiple times and is absorbed. The commercial version is called "Vantablack". It doesn't wear well, but for optical applications such as the insides of camera lenses and telescopes, that's fine.

pchristensen 20 hours ago|||
It's such a good book! Like any dad reading history, I have been annoying my family for years with fun facts I learned in that book. David McCullough's other books like The Great Bridge (about building the Brooklyn Bridge) are also great.
Nifty3929 18 hours ago||
You and I are the same person apparently. Let me tell you about malaria! Or the bends! Or tetanus! Please! Wait, where's everybody going?
jmward01 21 hours ago||
This is an interesting tech, but I have big doubts. In the picture you can see some salt coating the surface. Even just a little seems like too much for this type of system. I really hope they can make this work and scale this up.
Animats 6 hours ago|||
This is similar to a MIT press release from 2023.[1] That's another passive solar powered desalinization system that supposedly doesn't clog with salt. The author's paper list has the 2023 paper, but no followup.[2]

Another MIT paper on desalination from 2024 has a more conventional electrically powered system that can adjust its operating speed depending on how much power is coming in. So it can run off intermittent power sources such as its own solar panels.[3] Rather than buffering the energy with batteries, just buffer the water in a tank. This made it to field test and has some efficiency numbers.

It's annoying to see these one-off announcements with no followup. A short note a year later reporting why there's no further work would be useful to later workers.

[1] https://news.mit.edu/2023/desalination-system-could-produce-...

[2] https://drl.mit.edu/publications/journal/

[3] https://www.greenmemag.com/science-technology/breakthrough-m...

KaiserPro 3 hours ago|||
The crucial part is that pressure from the capillary action pushes the concentrated brine out onto the non capillary area. unlike fabric the area isn't enclosed so cleaning is easier if the salt starts to accumulate.

Obviously it needs to be cleaned regularly otherwise the salt encroaches into the sensitive bits. However the cleaning method doesn't require dissolving, just scraping.

YeGoblynQueenne 18 hours ago||
>> The solar-powered system uses specially engineered black metal to absorb sunlight.

The new system replaces the earlier version that used specially engineered death metal.

BLKNSLVR 17 hours ago|
Which was a big upgrade from the prior system which just used a heavy rock.
jpkw 6 hours ago||
Which in turn was a huge upgrade from classical methods
fhdkweig 1 day ago||
This appears to be the same New Rochester article as 4 days ago with 20 comments.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48349507

b0rbb 23 hours ago||
Awesome, love seeing stuff out of Rochester - RIT or UofR or any of the nearby schools.

Totally underrated area for academic pursuits.

haritha-j 22 hours ago||
Indeed, it’s the same university that gave us room temperature superconductors.
SimplyUnknown 7 hours ago||
Huh? That was University of Utah/Brigham Young University right. That is, if you're referring to Pons and Fleischman.
eesmith 7 hours ago||
Pons and Fleischman was cold fusion. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_fusion
mmmBacon 22 hours ago|||
UofR physic grad that also worked at the LLE here. Agree Rochester schools are underrated (although admittedly a little biased).

At least in the sciences you have access to lots of opportunities you don’t have at bigger name schools.

They set me up in life in a way that I don’t think would have happened elsewhere.

technothrasher 15 hours ago||
I had a great time at UR in the early 90’s because they had the most computing hardware per interested student in the country. I was able to relatively quickly work my way up to access to pretty much any system the school owned that I wanted, including the Cray at the LLE.
block_dagger 15 hours ago|||
As an RIT alum, I tend to agree.
0x59 23 hours ago|||
Agree! Shout out to the Laboratory for Laser Energetics
dyauspitr 22 hours ago||
RIT is pretty well known as a good school I believe.
userbinator 8 hours ago||
I believe the most efficient method to turn "ocean water into drinking water" is called "rain". We just need to better collect and transport the output of what is effectively the world's biggest solar-powered desalinator.
alex_duf 7 hours ago||
Obviously this is region specific, but slowing down water is one of the best ways to have fresh water.

Slow it down from trickling down a slope and you have two things: more vegetation (which also retains water) and more time for that water to penetrate the ground for local wells.

You can completely "terraform" a desertic region https://youtube.com/shorts/cfhbtgon4Nk?is=oAExB5UeMAsShBux

mettamage 7 hours ago|||
Let’s grab a giant pole and catch clouds. I wonder how much liter of water a giant cloud is. I also wonder what a good unit would be for a cloud. Small, medium and large is all I have
Laurel1234 8 hours ago||
Well, sometimes it doesn't rain and (at least for coast regions) being able to desalinate can be of critical importance.
LogicFailsMe 22 hours ago||
So crazy question: take a dehumidifier, attach some solar panels, and deploy at scale for non-potable water suitable for crop irrigation anywhere that isn't a desert. Does it work? And if not, why?
oceanplexian 19 hours ago||
The short answer is all those problems have already been solved.

Israel desalinates 75-85% of its drinking water. The problem is political and economic dysfunction.

California for example could be doing widespread desalination with nuclear power and technology from the 1970s. They could also greatly expand reservoirs and waterways, but don’t do it. Very similar to Rome in the 400s, when people were using aqueducts built by a past civilization but lost the ability to construct them.

iso1631 2 hours ago||
Nuclear is very expensive per MWh and thus per litre of water generated

Solar on the other hand is very cheap, and you don't need to desalinate 24/7 -- just do it when power is cheapest (which is during the sunny times if you have large amounts of solar, during windy if you have large amounts of wind, etc)

LarsAlereon 22 hours ago|||
It takes too much energy and produces water too slowly to scale. In general any area with sufficient moisture in the air to explore this also has easier access to rain and ground water.
jillesvangurp 11 hours ago|||
A lot of energy is only a problem if that energy is very expensive.

The good news in a desert: plenty of sunshine. So you can generate a lot of electricity with some cheap solar panels, there is plenty of space to put some down, and there aren't a lot of NIMBYs around to complicate the permitting process for that.

Some desert ecosystems actually depend on condensation with specialized plants and animals harvesting humidity from ocean breeze. Large parts of e.g. the Sahara border on the Atlantic ocean. Lots of water in the air but not a lot of rain. And even if humidity is low, there still is some water in the air usually.

But the simple fact of course is that there is a lot more water in water than there is in air. If you want to extract meaningful amounts of water from air, you need to process a lot of it.

LogicFailsMe 22 hours ago|||
Great point, in my case in the PNW, the water from my local well is infested with manganese (as in clogging the household plumbing in the absence of a sediment filter) and other contaminants and the water company providing it is owned by private equity. Legally, I can drill my own well for non-potable irrigation, but god forbid I filter and/or chlorinate it for my own household use. So I end up considering options like this, thanks for debunking.
SoftTalker 21 hours ago||
You don't need to chlorinate water from your own well, unless maybe you have a cistern that you are filling for storage.

And who's going to know if you are drinking it or watering your garden?

LogicFailsMe 20 hours ago||
At the very least I would UV disinfect anything coming from the ground and absolutely make use of a 20 micron sediment filter if only to address cognitive load: Another place, another time, coliform bacteria from the well. Super fun(not).
picofarad 12 hours ago||
I vacillate between trusting my well and trusting my RO (10,5,1 micron filters, plus the membrane). But it isn't healthy to drink RO all the time and I don't wanna mess with remineralization.

My well is 100' and 13 years old.

SoftTalker 2 hours ago||
For me I'd do a sediment filter and a charcoal filter and call it good. Send a sample out for analysis a few times a year.
KaiserPro 3 hours ago|||
Yield depends on humidity, which varies according to region and season.

It also requires more infrastructure to get yield. In theory all you'd need to have is these etched metal plates, a transparent dome and a source of briny water. (and a cleaning mechanism)

The etched plates creates 100% humidity (probably more as it'll condense out)

mrguyorama 22 hours ago|||
It "works" in the sense that this is what 99% of "Get water from air" scams are.

The reason it doesn't actually work is that it is extremely inefficient. Getting water to condense requires you to somehow reject massive quantities of heat. That's fundamental to physics.

Also, literally anywhere a dehumidifier is reasonably effective, is humid and usually doesn't have such dire water problems. Deserts have extremely low humidity and dehumidifiers working in a desert will produce very little water.

Even a good humidifier in a humid environment is burning KW to generate on the order of ten liters of water a day.

There are a couple places on earth that are essentially deserts but have an early morning humid fog roll through regularly, and those places figured out capturing that water in the air long long before we invented the refrigeration cycle.

It is literally cheaper to desalinate.

Maybe you could build giant greenhouses to fill with sea water and let the sun evaporate the water and collect that with a dehumidifier? Still absurdly inefficient. Water has such an obscene specific capacity for heat that any thermal avenue of separating it from something else will use immense energy.

wagwang 20 hours ago|||
The humid areas where they might work probably already have a lot of water?
casey2 22 hours ago||
What do you mean work? No, because there is no single dehumidifier on the market that will get you enough water, so you are out $80 grand, you could have just paid for water delivery.
gaiagraphia 20 hours ago||
Always wondered why the coast of the Red Sea isn't littered with channels which get flooded with seawater, which then evpporate into glassed ceilings; creating freshwater, and leaving behind salts for mining.

Sand -> Glass -> heated saltwater -> freshwater + minerals -> ??? -> profit?

Combined with some mangrove farms, surely desert coasts are able to support more life.

Wonder if this is scalable tech, and how quickly it can 'process' water. I guess if they're combined with transparent solar panels, it could be quite an epic tech.

dirt_like 20 hours ago||
Slightly different idea to take Red Sea water, concentrate it, and flow into the Dead Sea to stabilize the water level in the Dead Sea which is a big problem. A billion or so was spent but the project is on hold for some combination of financial, political and environmental issues.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Sea%E2%80%93Dead_Sea_Water...

gaiagraphia 19 hours ago||
I love projects like this. A shame the west has handed over the baton to the Chinese and Saudis when it comes to actually being daring with megaprojects.

Some over stuff whhich are cool to read about:

Redirecting Siberian rivers into Central Asia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_river_reversal

Redirecting Congo basin rivers to replenish Lake Chad https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Chad_replenishment_projec...

Filling in a depression in Egyptian Sahara desert and fllooding it with Mediterrraanean water to generate huuuuuuuuuuuuge hydro https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qattara_Depression_Project

(Similar ideas proposed for Lake Eyre, the lakes in Tunisia, and the Afar Depression in Djibouti, too).

AlexandrB 17 hours ago||
The Saudis aren't "daring" with megaprojects. They're fucking[1] stupid[2]. Saying their megaprojects are "daring" is like saying I'm "daring" for claiming I'm going to build a catapult that will launch me to the moon.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trojena

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Line,_Saudi_Arabia

defrost 17 hours ago|||
A comparison that only works if you say it and sink a few billion into foundations for said catapult.
dyauspitr 10 hours ago|||
That’s what daring means. You try things that do not guarantee success. I remember a decade of people shitting on Dubai for all of the crazy projects it was building. It really paid off for them (pre Iran war). They made something out of nothing and still are. What’s stupid about a kilometer high tower? It’s fucking awesome.
jrumbut 20 hours ago||
If you've ever been to the beach, you can smell the salt air and rotting seaweed and hear the birds.

It's all gonna get on the glass (from above and below), and eventually the salt left behind is going to build up. The salt left behind is very hard on any structure or machinery used to move it which makes repairing the large glass enclosure a pain. All this for a slow trickle of water is generally not worth it.

gaiagraphia 19 hours ago||
The Saudis were fucking around with the idea of solar domes at one point. Haven't heard anything about it for a while though (probably due to maths, lol). A shame, I've always been fascinated by Egypt and the empty expanses of nothingness. On long bus journeys around the country, the imagination can run wild.

https://www.solarwaterplc.com/featured-news/whats-inside-thi...

fakedang 13 hours ago||
The issue with that idea is very simple - creating those inlets into the desert would risk soil erosion - in the desert. If your objective was to desalinate water, you're much better off using conventional desalination (there's still way more room to work around here first, like better and sustainable membranes, etc.) and offsetting your emissions by locking carbon away in mangrove reserves, which are native to those desert coasts.
iceboundrock 14 hours ago||
I am wondering if they combined photomolecular effect[1] to make it even more energy-efficient

[1] https://news.mit.edu/2024/how-light-can-vaporize-water-witho...

biodiesel 10 hours ago|
Distillation of H2O, where it loses an oxygen molecule and becomes H2, or gains a hydrogen molecule and becomes H2O2.
More comments...