Top
Best
New

Posted by tosh 1 day ago

Nvidia is proposing a beast of a CPU system for Windows PCs(twitter.com)
320 points | 527 commentspage 6
sherazp995 1 day ago|
Wait a minute!

Nvidia going from GPU to CPU now?

wmf 1 day ago|
Nvidia has been making CPUs for 10-15 years.
userbinator 18 hours ago|||
Much longer than that...

https://theretroweb.com/chipsets/182

https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/drivers/uli-m6117c/

TiredOfLife 13 hours ago|||
But this one has mediatek cpu with off the shelf arm cores
buffer_overlord 22 hours ago||
Can it run Ubuntu?
ChrisArchitect 1 day ago||
Related:

A powerful new chapter for Windows PCs, accelerated by Nvidia RTX Spark

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48352693

Nvidia RTX Spark

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48352939

neuroelectron 21 hours ago||
It's going to be amazing. Almost twice as fast for only 10 times the heat. Consumers aren't concerned with efficiency they only care about performance.
danielovichdk 1 day ago||
A hardware company that propose to buy more hardware from them.

Must be a new business model.

....

Step into my office

Why ?

Because you are fucking fired

dcreater 1 day ago||
They announced RTX spark days ago. Why is this post linking to a "leak" tweet on the frontpage now?
epolanski 1 day ago||
Not gonna lie, I'm buying one of the 128GB ram ones for local inference if price is human.
jmyeet 1 day ago||
This is the RTX Spark [1].

The obvious comparison here is the M5 Max where you can buy a Macbook Pro with 128GB of also unified memory. Obviously CUDA cores are specific to NVidia so it's hard to directly compare but I've seen claims that the M5 Max is roughly equivalent to ~4000 CUDA cores. This obviously depends on workload and whether the CPU supports the precision you want to use (eg FP4).

The M5 Max has memory bandwidth of 819GB/s. The RTX Spark I believe is ~600. So it might be slightly better than the current generation of Macs but likely worse than the expected M5 Ultras of the new Mac Studios (likely Q3 2026).

For comparison, a 5090 has >20k CUDA cores and 1800GB/s memory bandwidth with 32GB of VRAM. The RTX 6000 Pro (at ~$10k) has 96GB of VRAM, same bandwidth and ~24k CUDA cores.

We have to see what RTX Spark systems sell for but the DGX Spark is in the Mac Studio price range (~$4k).

I do think Apple has a real opportunity here but there offerings aren't quite there yet. The M5 Ultras might be a really attractive option for local LLMs. I expect them to be in high demand.

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48352939

bigyabai 1 day ago|
> I've seen claims that the M5 Max is roughly equivalent to ~4000 CUDA cores

Who claimed that? The M5 is still a raster focused GPU, dedicated matmul blocks be damned. For some workloads that napkin math might work out, but for many others it's a wild overshoot. Time-to-first-token still favors CUDA, and real-world training workloads aren't getting anywhere near Apple Silicon.

All of the memory bandwidth in the world is useless if you spend 15 minutes processing 64k tokens worth of context prefill. This is where CUDA shines.

thrance 1 day ago|
Will it support Linux?
More comments...