Top
Best
New

Posted by Brajeshwar 3 hours ago

Why are so many young people getting cancer?(www.nature.com)
90 points | 72 commentspage 2
wavesounds 2 hours ago|
This would be a great thing for all of the AI companies to devote some energy towards. Especially with their reputations in decline. Surely there must be some patterns the AIs could find if we had enough data about the people who died from cancer.
witx 2 hours ago||
Yes, one good data point is pollution, which all these companies are prollific at.
witx 50 minutes ago||
Peak hackernews behaviour denying pollution from AI datacenters
opsnooperfax 58 minutes ago||
A dude at Oracle did that with a recent mass experiment of mRNA technology. We do not speak Of the results.
ManuelKiessling 2 hours ago||
If I had one unqualified guess free — and boy am I unqualified here — I’d wager it’s those „zero sugar“ stuffs.

No way you can just replace (also very very not good for you) sugar with something else and end up with all the upsides and no downsides.

aeturnum 2 hours ago||
Without counting anything out it's worth saying that artificial sweeteners are some of the most-tested food ingredients because of concern about their health impacts. It's possible that we missed something, but you have to weigh that against the chance we missed something about every other possible food ingredient (all of which have been tested less).
ragequittah 1 hour ago||
I used to be in this same boat whenever someone questioned my sugar-free drinks. Trust the science! Then more science saying new things about artificial sweeteners kept coming out. And then I personally (with the mindset of "they can't possibly do harm") started getting stomach issues that I can pretty much definitively link to any time I drink sucralose. Which is a shame because I loved me a coke zero. If I drink/eat it by accident I'll always know within 2 hours from an intense stabbing pain in my side. This didn't happen until I had already been drinking it for many years.

Aspartame is listed as possibly carcinogenic now after having "0 problems" for decades and having that same claim of being some of the most tested food additives on the planet. Most artificial sweeteners are also still linked to problems with insulin response, weight gain, and diabetes which are the things we were trying to prevent by drinking them in the first place. Do some more research and you'll find things like links to cognitive decline, clotting with things like xylitol, depression, gut microbiome problems / even possibly intestinal wall integrity issues (sucralose-6-acetate).

The science was settled (and probably mostly funded by the companies that sold the products) right up until it wasn't. Now there seems to be huge concerns. I wouldn't be surprised if some of these substances are banned within our lifetime.

aeturnum 51 minutes ago|||
I don't think it's worth going through and providing you links about the mischaracterizations in your post - as you seem to have your own sources - but your depiction of the history of scientific consensus is not accurate. As you say problems caused by sweeteners around weight gain, insulin regulation, etc are long documented. As are the many studies showing that sweeteners cause cancer at doses (100x+ iirc) far above those consumed by average humans.

That said, the topic here was on cancer, and even the WHO announcement about aspartame being possibly carcinogenic clarifies it's not for normal ranges of consumption. I think you're trying to make a boogie man out of scientists and researchers by mischaracterizing the complex work they do. If you feel that things have suddenly reversed course it's because you haven't been following the research.

lompad 1 hour ago|||
The problem here is looking at a substance in isolation, instead of comparatively.

The actual question is: would drinking that stuff with sugar have caused more damage to health? And the answer will likely be yes. Because we _know_ just how bad sugar is for you. Particularly diabetes, microbiome changes, addictive behavior, obesity of course, cardiovascular issues...

If you'd look at sugar in isolation, as a new substance that stuff would never be allowed in any country at all.

hombre_fatal 2 hours ago|||
Nah, technology advancement is full of free lunches.

It breaks our ape brain intuition that anything good must also be bad. But consider all the food tech you take for granted while singling out zero-cal sweeteners.

ahoka 2 hours ago||
I’m pretty sure it’s the avocado toasts.
kypro 1 hour ago||
Chronic inflammation is almost certainly part of this and lots of things about our modern ways of living cause higher levels of inflammation.

- Obesity and sugary drinks/food

- Various chemicals we use in agriculture, food products, cleaning, etc

- Lack of sleep

- Lack of exercise

- Stress

- Pharmaceuticals. And to be clear because I know this will be more controversial, I'm not anti-pharma, but lots of people today are being prescribed daily medication at ever young ages. We know many of these pharmaceuticals can marginally increase certain cancer risks.

- Low Vit D levels – seriously everyone should be supplementing

- Vaccines? Probably not, but I dunno... Call me a conspiracy theorist if you want, but if you're on your 5th Covid shot I feel like you might be putting your body at some marginally increased inflammatory risk there. Vaccines are quite literally deigned to induce inflammation to boost immune response after all.

- More radiation emitting devices – not sure about this one because I haven't done any research, but when I was younger people used to talk about this quite seriously and now it feels like something only conspiracy theorists say. I suspect there is some amount of truth to it even if 5G isn't going to literally give you cancer.

I think it would be more surprising if we didn't see an increase in cancer rates to be honest.

krs_ 44 minutes ago|
> - Low Vit D levels – seriously everyone should be supplementing

> - More radiation emitting devices

Yeah you should absolutely not be going out in the sun for your vitamin D if you believe the latter to be a cause because the sun emits many orders of magnitude more radiation than human made devices in daily use.

bobbby77 1 hour ago||
[dead]
goldylochness 2 hours ago||
[flagged]
black6 2 hours ago|
All the down voters have their heads in the sand.
trial3 2 hours ago||
and all the upvoters have returned to their three hour youtube video proving the moon landing was faked
DaSHacka 1 hour ago|||
Woah don't tell me you're one of those globies that think the earth is round now

Its clearly a dodecahedron ;)

black6 1 hour ago|||
Nothing made me doubt the moon landings more than working for NASA.
Covzire 1 hour ago||
We can't handle the truth.
dang 1 hour ago|
Maybe not, but please don't post unsubstantive comments to Hacker News.
Covzire 1 hour ago||
At what point is something unsubstantive versus not being allowed to become known as being substantive over political reasons? Politics has utterly poisoned the sciences.
dang 1 hour ago||
I'm sorry, but I don't understand your question.

My mod reply was superficial because there was so little information in the GP comment. It sounds like you're alluding to some of the background to your actual view, but we readers don't have any access to that from a comment like https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48448450. You have that state in your head; we don't have access to it!

If you would want instead to post a thoughtful, substantive expression of your actual view, that would of course be welcome.

kernal 2 hours ago||
[flagged]
mspgrunt 2 hours ago||
https://archive.ph/VlBAm

tl;dr ultra processed foods and pesticides

jeffnv 2 hours ago|
tl; dr the first 4 sentences: Ultra-processed foods, obesity, microbial toxins and agricultural chemicals were all considered. But a clear answer remained elusive.
ifjfkfkfkfj 2 hours ago|
I would just point everyone to scientific research about smoking in 1969ties. High endorsement and no risk at all.

Current "safe" dosage on coffeine is like 8 shots a day. No side effects!

owenpalmer 2 hours ago||
Why did you write it as "1969ties"?
Insanity 47 minutes ago|||
9 is next to 0, so my guess was typo.
bobmcnamara 1 hour ago||||
Not the commenter, but the same tobacco companies came up with many of the highly processed foods
ifjfkfkfkfj 1 hour ago|||
Just because system is trying to kill u, does not mean to stop all fun.
stronglikedan 1 hour ago||
> Current "safe" dosage on coffeine is like 8 shots a day. No side effects!

Still is, since none of the side effects of caffeine could be considered "dangerous". (Unless you're taking absurdly large amounts, of course, just like anything else.)