Obligatory Marketoonist: https://marketoonist.com/2023/03/ai-written-ai-read.html

When I read things like this, I wonder how, exactly, people have time for this sort of thing these days.

Lots of companies are led by people who think that GenAI should increase productivity and are going to make damn sure that it is. There's no room to figure out things like "etiquette" for how to pass along AI-generated content to coworkers.

Perfect. I find myself applying the same principle to online discussion boards and comment threads. Humans post a question looking for other human input and get replies saying "I asked Gemini and it said...". I find that ignorant and rude when the context is a request for human insight.

I strongly believe any platform that wants to avoid turning into slop pile needs to 1. enforce marking any AI generated content as such

2. allow people to filter out the AI content if they want

3. enforce draconic punishments for violation of 1

We might arrive at the moment where this is regulated by law.

human attention is all you need

s/demonstrate/perform/g

Now you have to add typos and not use completely standard elements of style that some people have been using for ages, like emdashes and "it's not X, it's Y"

Not true for HR. Despite their name, which is a complete mislead - except handling humans as resources -, nothing human exists there, robotic approaches are the norm there.

So feel free to use AI to pimp your resume, they will use AI to process it.

This should be a rule in the advertising industry.

How about reviving key signing parties?