Oddly, I wonder if this is not a great benchmarking prompt.

Forces me to rotate to get warning message to disappear (works fine on portrait, but regardless forces me to play with two hands..), when rotate doesnt even fit on phone.

fROnTEnD DeV Is DeAd

DeSiGN Is DeAD

Cool idea tho, could be a fun game if if the UX wasnt so hostile.

Yeah, but can it one-shot Sven Bomwollen?

Pretty great game, am having some fun

I didn't even have to play. Immediately after opening, some notification about rotating my phone is obscuring the instructions and I cannot read them.

> It's really fun and exactly how I imagined it.

If this is what you imagined, you need to imagine better.

* Pathfinding is terrible (if I end up inside the fenced area clicking outside doesn’t lead me out). * Forcing me to go landscape while not even filling the entire screen is terrible (where did you even test this). * Controls are disastrous (I’m either barking all the time or a bark makes my sprite ignore my movements).

You one-shotted this, and I will admit it’s incredible that these agents can create something like this in minutes.

But your statements along with the “most dangerous AI model” in the title are disingenuous. Please do better.

In which harness?

It’s sad that someone can think about a game for years and never really spend the time to just build it out. This is a very simple game even a CS student could build for an assignment. But now we’re supposed to be impressed an AI can one shot it for $20 dollars.

BAA VRAM EWE

The "world's most dangerous AI" framing is funny here because the result is basically the least dystopian use case imaginable