Top
Best
New

Posted by thm 10 hours ago

Fox to buy Roku(www.wsj.com)
224 points | 313 commentspage 4
ritzaco 6 hours ago|
Are they just following the Succession plot line now?
dkresge 7 hours ago||
Seems like an excellent startup opportunity? Build a clean, no-ads streaming stick with open source firmware upstream of the requisite DRM bits and who wouldn't buy one? Almost like what Roku used to be, and the reason we recommended it, for so many years.
jubilanti 7 hours ago||
Because it will cost 2-4x compared to a Roku, Amazon Fire, or other device sold below cost and subsidized with ad/VC money. And in order to work on the DRMed streaming platforms, you have to play along with the industry. Can't just relabel a random box from Shenzhen, "upstream of the requisite DRM bits" makes no sense.

The original NVIDIA Shield is more than 10 years old at this point and still sells used for around $100 and people are still paying $200 retail for a new 2019 Pro. Interestingly, that price has basically stayed flat at $200 from 2020 to 2026. You can install Lineage or whatever if you don't care about the DRM. It's exactly what HN people want, and that's how much it costs.

0cf8612b2e1e 3 hours ago|||
Can you clarify the DRM comment? Do streaming services not work or they get downscaled to some garbage resolution?

I am looking for options and being able to sideload on a Shield is attractive, but if the experience is no different than a homemade Linux HTPC, I can save the cash.

sciencejerk 6 hours ago|||
No ads on Nvidia shield?
whywhywhywhy 3 hours ago|||
> requisite DRM bits

This is full on Google Play Services certification and more. Ultimately to get the thing that can run/stream Netflix etc the amount of work just isn't viable for the price point people would pay for this.

Also the truth is no investor would touch this on hardware sale income alone, needs some subscription plan at least.

Roku was always a weird one, beloved by people who couldn't stand laggy built in TV interface but doesn't really offer much beyond what TVs come with anyway.

xnx 7 hours ago||
This sounds great to me, but the mainstream market has shown they probably wouldn't pay even $5 more for such a device when something they think is good enough is built into the TV.
Seattle3503 6 hours ago||
Time for Graphene based streaming boxes?
tiahura 3 hours ago||
Glad that at least one of the Amiga guys finally gets rich.
thebiglebrewski 9 hours ago||
So what are the alternatives?

I have mostly Frame TVs and a projector. I always loved the Roku experience, it really felt like the best media player software, they just kept improving it, and having all TVs on the ecosystem made it even better. One app for virtual remotes, bluetooth listening, searching with your phone keyboard, etc.

I don't want to go back to the Frame's software. I really like the Backdrops app and so many other features.

But it just seems like this acquisition can only accelerate the ensh*tification of Roku. They already changed the default home screen a few weeks ago to show recommendations, SO MANY ads, etc and you change it in settings.

But as other commentors have mentioned, now we'll probably have Fox News and Truth Social front and center whether we want it or not.

So many apps have DRM that prevent you from running it yourself in any way. Is there another way that lets you run Netflix, Paramount+, HBO, all the majors without any trouble that is as integrated as Roku, or at least anything heading in that direction?

hamburglar 9 hours ago||
> I don't want to go back to the Frame's software

It’s not really a viable option if you wanted to. I have two Frames and they both just keep deteriorating to the point they are pretty useless. I have added an appletv to one of them and it’s vastly improved the UX. Now the only thing I need to do with the Samsung software is the unreasonably slow task of switching inputs.

gaws 7 hours ago||
> So what are the alternatives?

A dumb TV you can buy for cheap on Facebook Marketplace or Craigslist with an Nvidia Shield or a similar streaming device running Android.

kgwxd 3 hours ago||
Everyone's finally about to learn why it's dumb as hell to let an app store be built into your display.
gertrunde 7 hours ago||
I can't really see this ending well for the end user, however well it does/doesn't end for the stakeholders.

I thought Roku took off due to their focus on the streaming platform itself, and being agnostic to the streaming services that could be accessed via that platform. Having one specific content producer buy that platform feels like it destroys or devalues the USP of the platform, at least from the point of view of the consumer/end-user.

Or is this just another step in the relentless enshittification of all services?

pickleglitch 9 hours ago||
So now the same corporation that owns Fox News is going to own Roku? No thanks. Guess it's finally time to switch to a custom Android TV box or Apple TV. Or roll my own, but I've tried that and found it pretty difficult.
giancarlostoro 9 hours ago||
They already own Tubi (think Hulu alternative) which I've used when literally no other streaming service had what I was looking for, and is surprisingly decent. I assume this is the beginning of their leap into streaming, wont be surprised if there's other acquisitions that will take place in similar spaces.

Personally I never bought into Roku because I didn't think they'd last very long.

IshKebab 9 hours ago|||
> Or roll my own, but I've tried that and found it pretty difficult.

I agree, there seem to be no good options for this. You can use Kodi or whatever, but I want something that supports playing my ... totally legally acquired content... and Netflix/Disney/iPlayer/etc. In a package that's silent and low power.

Doesn't seem to exist unfortunately. I guess the closest is Nvidia Shield. You can apparently still sideload APKs onto that... for now. I'll buy one when they release an update. I'm patient!

CrimsonCape 4 hours ago|||
Yeah, this space seems pretty sparse. Some of the Radxa SBCs are getting closer to a hardware solution for your vision, but there isn't real mainstream software. A self-hosted DNLA server is probably the most realistic option but DNLA has seemed to fall by the wayside in favor of paid streaming and plex/jellyfin.

That said, Tailscale did not exist when DNLA was popular, and DNLA over Tailscale seems a really promising non-jellyfin avenue.

Ultimately the problem will be lack of hardware decoders and poor interop with Dolby, DTS, etc.

https://bret.dk/radxa-dragon-q8b-a-laptop-cosplaying-as-an-s...

IshKebab 3 hours ago||
I think the problem is that legit apps like Netflix are super restrictive about what they'll run on. Even if you just do it through a browser you need to be using Chrome on Windows or whatever or they'll restrict you to 720p.
presbyterian 9 hours ago||||
If you’re already DIYing, set up a Jellyfin server and then any of the streaming boxes will work.
pickleglitch 9 hours ago||
Jellyfin is great, but it is solving a different problem entirely.
NetMageSCW 9 hours ago|||
Apple TV.
IshKebab 7 hours ago||
Fine for Netflix etc. but it's not going to let you run bittorrent or whatever without a lot of pain.
newaccountman2 9 hours ago||
I would not recommend Apple TV. I like the computers and the phone, but the TV is disappoint. Would recommend Nvidia Shield or something.

What I am going to do down the line personally is just buy a gaming laptop and use that. Can play games via Steam and watch stuff via Windows apps (e.g. Netflix, Amazon Prime, Crunchyroll).

Only problem of course is the laptop will be pricier, but if someone was going to buy a tv streaming thing AND a gaming system of some kind, probably cheaper.

iwhalen 9 hours ago|||
If you already have a gaming desktop, I can recommend Shield for both. Streaming services work out of the box of course. Then I use Sunshine[1] on my desktop to stream to Moonlight on the Shield. Both have wired ethernet connections. Latency is not noticeable in most cases.

[1]: https://app.lizardbyte.dev/Sunshine/

newaccountman2 9 hours ago||
Nah, gave my desktop to my sister :e
pickleglitch 9 hours ago||||
I like the laptop idea, I'd go with Linux instead of Windows, and even then I think it would be a challenge to get it working well with a remote. Nvidia Shield is just Android TV, which means handing Google all your data. Of course, Apple TV means handing Apple all your data, but that seems like maybe the least bad option. I don't know, I'm just tired of all of this shit.
newaccountman2 8 hours ago||
I feel like remote can be convenient, but that I could get by with bluetooth keyboard with a built-in trackpad.

I wonder if it would be possible to operate the computer as a whole with PS5 controller :thinking:

mplanchard 9 hours ago|||
Agree Apple TV is not especially impressive (like, it’s fine, but I especially dislike the remote). I mostly just use my playstation, but there are some apps (criterion being the main one) that are not on the PS, so I use the Apple TV for those
newaccountman2 8 hours ago||
Can you watch stuff from PlayStation though, like Netflix? lol
mplanchard 8 hours ago||
Yes, it has netflix, hbo, hulu, crunchyroll, etc etc etc. Even Apple TV (the streaming service).

The only thing I use but isn’t on there is criterion.

newaccountman2 8 hours ago||
Shit, maybe I should just get a PlayStation :0
mplanchard 4 hours ago||
I resisted buying an apple tv for a long time, because I was going to have a playstation either way for games!

The (relatively) poor quality and difficulty of hooking my laptop up to the TV for criterion eventually pushed me to get one just for that, since there’s no word on if criterion has any plans to release an app for PS

Apocryphon 6 hours ago||
Wonder what they will do with Howdy, their paid service.
More comments...