Noam Shazeer Joins OpenAI

Posted by lukasgross 7 days ago

355 points | 420 commentspage 4

starchild3001 7 days ago||

[dead]

ath3nd 6 days ago||

[dead]

AiNexus 6 days ago||

[flagged]

bschmidt100 6 days ago||

[dead]

mkw5053 7 days ago||

[dead]

aplthrowaway67 7 days ago||

[flagged]

tomhow 6 days ago|

We've banned this account.

bschmidt100 6 days ago|||

[dead]

aplthrowaway67 6 days ago|||

[dead]

yigalirani 7 days ago||

[flagged]

mrcwinn 6 days ago||

I would just love to hear your definition of that word.

uejfiweun 6 days ago|||

Any sources on this?

hiddencost 6 days ago||

Defining opposition to genocide as antisemitic is a really bad idea.

ripped_britches 6 days ago||

[flagged]

ctdinjeu7 6 days ago|

[flagged]

highfrequency 6 days ago||

> idea thief. Takes credit for others’ work.

Based on what?

dang 6 days ago|||

GP is a serial troll whom we've banned hundreds of times, so the answer to your question is almost certainly nothing.

sandeepkd 6 days ago|||

I think this is a hard question if you ask people to start providing proof for things like this. A lot of such opinions are usually baked into individuals personal experience and perception. Nevertheless one has to feel very strongly to share such a take here in this manner unless they are gaining something from it.

SecretDreams 6 days ago|||

This perspective is only relevant if we assume nobody on HN ever posts maliciously. Some of the circles here are small, incestuous, and probably have some resentment. Other times, there's clear botting - very hard to talk against Elon or his companies without a load of down votes.

Needless to say, the OP could be right but they could be right without proof. Or proof would out them. Or it's malicious posting. Don't take anything on the internet too seriously, even in such sanctimonious spaces as HN.

projektfu 6 days ago||

I always thought it was people who were married to their book, or just fanboys. Some of these accounts that jump in to defend are quite old.

johntb86 6 days ago||||

> Nevertheless one has to feel very strongly to share such a take here in this manner unless they are gaining something from it.

Do they really? What does it cost them if they're wrong?

JumpCrisscross 6 days ago|||

What? If I call someone a thief, I should be able to point to something they stole.

sandeepkd 6 days ago|||

There is a big difference how one acts in a court and in real life. The original statement could either be a slandering (hard to know what they get to gain from it) or its their bitter experience/perception that they feel strongly about, are are sharing on a platform like this.

zaat 6 days ago||

sandeepkd is an idea thief. Also, he is short guy but walks with high shoes so people will think he is tall.

ipaddr 6 days ago|||

In a court of law sometimes. In the real world some facts have verifiable proof but the majority have little if anything that can be shared publicly or exists.

JumpCrisscross 6 days ago||

If someone called my friend a thief and couldn’t even point to what they stole, I’d mercilessly judge them even outside a court of law. That’s a serious accusation. Going off vibes is totally inappropriate.

golem14 6 days ago||

Maybe he's preparing the next aquihire for Google ?

C'mon people, if you don't know Noam personally, who are you to fling such accusations?

I really hate the low bar of HN discussions lately. It's late-Slashdot-level. Brrr.

More comments...