Top
Best
New

Posted by Adam-Hincu 16 hours ago

Microsoft new Outlook takes 10 seconds to do what Outlook Classic does instantly(www.windowslatest.com)
625 points | 414 commentspage 9
mc32 15 hours ago|
They so screwed Outlook. The stupid thing refuses to respond after switching to a diff network or SSID till it’s completed some synchronization of some kind. The stupid app refuses to come into focus.

I really don’t need the freshest view at once. Maybe I just need to look at an open email you dog of an app!

Why did they castrate Outlook? Does MS hate itself? What in the name of shit are they thinking? Who does this make happy?

InitialLastName 15 hours ago|
What I don't understand is why search is so broken.

If I do a search of my inbox with a lot of results, it gets lazy-loaded. Fair enough. But why, when I scroll to the bottom and it loads the new batch of email, does the view need to jump back to the top of the list?

Why has Gmail been able to recognize and properly group/deduplicate prior conversations in top-posted email threads for 20 years, but Outlook can't bother? That also breaks search, since every email with the result somewhere in its body (even prior emails) will appear.

expedition32 14 hours ago||
I honestly don't even care so much because I do everything on my phone these days but yes it has become apparent that Microsoft hates Office.
classified 13 hours ago||
The only thing not slowing down is the speed of enshittification at Microslop.
knorker 16 hours ago||
> like all web apps, it’s slow

No, that's a very uninformed take, and contradicted on two fronts:

1. Microsoft's other native apps have gotten unusably slow lately, too.

2. There's definitely plenty of fast web apps.

I don't mind snark, but make it factually accurate.

This is just Microsoft's poor strategic decision to try to drive as many as possible to Linux. Hell, weren't they bragging recently about managing to make opening the start menu take only a tenth of a second? It should be instant.

Maybe they think we'll replace users with AI, too. AI is the only thing slower than Microsoft's UIs lately.

sgt 15 hours ago||
Web apps tend to be a mixed bag. After a while they become slow because of dozens of async operations relying on network.

That can be an issue for native apps too, but they tend to be designed in a local-first manner, which means that they'll always have a speed advantage, assuming your typical dev team.

knorker 5 hours ago||
> Web apps tend to be a mixed bag. After a while they become slow because of dozens of async operations relying on network.

That's not an inherent web-vs-native difference, though.

> That can be an issue for native apps too, but they tend to be designed in a local-first manner

That's a choice.

> which means that they'll always have a speed advantage

woah there. No.

> assuming your typical dev team

So it comes down to the developers (and project management, etc). Yup, I 100% agree with that.

So we agree that it's not a technical difference?

itopaloglu83 15 hours ago|||
Another way to say tenth of a second is 100,000,000 nanoseconds.

We have 4GHz computers with 8-16 cores, and it takes 100,000,000 cycles to show the start menu?

Edit: Corrected the scale factor.

xmddmx 15 hours ago||
Another way (which happens to be correct) to say tenth of a second is 100 000 000 (one hundred million) nanoseconds. You were off by a factor of 1000!
itopaloglu83 15 hours ago|||
Yeah, I skipped microseconds entirely.
jiggawatts 15 hours ago|||
Also, at a typical turbo speed of 5 GHz you get half a billion clock cycles and multiple instructions can be retired per clock for about one or two billion total in those 100ms.

That’s about 1,000 instructions per pixel of the Start Menu!

AshamedCaptain 15 hours ago|||
What native apps is Microsoft developing as of lately?
knorker 5 hours ago||
Most top of mind was this tragedy that Microsoft somehow thinks is "good" and not something to be ashamed of at all: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/commandline/the-new-run-dialo...
bigstrat2003 11 hours ago||
All web apps are in fact slow compared to native apps. They are also clunky (though that's my opinion, not a fact). There are better and worse web apps, yes. And it's possible to make native apps which are even worse than a web app. But "like all web apps, it's slow" is a perfectly fair statement.
knorker 5 hours ago||
That's not even remotely true.
ska80 12 hours ago||
enshitification
darig 14 hours ago||
[dead]
abustamam 7 hours ago||
They should just ask Copilot to convert it into a native app /s

But in all seriousness, if MS really did believe in copilot, there would be no need to write webapp slop. They could just write native app slop.

junglistguy 15 hours ago||
[dead]
anthk 16 hours ago||
Thank JS and Electron supporters for that.
vajrabum 15 hours ago||
Is the new Outlook client a JS/Electron app?
canucker2016 4 hours ago||
The article mentions that new Outlook uses a Webview2 control as the UI. You can call it JS/Webview.

Similar to Electron, but using an MS Edge browser window control as the webview control instead of Google Chrome.

It's lighter weight than Electron, if you consider that Webview2 ships with Windows and is shared with other Webview2 consumers as opposed to Electron apps which each ship with their own self-contained web browser.

j16sdiz 16 hours ago||
npm love this comment
aboardRat4 14 hours ago|
Is anybody still using email in 2026?

Everybody I know uses IM systems like Wechat, WhatsApp, Telegram, Signal.

kevinsync 14 hours ago||
Email is still (and IMO always will be) the defacto method of communication for anything professional, regardless of whether it's 1994, 2026 or 2095. I'm not even totally convinced that something else could come along and usurp it; it would have to be something so easy, so ubiquitous, fully-supported across every piece of software and internet that you encounter, while serving as a form of identity and "fixed geography" (think about how email addresses serve similar purposes as postal addresses), trustable, comprehensive, and completely open and free (not as in beer, but as in protocol-level free) ... and even then, the value prop would have to be cheaper, seamless to migrate all existing email-related stuff to, and backwards compatible with / significantly more compelling than email itself, to convince the world to adopt it.

I'd love to see it though, because email really is long in the tooth at this point.

ThinkingGuy 14 hours ago|||
IM is fine for quick, ephemeral communications ("I just arrived at the restaurant") or automated processes ("Your authentication code for $BANK is 9975"), but for meaningful, thoughtful communication between human beings, email works better for me. The main advantages:

- I use my own domain, so I'm not tied to any single provider

- I can keep a copy of everything (I still have some emails from 30 years ago)

jubilanti 13 hours ago||
Do you have a job?