Top
Best
New

Posted by azeemkafridi 3 hours ago

A website that lists websites to submit your website to(www.submission.directory)
238 points | 65 comments
marc 46 minutes ago|
Fun story:

I built BetaList 16 years ago which was one of the first "product discovery" platforms. Years before Product Hunt, etc.

I manually reviewed every submission and unfortunately often I had to tell founders that their startup didn't qualify to be included. Almost everyone would (understandably!) argue their case, but as volume increased I couldn't afford to go into a deep argument with every single founder.

That's when I made https://submit.co a site similar to OP's. The idea being that instead of say "No, we will not feature your startup" I now gave them an alternative place to put their energy.

Initially it was mostly a list of tech blogs, but as more product discovery platforms popped up, I started adding them too. In a sense, I was promoting my competition but it was exactly the startups we couldn't list any way for one reason or another.

Eventually that list of "places to submit your startup" got so popular (and copied everywhere ) that it started driving traffic back to BetaList. (I included it at the very top of the list).

kilobaud 38 minutes ago||
Thanks for helping us launch LocalXpose however many years ago. I know it seems like product promotion is (rightfully) something to always be wary of, but I appreciate the forums you’ve provided startups hoping to find early adopters. We are (relatively speaking) successful nobodies, but I wonder if you have any memories of sites that “blew up” after being added on BetaList?
david_shi 24 minutes ago||
For the ones that don’t have a submit button, what have you found are the best ways to get featured?

I know some are pay to play but curious if there are other methods you’ve found effective.

transitorykris 2 hours ago||
What’s old is new again. In the 90s we used services like Submit It to get an URL into all the crawlers and indices. Now the search engines aren’t the challenge, it’s the sites targeting specific audiences.
dofm 2 hours ago||
Was that creaking sound your knee or mine?
transitorykris 2 hours ago||
Hard to say, drkoop.com is a landing page now
hexajon 1 hour ago|||
Ha, a new/old webring. If you are reading this and know what that is, it's time for your prostate/mammogram check-up.
0xdeadbeefbabe 1 hour ago||
Haha or colonoscopy.
rognjen 1 hour ago|||
And don't forget StumbleUpon...
thenthenthen 15 minutes ago|||
Delicious!
gurjeet 3 minutes ago||
For those not in the know, this is a reference to del.icio.us, one of the OGs to use Domain (Name) hack technique.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delicious_(website)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_hack

wslh 1 hour ago|||
Speaking of StumbleUpon, I'm not sure whether this was just luck or something about its recommendation algorithm/social graph, but it was the only service where I didn't see the usual flood of traffic followed by rapid decay, the classic Slashdot/HN effect. The curve felt much smoother.

I remember some bloggers at the time describing the same thing [1].

I'd be curious if anyone knows more details.

[1] https://mark.blog/2007/10/23/the-stumbleupon-effect/

dd8601fn 40 minutes ago||
I can see how that kinda makes sense.

We used StumbleUpon to visit interesting sites we wouldn’t otherwise find. It didn’t exist to keep you deeply engaged with a main StumbleUpon website.

The aggregators are meant to be the destination. The links are more like shiny dangling lures. Some of them (reddit) do everything they can to keep you from having a reason to leave the page at all.

So I suppose it would follow that one gets people engaged in your site, while the other kinda tries to keep them from doing that.

moebrowne 2 hours ago|||
Kinda reminds me of DMoz.
jonjacky 47 minutes ago|||
Curlie is the successor to DMOZ: https://curlie.org/docs/en/about.html

But Curlie doesn't appear in the website linked in the parent post.

dofm 2 hours ago|||
itsbeen84years.gif

Dmoz! Those were the good days. :-)

Barbing 2 hours ago|||
> Now the search engines aren’t the challenge

Although it can still be a gamble whether a small site made it to DuckDuckGo (Bing’s crawler)

But that only affects about seven of us anyway so your point stands

> Submit It

Trying to remember a different one…

htx80nerd 1 hour ago||
ya i cant believe im seeing this again
wenbin 32 minutes ago||
At listennotes.com , we have to delete tons of fake podcasts submitted to our site [1]

why do people create fake podcasts? they want to get backlinks from all podcast directories

podcasts are distributed via rss feed. and spammers/"growth hackers" put tons of links in the rss feed.

and podcast hosting services (especially those allow free trials, e.g., rss.com, ) could help them one-click to distribute to a bunch of podcast apps / websites

any examples? here you go -

* https://podcasts.apple.com/us/search?term=UU88%20

* https://podcasts.apple.com/us/search?term=%E6%B6%A8%E7%B2%89

* https://open.spotify.com/search/%E6%B6%A8%E7%B2%89/podcasts

most podcast websites / apps don't delete fake podcasts like we do at listennotes.com . so i guess the backlink hack w/ fake podcasts works. real human podcast listeners might suffer with spammy fake shows even on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

[1] https://www.listennotes.com/podcast-stats/#growth

PaulHoule 4 minutes ago|
... in general directory sites died because they got taken over by spam.
firefoxd 1 hour ago||
While i appreciate that there are websites where you can list your website, compiling them in a publicly available list is a recipe for spam.

Rather than post links to your websites on these websites, you need to share your website with your community. Imagine never using HN and then posting a show HN. You'll probably quickly get your domain banned.

When you are part of a website community, it's much easier to understand what kind of things you should post, as opposed to just drive-by posting everywhere.

The audience for these listings are people trying to take shortcuts.

kube-system 35 minutes ago||
> Imagine never using HN and then posting a show HN.

There's three green accounts on the front page of /show right now

atraac 1 hour ago|||
Website catalogues exist for more than a decade. They were one of the first attempts at gaming SEO.
jermaustin1 1 hour ago||
More than 3 decades. The original world wide web had them. Link "circles"[1] fell out of favor for SEO around 2015 or so, but before that, they had been a primary driver of Page Rank forever.

I worked in SEO from 2008 until 2015, and developed a lot of tools for increasing your PR from backlink indexing, to running a 15k domain blog network designed to build links to links to links to you, and my favorite: Click Faker - if you were ranked on Google already, on Page one or 2, it would search google find your site, click into it, navigate around, sit on some pages for a while before clicking an exit link or closing the browser - it was very powerful, but nearly impossible to scale, since it needed local residential IPs and I'm against botnets.

1. The circles actually couldn't close if you were looking for the ultimate page rank passthrough, they were actually a line, but still called circles.

faeyanpiraat 55 minutes ago|||
why would I get banned for showing my stuff?
fragmede 27 minutes ago||
How long does someone need to join the community before it's not a drive by? 3 hours? 3 days? 3 weeks? 3 months? 3 years?
andrelaszlo 1 hour ago||
I'd really like a website that submits your website to websites that lists websites that lists websites to submit your website to.
RattlesnakeJake 1 hour ago||
It could be a cousin to Wikipedia's List of Lists of Lists:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_lists_of_lists

thenthenthen 14 minutes ago||
This is one of my all time fav pages. Not kidding
0xdeadbeefbabe 1 hour ago|||
Sounds more fun than a recipe site.
paulddraper 1 hour ago||
Post another to HN, and it’s a good start…
susam 55 minutes ago||
I have been maintaining my own metalist of directories where one can submit their indie/personal websites to. In alphabetical order, here is what it looks like right now:

https://blogroll.org/

https://blogs.hn/ (by @surprisetalk)

https://hnpwd.github.io/ (I am one of the maintainers)

https://iii.social/ (by @freshman_dev)

https://indieblog.page/ (by @splitbrain)

https://kagi.com/smallweb/ (by @freediver)

https://marginalia-search.com/ (by @marginalia_nu)

https://minifeed.net/ (by @freetonik)

https://susam.net/wander/ (I developed this)

https://text.blogosphere.app/ (by @ramkarthikk)

https://wiby.me/

A clarification: The Wander link above (which I developed) is not something where you list your website. It is a tool you host on your website to become part of a decentralised network of personal websites (much like in a webring, except that the network is shaped like a graph rather than a ring): https://susam.codeberg.page/wcn/. More details here: https://codeberg.org/susam/wander

exhaze 45 minutes ago|
Nice! Just added your comment to my list of Perl script-inspired lists
dvh 3 hours ago||
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_lists_of_lists
xiaoyu2006 1 hour ago|
...recursion?!
pwython 1 hour ago||
Here's a much larger list (1,057 sites): https://pastes.io/rcPg2RLC
Cider9986 31 minutes ago||
FMHY (Free Media Heck Yeah) is my favorite website directory.

It has steadily grown far beyond just sharing free media and has everything from free AI and free education to free cooking websites.

It's probably a significant contributor to the recent return of piracy giving users constantly up to date and safe resources.

Website: https://fmhy.net

Github: https://github.com/fmhy

Retr0id 2 hours ago|
> earn quality backlinks

Well, at least its honest. For many (most?) of the listed sites, drive-by submitting a link just for the SEO juice would be considered rude.

hombre_fatal 1 hour ago|
The directories have to assume everyone is doing it for personal benefit. That's one of their main hooks to gather submissions, and they have to deal with the spam of bad actors.

If your website is a good quality addition to the lists, just submit it. Your exact motivation isn't really relevant if the qualifier holds.

More comments...