I think we need better classification and taxonomy on erroneous LLM behaviors than the catch-all term "hallucinate"..

hallucination is good for tasks that have an external oracle like computer programming

It's fine if it hallucinates, as long as it sounds overconfident

GLM 5.2 is really impressive at design as well. Overall loving it.

This reminds me of the Missing Dollar Riddle [1], where the listener is deliberately put on a wrong thinking path, to fool it.

With your own logical thinking you might never come to this confusion, and if you never heard this riddle before, you might be tricked by it.

But as we grow in life, and get experience, we learn about these riddles and aren't fooled as easily anymore.

Maybe it'll work like that for LLMs too?

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missing_dollar_riddle

It's very much looking like OpenAI will be bailed out, along with all the other Capex'ers. I say this because the trump admin (I feel partially at fault because I voted for him) has indicated they will be bailing out the entire ai stargate from intel and amd to amazon and anthropic. I know alot of everyday folks that absolutely hate - passionately HATE - anything and everything tech bro. Downvote all you want, that's the reality. They see Palantir et al as evil and demonic.

> One of the biggest models in the world was banned because a single jailbreak was too much of a risk.

We really don't know what the actual reason is given the politics at play. I would bet more on the Trump administration looking for any excuse to punish Anthropic

Calling llm slop "hallucinating" is so counter-productive imo. After all, LLMs are just a variant of markov chains and as such this technology isn't able to discern falsehoods from truths. It's like trying to use a barometer to tell the time.

loving glm 5.2 personally

to paraphrase the title, "in the land of the insane, those who are meerly delusional will rule"