Top
Best
New

Posted by ChrisArchitect 5 hours ago

The early hiring funnel is now breaking on both ends(hbr.org)
75 points | 122 commentspage 3
jerlendds 4 hours ago|
https://archive.ph/Pfl79
dude250711 4 hours ago||
> "For the C-suite, this is no longer just an HR headache, it is a critical strategic risk."

I have seen this phrase structure before.

peab 3 hours ago||
Anecdotally At the moment, about half of our inbound applicants are fake profiles
IshKebab 1 hour ago||
Pretty much all of their suggestions sound like things that should already be being done (and mostly are in my experience). I was asked a "tell me about a time" question for a job interview recently and it really took me by surprised because nobody asks those questions in tech anymore! They literally asked me what my strengths and weaknesses are. Wtf.

I didn't get that job but it was a blessing in disguise - I got a MUCH better job a few months later.

dweinus 4 hours ago||
> "The conversational interview, long considered the ultimate, unhackable test of a candidate’s authenticity"

Lol. I'm not sure this person has ever given an interview before

Simulacra 4 hours ago||
I have very little sympathy for companies grappling with this. They use AI to reject applicants within seconds, and make people jump through so many hoops (not to mention ghost jobs) that it's almost a humiliation ritual.
maccard 2 hours ago|
Nobody is using AI to auto reject candidates. ATS’s are “scoring” candidates but I don’t know of any that are sending rejections on application.

As a hiring manager, all the applications come to my inbox (even if it’s 300 in a day), and I’m definitely guilty of screening during non-working hours when I get a notification.

thrill 4 hours ago||
Hiring has always been broken.
12_throw_away 2 hours ago|
Dunno, the old school "we'll get you started in the mailroom, and you can work your way up by gaining knowledge about the organization while demonstrating competence and professionalism" sounds like a pretty solid hiring strategy.

Although tbf I kind of doubt if this was ever really the case - probably this is imagined nostalgia for idealized bygone times. And given that this is a strategy that requires, y'know, long-term investment and planning, it's not like it's going to start happening anytime in the near future

late2part 4 hours ago||
Here's how you fix hiring... Have them demonstrate competency.

It's really easy to screen out people when you say "Hey - login to this VM and show me how to import raw data into postgres and run a report."

Or do whatever you're going to do.

My favorite story is from a particular sean who had a candidate that said they'd been using VM for 20 years, and when he went into a document the candidate hit j 200 times to go line 200.

prepend 2 hours ago|
Comically I only know about 10 commands in vim and I’ve been using it for 30+ years. Qwxdypa$0 will get you pretty far in life.

I don’t use it as an IDE, I use it 5-10/year to read or edit a random file.

I probably wouldn’t remember “g” or whatever the goto command is. And hitting j 200 times isn’t the end of the world.

jeffrallen 4 hours ago||
I'm recruiting for apprentices right now. By definition, they have almost nothing to put on their CVs, and thus their CVs are more or less identical, or rather all of them have almost zero signal.

We took a chance on a flash recruiting session our canton organized. 35 interviews in 2 hr 15 mins. Crazy. But excellent signal, because if you are looking for it, and give the candidate a hint to show it ("tell me a story about how you solved a computer problem for your self/friend/family/club"), you can find the candidates with a spark. And I would not have detected it from their CVs or cover letter alone.

More human connection. Less machines. There, I fixed it for you.

josefrichter 4 hours ago|
It wasn't broken before?
More comments...