The repo summary has multiple typos.

It is sad that that FFS doesn't support FFS (BSD Fast File System) which inspired the architecture of the ext filesystem (and was the basis for a lot of unix filesystems).

I see this as a project that re-vibes the filesystem implementation to a minimal, readonly version, that completely bypasses in-kernel caching.

Is it really faster than normal filesystem? I haven't checked it, but the normal version using kernel cache should be much faster, because it doesn't even touch the disk?

[dead]