Sure but use a real photo and someone will come with a copyright claim. The AI photo is the safest option.
xigoi 10 hours ago||
How about not using a photo at all if it’s not relevant to the article?
zhivota 20 hours ago|||
It's not even that hard to make AI output images that don't look like AI slop either, just have to use some "in the style of" or "as if it was taken with a film camera" types of modifiers. This is what confuses me about AI slop, not only did you use the lowest effort method, you didn't even put a minimal amount of effort into making it work well.
pixel_popping 1 day ago||
It's genuinely triggering rage to see this on a "serious" article.
testertester00 1 day ago||
[dead]
darig 1 day ago||
[dead]
richwater 1 day ago||
[flagged]
xnx 1 day ago|
This problem is 99% cops and 1% flock.
parl_match 1 day ago||
verkada (a building access systems company), had multiple incidents of stalking of employees by other employees, using their own installation in their own hq
none of them were cops
justin66 21 hours ago|||
It's sort of 50/50.
orthecreedence 23 hours ago||
No? A mass surveillance apparatus is a pretty enormous problem.