Can you please not post like this to HN? It's against quite a few of the site guidelines, including:

"Eschew flamebait. Avoid generic tangents."

"Please don't fulminate."

If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules when posting here, we'd appreciate it.

Sure, but what is the scale vs what has been done with Pan/Sui etc. by Alph, Amaz, others?

[flagged]

I bet the first failure of a large stablecoin will be fun (for external onlookers at least).

Only virtual fiat is useful everything is garbage.

The stable coins in question are absolut idiotic. You can't just have billions and trillions of dollars/euros/fiat in some bank and not do anything with it while everyone else is using your stable coins.

It motivates these companes to invest the fiat they have to hold, which adds risk which wasn't there before.

Just make it a real digital fiat from central banks.

But than what did you win? Instead of having your banking ssystem in place with certifications, bank licenses etc. you have nothing to replace it with just bare digital fiat.

Smart contracts don't work.

Now what? a new whole parallel ecosystem? For what?

What would drive a love of technology over ones peers in the formative years? And when society further obstructs the path to working with one's interests by further exposure to the peer group and its passions, why would the society become beloved by the individual? People demonstrably cannot be put on the path of caring for others without being showed that they are seen and cared about themselves, and no intro to philosophy, or ethincs for graduates course, has ever focused on that aspect.

Not to say that all who love technology are outcasts, but hoping for reaching the ones behaving problematically by talking about the academic sport of philosophy or related disciplines doesn't seem effective if the goal is more pro-social behaviour.

Technological nihilism, in a way. The displacement of the philosophical foundations of science and western civilization in the last hundred plus years is still becoming manifest. We've been coasting on the fumes for a long time!

if everyone was surveilled all the time, real, harmful crime would drop. That assumes that every person doing the surveilling is completely unflawed and the law is a perfect, 100% just computer program. Deluded idealists is a charitable descriptor.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2025/09/03/ai-st...

nerds gonna nerd i guess..