Top
Best
New

Posted by 1vuio0pswjnm7 14 hours ago

Reid Hoffman says SpaceX 'not an AI company', xAI 'complete train wreck'(fortune.com)
221 points | 255 commentspage 3
excalibur 13 hours ago|
> The timing of Hoffman’s remarks is pointed. SpaceX went public on June 12th, with AI central to its IPO narrative. Within days, the company announced it was acquiring Cursor, the AI coding tool. Hoffman’s read: that’s not proof of AI capability, but evidence of its absence. “You could almost think of it as the IAC of AI,” he said, invoking the serial acquisitions roll-up strategy of Barry Diller’s internet-era conglomerate. “Use the market cap to buy AI companies and try to buy your way into relevance.”

Sounds like securities fraud to me.

1vuio0pswjnm7 14 hours ago||
"The pitch deck, he revealed, describes Manas as “an AI drug discovery factory for creating monopolies” legally permissible, he notes, because pharmaceutical IP functions as a sanctioned monopoly by design."
epistasis 14 hours ago||
What a weird way to describe what is just another drug company, exactly the same way every single drug company functions.
1vuio0pswjnm7 12 hours ago||
He's got it all figured out, like Myhrvold and Intellectual Ventures
rvz 14 hours ago||
OpenAI investor Reid Hoffman says competitor xAI is a "complete train wreck".

Why listen to these people when they have a clear vested interest in talking nonsense about their competitors?

These comments from investors are predictable and it is obvious why they keep doing this.

sixothree 13 hours ago|
Did you not see literally every other top level comment in this thread?
rvz 13 hours ago||
Look at the time I posted my comment.

I commented 51 mins ago when there were around two comments here that were not talking about Reid's bias against xAI.

5 more comments appeared afterwards in roughly the same timeframe when I posted my reply and that was the first mention of Reid being an OpenAI investor which is enough to explain his obvious bias here.

6stringmerc 14 hours ago||
Fantastic insight! I take his opinion as having the most merit possible in this context. Why?

Because LinkedIn is also a train wreck and game recognizes game.

winfredJa 14 hours ago|
linkedin is not a $3T company though.
nevf1 13 hours ago||
Whilst nobody can dispute the inordinate success Hoffman has had in building and scaling LinkedIn and his work on Greylock, his associations with the Epstein files, previous spats with Musk, and his warped political views makes me question anything he says.

In this instance, I see it as nothing more than a self-serving and politically motivated diss against Musk, even if the substance of what he says is true.

pixel_popping 11 hours ago||
xAI complete train wreck maybe, however their models are really great, in conversational Grok 4.3 is my favorite recently, followed by Opus 4.8. It's not that great for coding purposes tho.
maipen 11 hours ago|
> It's not that great for coding purposes tho.

I found it to be otherwise, but it was not a complete hands off experience. Which is ideal for me, I like to be specific and grok 4.3 and composer are great code monkeys.

Opus and GPT are the models you want right now, for "I have no idea how to build this, so figure it out".

Fricken 13 hours ago||
Last week Yann LeCun called xAI a "failure"

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/18/yann-lecun-elon-musk-xai-fai...

zulux 13 hours ago|
>>LeCun, who was previously Meta chief AI scientist,

Well, I guess he should know.

moralestapia 12 hours ago||
I wish there as chrome extension that surrounds pdf file names with something like the infamously misused (((...))).

So that you are reminded, as you read about them, that they were one of Epstein "associates". Nothing wrong with that, of course, I'm sure it was only business deals, etc...

globalnode 14 hours ago|
What a terrible world to live in. Of course hes trying to convince Gen Z of the "opportunities" they have. Opportunities for him and his oligarch friends to make a load of $. Cant wait for this AI bubble to crash and dissolve a bunch of undeserved wealth.
More comments...