Top
Best
New

Posted by htrp 1 day ago

Anthropic says Alibaba illicitly extracted Claude AI model capabilities(www.reuters.com)
745 points | 1201 commentspage 15
dev1ycan 12 hours ago|
It's so funny how LLMs, which trained on millions of books, stolen (and even if they weren't, which they were, pirated from online pirate sites like libg and annas, they didn't have consent for the VAST majority of them), and stolen code, and stolen comments, etc.

Now complain about their stuff getting "stolen"... lol.

serverlessmania 18 hours ago||
And Alibaba is releasing the full model weights open source under Apache 2.0, Anthropic… fuck that company.
nacozarina 8 hours ago||
Thieves complaining about theft and then gaslighting the victims; rich, but not smooth.
jrflowers 1 day ago||
I like that they use “illicit” and “fraudulent” like as if model distillation is illegal and giving them money and then doing whatever they want with the output of their publicly accessible models (which Anthropic does not own) is… also illegal?

“Anthropic, red faced after unattended ice cream cone eaten by ants on park bench, once again demands government pick it as forever winner, adds ‘no take backsies’”

gigioc 13 hours ago||
Please, honor among thieves!
ProAm 1 day ago||
Says the company that is involved in the largest copyright heists of all time to build it's product.
bilsbie 11 hours ago||
Can we finally just nope out of this closed model of AI development?

It should all be open source with each gain shared and celebrated by all.

api 13 hours ago||
AI is awesome tech but it’s also to some extent mass piracy. The models are trained on huge amounts of material with dubious or non existent rights.

I have a hard time being concerned about “you pirated my piracy.”

I hold the view that many of these models should not be copyrightable. Anthropic and all the others talk about “safety” but you never hear them bring up attribution of the data that trained the model or compensation of anyone for it.

rvz 1 day ago||
Notice how Anthropic is now scapegoating Chinese models providers like Alibaba and outright accusing them of distilling their models.

Whether if it is true or not, this is part of their effort into using them as an example to scare everyone into getting congress to ban powerful models from being accessed outside of the US and also banning powerful local models from being released.

Anthropic does not care about you, and they are not your friends.

sheepscreek 1 day ago||
I think it’s more than that. Piecing together the perspective of a few commentators in this post - it’s plausible Anthropic is trying to shift the narrative from US vs. Rest of the world to US vs. China.

In other words, they want to sell Fable or future more powerful models to rest of the world (presumably all future models are going to be more powerful than current gen). One way they can sell this is to the government is by scapegoating China (which is their primary concern anyway).

This is working on the presumption that non-US companies form a material portion of their current revenue.

re-thc 1 day ago||
> Whether if it is true or not

If it was just "that easy" then I doubt only "Chinese models" would be doing it and we'd already be packed with competition.

Distilling might be a thing but it isn't a free win.

skeledrew 1 day ago||
Only China really has the resources (multiple labs invested in the space), culture (Asians are generally collectively-inclined, so sharing is in their core) and political bent (there will be no diplomatic repercussions) to put up a fight.
re-thc 1 day ago||
> Only China really has the resources (multiple labs invested in the space)

That's not the point. Why is it a country thing? There are plenty of non-China startups in this space having resources at that scale. The "China" has resources is some "Western media narrative" speak. So Meta should have won a long time ago? Or xAI?

> culture (Asians are generally collectively-inclined, so sharing is in their core)

Just stereotype it? So we've gone from China -> "Asian"? Then where is your Korean or Japanese model etc? And somehow you know they're sharing.

> political bent (there will be no diplomatic repercussions) to put up a fight

More inferring from "Western media news"?

Where's the reality?

The media hyped up Gemini / Google TPU free-win last year. How did that go?

skeledrew 23 hours ago||
> Why is it a country thing?

Because the China vs US geopolitical situation is a thing. Meta is a social media company, not an AI company, and they direct their focus as such. xAI just never got serious traction so now they're selling their compute. Also if a US company were caught distilling, I think Anthropic could actually take them to court, and I'd guess they don't want that kind of PR.

> Just stereotype it?

Is China not Asian? Are Asians not generally collective/cooperative, as opposed to individualistic/competitive?

The "and" that joined those 3 items is very important: it means you can't pull them apart and address them independently as they each contribute to the context. I'm not too sure about Korea, but in a way Japan is a US colony in all but name. Both are very much politically intertwined with the West (along with RoC/Taiwan), which means nothing major that may be against US interest happens.

The reality is that China and the US are essentially in a trade war, where the latter is trying its best to keep the former in the Dark Ages, because "national security", but the former is refusing to take it lying down and continues to make progress regardless[0], because they have the resources and will.

[0] https://thenextweb.com/news/china-lineshine-supercomputer-to...

More comments...