Top
Best
New

Posted by notRobot 5 hours ago

Instagram is incorporating users' photos in ads for Meta Glasses(twitter.com)
213 points | 91 commentspage 2
tantalor 4 hours ago|
Comment on that thread:

> This seems entirely counter-productive and creepy.

Apt description of Instagram in general.

jmorenoamor 2 hours ago||
Why? Because they can, and they will.

Leaving these services looks difficult or impossible, until you do it, and the world just keeps spinning.

fullshark 5 hours ago||
Ten years ago maybe this causes outrage, but I'm not sure anyone cares in 2026 including potential customers.
wartywhoa23 2 hours ago||
IG users were the proverbial product on this free-to-partake vanity fair since its inception.
halflife 2 hours ago||
I actually find this incredible, since this highlights how desperate they are to advertise these glasses
subygan 1 hour ago||
As horrible as it sounds.

For the median user, It really is impossible to have an alternative to instagram / whatsapp / facebook. It is so easy to live in a bubble and say I'll host my own things. but a totally different thing to have a functioning network effects machine.

ricardofranco 4 hours ago||
Something similar happened to me a few years ago. my photo was used in an ad, making it look like I was selling stuff and promoting a page I’d never even clicked on... absolutely mind-blowing....
quadrature 4 hours ago||
Is there actual proof that they are doing this. Theres not much to go on in the tweet.
tantalor 4 hours ago||
Besides the proof in the screenshot? What more do you want?

Do you think this user is faking it?

quadrature 3 hours ago||
Yes people frequently fake screenshots on social media. I'd want either a screenshot from a credible person, reporting from a journalist, trusted blogger, company statement etc.
dabinat 14 minutes ago|||
Well the company statement is that they say they can do this in their terms of service. It seems very plausible that Meta is doing what their TOS says they’re allowed to do.
tantalor 2 hours ago||||
I'm not a journalist, but I don't think a reporter would go much further than "one user said...".

There is no need for fact checking an individual source, other than to verify the reporting is accurately representing what they said.

quadrature 1 hour ago||
A credible journalist would not entertain writing a story based on a screenshot some random user posts on social media.
vee-kay 2 hours ago|||
[dead]
ryan42 4 hours ago|||
yes, it happened to me recently.

The photo wasn't mine, but showed a profile photo of one of my facebook friends, and it had the glasses and said "On my way!"

edoceo 4 hours ago||
And they have a history of doing this. And their privacy/ToS allows it.
glimshe 2 hours ago||
When you don't pay for the product... YOU are the product.
Zhyl 4 hours ago|
The XKCD for this exact scenario is 14 years old.

https://xkcd.com/1150/

fullshark 4 hours ago||
Kind of a stretch, these days can't imagine anyone that views instagram as a place to store their cherished photos also.
jijijijij 2 hours ago|||
Yeah, and then the charging businesses start selling your stuff anyway. So really, it's the comic creator, who is naive.
doublerabbit 4 hours ago||
Some reason that strip doesn't load for me.
nicce 3 hours ago||
It is just saying that if you don't pay for something, you are the product. I think it still fits well here.
More comments...