Top
Best
New

Posted by mfiguiere 19 hours ago

GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra will be in Codex(twitter.com)
https://x.com/haider1/status/2073695124220006575, https://xcancel.com/haider1/status/2073695124220006575
393 points | 356 commentspage 3
lawgimenez 18 hours ago|
No Twitter, what’s he responding to?
asn0 17 hours ago||
https://xcancel.com/haider1/status/2073695124220006575#m
asn0 15 hours ago||
Corrected link https://xcancel.com/thsottiaux/status/2073933490513752151
Cider9986 17 hours ago||
Check out LibRedirect or Predirect (MV3), it automatically redirects youtube, X, etc links to privacy-respecting frontends.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44344246

107 comments, 1 year ago.

threecheese 3 hours ago||
The LibRedirect link in that post is 404
Cider9986 2 minutes ago||
https://github.com/libredirect/browser_extension
jquery 18 hours ago||
Will individual subscribers have access?
AussieWog93 17 hours ago|
I would assume yes - their goal is to capture consumer subscribers. Claude are going to take Fable away, and they're going to swoop in and give it to us.
kirubakaran 17 hours ago||
This is why I don't think Fable will be taken away. Not for long anyway.
llelouch 16 hours ago|||
Still avialable through the API. According to people that have tried both Fable nad 5.6, Fable is clearly better at coding. So i expect a lot of people to pay extra for it.
kirubakaran 15 hours ago|||
But if 5.6 is better than Opus, Claude Code Max plan users will switch to OpenAI Codex en masse. Using Fable at API pricing is expensive
neon_diogenes 4 hours ago||
You’re not kidding. I ran out of Fable tokens a couple days ago, loaded up $70 just to finish the task we were working on, and burned through it in about 15 minutes.

Aaaaand it’s gone.

holoduke 14 hours ago|||
Who is going to pay API prices for using Claude? I don't know one single company. It's not gonna happen.
satvikpendem 12 hours ago|||
Most enterprises are already paying API prices as Anthropic are forcing them to above a certain company size.
_zoltan_ 8 hours ago||||
Every large enterprise?

Who do you think pays for your subscription's actual usage?

stavros 9 hours ago|||
Every company above 150 employees has to pay API prices as Anthropic won't give you subscriptions.
ashraymalhotra 17 hours ago|||
I love how competition is great for customers!
shevy-java 9 hours ago||
They really try to force everyone into AI.

Next logical step: mandatory age sniffing but it can only be done if you have AI. Those not complying will be denied access to the www.

elAhmo 10 hours ago||
Back to terrible naming from Open AI.
throwaway27448 13 hours ago||
Bruh when did understanding chatbots become like following pokemon? Wtf does any of this this mean. Tf is sol? Tf is ultra? Tf is codex? Tf happened to descriptive nomenclature?
chkmr 13 hours ago||
Maybe you jest, but I'll bite.

> Tf is sol?

It's a proper noun: the name given to their latest and greatest model. Means "Sun" in Latin. Similar to how Anthropic has been naming its models Fable, Opus, Sonnet etc. Their other models are called Terra (Latin: Earth) and Luna (Latin: Moon) [0].

> Tf is ultra?

The name of the "harness" around the model. It'll use deeper thinking, subagents and all that jazz in response to a prompt. Other options include max, high, medium etc I suppose.

> Tf is codex?

"Coding agent" similar to Claude Code [1], something with a more descriptive name.

> Tf happened to descriptive nomenclature?

Something like GLM-4-32B-0414-128K (not made up [2]) doesn't quite roll off the tongue I suppose.

[0]: https://openai.com/index/previewing-gpt-5-6-sol/

[1]: https://openai.com/codex/

[2]: https://docs.z.ai/guides/llm/glm-4-32b-0414-128k

throwaway27448 13 hours ago||
Of course I understand all this, but why the cuteness? Why not just say "<whatever the hell sol is supposed to imply> 2 agent?

> Something like GLM-4-32B-0414-128K (not made up [2]) doesn't quite roll off the tongue I suppose.

Surely it would sell better though if they could communicate what they're selling?

> Coding agent" similar to Claude Code [1], something with a more descriptive name.

Does this really need branding at all? Surely claude should sell itself if it can work as an agent. And if it is a specific model, what tasks is it trained to do? can we see the fucking training to make this money worth it? Or am I just another sucker buying nikes?

All of this hand waving makes me nauseated. People should buy value, not vibes.

cbg0 12 hours ago|||
It's a post on twitter, not a press release.
throwaway27448 12 hours ago||
Branding is far more subsistent and meaningful than either lol. They just want to paint themselves as gods. But they are producing software, not magical beings, and we should see them as salesmen, not gods. Not to mention they'd probably sell more software if people could understand their product lineup
bux93 10 hours ago|||
It's to create an in-group, and you are in the out-group.
satvikpendem 12 hours ago|||
If you follow AI news you'd know what these are easily, or even just look at the top posts in the last month on HN to see.

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=pastMonth&page=2&prefix=fa...

throwaway27448 11 hours ago||
This wouldn't be necessary with descriptive product names
satvikpendem 3 hours ago||
There is a reason brand names exist and why Coca-Cola does not say syrupy fizzy caramel like drink on the can.
tw1984 15 hours ago||
they better get that out fast, it will become totally meaningless when the next GLM gets there first.

more competition is always good for consumers.

yeychenne 5 hours ago||
[flagged]
jocelyner 15 hours ago||
[dead]
finecode 12 hours ago||
[flagged]
jj0jj0 13 hours ago|
[dead]
More comments...