Top
Best
New

Posted by speckx 15 hours ago

98% isn't much(whynothugo.nl)
473 points | 313 commentspage 10
casey2 14 hours ago|
Design bloggers are about to reinvent the concept of availability https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_availability#Percentage_c...

Software standards are way too low these days. If you can't do at least 5 9s in everything you ship get out of the industry and humanity will be better off.

isolli 11 hours ago||
It reminds me of when people argued against covid restrictions saying that the virus had a 99% survival rate. A disease with a 1% infection fatality rate is a terrible disease!

Full disclosure: I also argued against covid restrictions, but not with this terrible argument.

groby_b 9 hours ago||
"Truly robust engineering isn’t about what works for most; it’s about gracefully handling the edge cases"

Not really. Truly robust engineering includes a cost-benefit analysis of which edge cases you handle. We don't live in a world of unlimited time & money.

throwitaway222 12 hours ago||
I mean 2% have their javascript turned off (either on purpose or caused by failing extensions). 5% are behind corporate proxies that block your domain. Are you going to host the site on substack also so those 5% can access it?
ClumsyPilot 10 hours ago||
This is a basic ontological error, author conflates reliability and suitability

>> If a website uses fancy new browser features and works for 98% of the population

>> If an employer pays their employees 98% of the times, I definitely wouldn’t want to work there

Are you sure about that? 2% of the population has no bank account, will your employer agree to pay in cash?

These are different scenarios -> your employer likely cannot pay some percentage of the population; but that’s not the same as the process randomly failing (which may be worse or better depending in some cases)

theresistor 13 hours ago||
I had this argument with people working on VR headsets, where a physical parameter was designed to cover the 5th to 95th percentile. I had to point out that flat-out excluding 10% of the population is a pretty crappy starting point...
mellosouls 14 hours ago||
Off topic (and at risk of being downvoted), I don't think I'll ever get a better chance to insist here that

"99 and a half won't do"

https://youtu.be/1QVJCjbgM-s

Holy Disciples

Trying to Make a Hundred

marking-time 13 hours ago|
Thank you :)
daveguy 11 hours ago||
Or, phrased another way: there's a reason why we consider basic availability in nines and 2 nines is still considered pretty bad. 99% uptime means being down over 7 hours each month.
system2 12 hours ago||
When I read the title, I instantly thought about these crappy Ai api status pages. People somehow are forced to accept that 98% uptime is alright.
sneak 13 hours ago|
Venues did kick out a lot more than 2% of their existing customers until they upgraded their bloodstream. Website visitors can upgrade their browser.
panny 9 hours ago|
>Venues did kick out a lot more than 2% of their existing customers until they upgraded their bloodstream.

Only temporarily. Some never mRNAed their bloodstream, then everyone with brain fog forgot about the Trump vaccine and the new normal went back to normal.

More comments...