Top
Best
New

Posted by aanet 4 days ago

Is this the end of the once-mighty GoPro?(amateurphotographer.com)
204 points | 422 commentspage 3
dabinat 14 hours ago|
I remember using these on movie sets as crash cams - a cheap camera that could be mounted on something fast-moving so you could get cool action shots without risking the $100k primary camera. But the main selling point for this use-case is that they were cheap, and that’s a fight the Chinese companies will always win.
Grombobulous 19 hours ago||
There’s a really good video out there about how GoPro fumbled their position:

https://youtu.be/frrhSJF__Mc

Insta360 is the company that has essentially taken over this space.

hatsunearu 17 hours ago||
IMO the image quality on GoPro is still the best. I don't understand why people say it's horrible. For flat video it outperforms Insta360 and definitely DJI.
aanet 4 days ago||
> While GoPro action cameras are built to withstand shock, the brand itself is looking distinctly shaky right now. Latest reports[1] are that founder Nicholas Woodman is propping the company up by extending it a loan of his own money to the tune of $20 million, at an annual interest rate of 6.5%, while a buyer is desperately sought. It’s believed GoPro may not survive the year without a new owner or fresh injection of cash, with Woodman’s intervention acting as a stopgap rather than bail-out per se.
blitzar 3 hours ago||
Tale as old as time ... Make a bunch of money from your company, run it into the ground, be the hero that gets paid to keep it afloat.

The harder path is not being a shit CEO.

brookst 20 hours ago|||
$20m is really not much money to operate a company for 6 months. They must be close to break-even at least?
uxhacker 20 hours ago||
Is this because of the cost of memory or because the product is no longer competitive?
wyclif 20 hours ago|||
This article is not very satisfying to read, because it doesn't explore the reasons why GoPro is on the ropes.
antasvara 19 hours ago||||
From the financials, it's a little of both?

Memory is the acute issue causing their struggles; their most recent quarter saw a gross margin of 4.5% (that's revenue minus the direct cost of producing the cameras, divided by the revenue). That's a hefty fall from their previous margin of ~31%. This contributed to their operating loss of $57M in the last 3 months.

Thag being said, they haven't had a positive quarterly operating income since the last quarter of 2022, even when the margin was higher than 4.5%. So it's not like they were succeeding before the memory crunch, just losing money slower.

whycome 20 hours ago|||
Adventure cams lose a market when people can’t afford to go on adventures?
dd_xplore 13 hours ago||
My only gripe with GoPros is lack of external mic like dji ecosystem.
keiferski 20 hours ago||
Red Bull really ran the marketing playbook that GoPro should have done: become known for athletes doing extreme things. Instead they stayed too technical and product-based and didn't build a brand beyond "we make action cameras."
harrall 19 hours ago||
Red Bull doesn’t just market, they bankroll and support.

Most companies just sponsor a team or something, but Red Bull has paid for the baseline infrastructure of many sports.

r3trohack3r 20 hours ago|||
There is an old saying that Red Bull is a marketing company that happens to sell energy drinks
fy20 20 hours ago|||
Well that is pretty much true. It's founder was a marketing director for a consumer goods brand.
keiferski 20 hours ago|||
yep, and there's no reason why a company with that brand couldn't be selling action cameras, or shoes (Nike), or anything adjacent to extreme sports
shmeeed 12 hours ago||
GoPro would fit right in there with the Red Bull brand, as a matter of fact.
atourgates 19 hours ago|||
They really have tried.

They don't have the type of insane cashflow that RedBull does to sponsor tons of athletes and weird events, but their video contests are kind of a big deal in the action sports community.

AKA, their Line of the Winter[1] competition for skiing, or their Best Line conest for MTB[2] that they used to run. And they're the title sponsor for the GoPro Mountain Games[3].

They're still THE action sports cameara carried in a lot of outdoor equipment stores, but the Insta360 has really dominated social media recently, and their products are currently a better value for cost/performance.

[1] https://gopro.com/en/us/awards/line-of-the-winter [2] https://www.pinkbike.com/news/enter-the-gopro-of-the-world-b... [3] https://mountaingames.com/

TravisJamison 18 hours ago||
It’s not just the cash flow, it’s the margins.

Redbulls gross margins are probably 90%. It’s basically just water, sugar, and caffeine sold for $3.

You can do a lot of great promotions if the cost of your product is a rounding error.

crote 17 hours ago||
> It’s basically just water, sugar, and caffeine sold for $3.

... and some of their products don't even have sugar!

blitzar 3 hours ago||
you have to pay extra for that
usrusr 18 hours ago||
So how many minutes of that playbook do you suppose the annual budget of Gopro would be able to pay for?
donkeyboy 20 hours ago||
I had no ifea they were struggling. Tldr; their competitor Insta360 is battling them, and they have YoY revenue drop.

Gopro has this cool reliable aura around them. How could they he struggling? So bizarre

trentor 20 hours ago||
They rode the novelty train so hard they missed that everyone is doing it better than them now.
i_am_jl 20 hours ago|||
Their hardware is unimpressive and expensive, and their software is horrible.
wolrah 20 hours ago||
> and their software is horrible

As a long-time GoPro owner who recently added an Insta360 X5 to his collection, I can't really see any meaningful difference in software horribleness. They are both really really bad, with ads everywhere constantly pushing subscriptions to their cloud services.

At least with the normal cameras the software can be entirely ignored, I can take video from my Hero5 straight in to any ordinary NLE and go from there, but the 360 camera requires their software to convert from the native format to anything usable, even if I'm keeping it as 360 footage.

The worst part IMO for both is that they prioritize mobile apps over their PC software so if you want to edit on a computer like a normal reasonable person you lose features compared to idiotically doing things on a phone.

i_am_jl 19 hours ago|||
>The worst part IMO for both is that they prioritize mobile apps over their PC software so if you want to edit on a computer like a normal reasonable person you lose features compared to idiotically doing things on a phone.

This was my main gripe, but also:

* Image stabilization (Hypersmooth Pro/ReelSteady) as a subscription feature.

* Auto-rotate and orientation lock don't work in streaming mode. (I reported this as a bug on the Hero7, was told it was being looked at, still a problem on the Hero10 when I stopped paying attention)

For what it's worth, DJI does offer desktop software for their Osmo action cams. They also have a direct NAS/cloud storage upload option from the camera, as well as allowing normal transfer over USB or by pulling the SD card.

doix 19 hours ago||||
> The worst part IMO for both is that they prioritize mobile apps over their PC software so if you want to edit on a computer like a normal reasonable person you lose features compared to idiotically doing things on a phone.

This is my biggest issue as well. It's actually the one "real" thing I use the iPad for. It still gets the mobile app interface whilst being on a bigger screen and being almost usable.

matsemann 14 hours ago|||
Agree. Gopro recently released a DaVinci plugin for 360 videoes, which is great. But I often would like something in between the advanced DaVinci and the simple mobile editing. After the release of Max2, the Quik app got a big overhaul and is quite capable now. But it's still mobile, and Gopro Player (for desktop) is then now even further behind on capabilities. Same issue with Insta360 (both mobile and desktop, never tried Dji's apps)
cg5280 20 hours ago|||
Another area where an American technology brand is losing to the Chinese alternative. Alongside EVs, drones, robot vacuums, solar panels.
brk 20 hours ago|||
Not surprising, it's a commoditized sector.

On top of that, when GoPro first launched mobile phones generally did not have cameras capable of producing production-quality images, and especially video. 20 years later, the game is much different.

Remember the Flip video camera that was all the rage for like 2 years and then just disappeared when cellphones could shoot video? GoPro is like a rugged Flip, so it took a little longer for the world to catch up to them, but now there are lots of options, and a "cheap" sports camera that is 1/4 the price of a GoPro is good enough, even if it only lasts 1/2 as long.

crote 17 hours ago|||
It's honestly embarrassing that our leaders still haven't realized why this is happening, and still aren't taking any actions to prevent it from getting worse.

Giving billions of free money to shareholders of Intel & friends is going to do absolutely nothing to change the tide. Want domestic manufacturing? Invest in building a JLCPCB alternative: automated to the fullest extent possible in order to save fractions of a cent on ops, then operated on a razor-thin margin but making up for it in volume.

Chinese people aren't the lazy dumb manual workers we have long pretended they are. After we have freely given them all of our engineering knowledge with outsourcing, they are now beating us on the free market. If we don't internalize this, stop with the silly competition-destroying tariffs, and try to compete again, we are doomed to slide into irrelevancy - and we've got only ourselves to blame.

Alien1Being 20 hours ago|||
Beaten on quality and price by competitors.

The same thing is happening to BMW, Toyota,Mercedes...

romanovcode 20 hours ago||
> How could they he struggling?

They are just not as good. I bought GoPro10 ~5 years ago and it constantly overheats. Very unreliable. It was the first and last time I bought GoPro.

ltbarcly3 18 hours ago||
It's a testament to how broken modern business practices are that GoPro can sell 1.2 Million cameras per year and still go out of business.

It's possible they are just poorly run, and they spend more in R&D than they recoup in revenue, but I strongly suspect they were set up to only be profitable if they sold millions of cameras per year as an attempt to maximize profits at that volume, without consideration of other scenarios.

knes 19 hours ago||
no one is mentioning DJI? they are also crushing go pro with DJI Osmo lineup, action or nano.
radicality 17 hours ago|
Ah damn I just bought their new Mission One a few weeks ago (upgrading from a Hero 10). Already quite angry though since it seems the batteries are basically the same shape for both, except the connector is in a different location, so the 3 existing batteries I have for the Hero 10 are not compatible, which is a shitty move from GoPro. Well I guess either way I won’t be buying gopros anymore in the future.
More comments...