Posted by marukodo 4 hours ago
Does anyone have a resource for something like this but under a libre/free license?
Assuming user marukodo is the creator of these cards, could you contact me offline? (email is in my profile) I've got some questions.
???
(I remember when computer science cards were 7⅜″×3¼″)
(So in a way, email could be used offline with IPoAC.)
For very small runs of 1-10 decks, I've used places like makeplayingcards.com. The cards are print-on-demand quality, but far better than printing at home on cardstock. (My preferred home printing method for prototyping is to use custom labels and cheap Magic the Gathering bulk commons.)
We did a card game that was printed by Panda Game Manufacturing in China. Since we did about 5k units, they used traditional offset printing on 300gsm blackcore (similar stock to Magic the Gathering). But the minimum order quantity is 500 or 1000 units. Costs per deck were vastly cheaper than the print-on-demand decks.
There is a company in Florida called ShuffledInk that will do custom cards. I've used them for a 50 deck order. Cards were more expensive, but did save a little on shipping. It took a couple months longer than printing in China, but the print-on-demand card quality was higher.
For all of these printing methods, preparation was the same. Design the cards in Illustrator, and follow the printers directions to prepare the individual files (PDF or PNG, depending on the service). MPC has a tool that you use to upload the images and layout the deck. Panda and ShuffledInk take the PDFs or Illustrator files for layout, then send you a digital proof to approve.
I do not understand how to play these cards, are these the backs? I thought maybe the number of dots is the number - oh wait, there are 12 dots. Is the "bird" a suite or a Royal? etc
I think the graphics are very visually appealing; thank you for sharing.
It appears the exercise is more one of representing the concepts as an info graphic.
The other sides of the cards are text explanation.
“Graphic designers have a good, often innate, understanding of patterns, mathematics, logic, and balance.” Shouldn’t be surprising to anyone—that’s like being surprised a good programmer also has a good understanding of logic.
This reads like a very thinly veiled of showing off your project and the process of designing it. A bit dishonest if you ask me.
Honestly there are worse things to write about. I too am a hard nerd who migrated from backend to frontend and dabbled in design. The discovery of typography, design rules, graphing principles, etc. felt to me like a revelation far outstripping the initial project(s) that inspired them. I read _The Elements of Typographic Style_ (Bringhurst) and Tufte and I read Nielsen's blog every day (back when it was at useit.com).
I wish in retrospect I'd written an article like this one; the wonder is genuine, and the satisfaction from the discovery of heretofore-invisible but trivially demonstrable rules is significant.
Finally, would point out that the author of this piece currently does not have any cards for sale, because they are sold out. :) So not only would it be ethically _ok_ to write an interesting piece that as a side-effect did some art self-promotion (if that were for example the reason the cards sold out,) but we know that, now and going forward, this article _cannot serve as a sales funnel_ because there is nothing being sold!
So, no, this article is fine and the cards are very interesting. I wish I'd been able to order a set, frankly