Top
Best
New

Posted by surprisetalk 8 hours ago

Three ways people respond to a problem (other than solving it)(improvesomething.today)
154 points | 80 commentspage 2
barrenko 4 hours ago|
The problems you have are solutions to the problems you don't want to admit to yourself are actually having.
blitzar 5 hours ago||
Not my problem - the best kind of problem.
andsoitis 7 hours ago||
There’s a fourth: deny
1970-01-01 7 hours ago||
There's a 0th: empathy. They want to hear you say you heard them, hear you say the problem is a problem, and have you say the problem is making things harder.
pessimizer 5 hours ago||
The cool thing about this one is that you don't even have to understand what they said, just learn how to repeat it back to them with a sad look on your face.
ActionHank 7 hours ago|||
My colleagues like this one.
metalman 7 hours ago|||
or perhaps thats the first response?

in any case, as a hard core problem solver who is currently overwhelmed with problems I am bieng forced into no choice paragmatic responses. where I have lost any reserve capacity, deflect, move, deny a problem and get some rest, eat, shave the yak, before rejoining the fray with enough energy to perform is just part of the routine now. ie: triage or go under, which may be habit forming

jagged-chisel 7 hours ago||
Denying the problem exists is not the same.

Denying that the problem is a “problem” would be.

In the first case, the affected do nothing because there is no problem.

In the second, it’s “not a problem” because they did a thing and moved it elsewhere.

metalman 3 hours ago||
the other possibility is that the problem is somebody elses, rendering it invisible and therefor potentialy usefull in it's own right
black6 6 hours ago||
The company for which I work seems to be run by engineers. When learning to be an engineer you're taught that doing nothing is always a valid option. In Army leadership courses we were taught that ANY decision is better than NO decision.

My company is stifled by a bunch of engineers in leadership positions who always choose to defer up the chain rather than make a decision themselves.

mnahkies 1 hour ago||
As another commentator said "do nothing" is a decision. There's a distinction between "don't make a decision and hope someone else makes a decision" and "we acknowledge we're deciding to do nothing about X until/unless Y"

The people in leadership positions should be active participants, and not all decisions will be ones they are are able to make locally - but they should feel comfortable to present a POV and recommendation/tradeoffs upwards when that's the case. If the buck stops with them then they should be aware that "do nothing" is a decision that they are making.

jcs 2 hours ago|||
The person who decides owns the risk. The cost of waiting is spread across the whole team, so escalating is usually the safer move for the individual.
an0malous 5 hours ago||
“Do nothing” can be a decision
IshKebab 6 hours ago||
The most common response I see is "unfortunately this problem is impossible for us to fix because I can't be bother.. err I mean because of these technical reasons. Yes definitely that."
josefritzishere 5 hours ago|
hug of death?