Top
Best
New

Posted by secretslol 3 days ago

What AI did to stackoverflow in a graph(data.stackexchange.com)
477 points | 579 commentspage 11
fHr 3 days ago|
joining the space and getting to know this site in 2015ish it was toxic af, well deserved
hnthrow10282910 3 days ago||
Honestly SO helped me a lot in Uni 10 years ago. However I was banned 5+ times for just asking a normal question with attempts at answering. Can’t say I’m surprised. It was not welcoming, massively exclusive and had a rude community. RIP
mid-kid 3 days ago||
Except for covid, it seems the decline was already there.
hilariously 3 days ago||
Yep, SO was dying before the GPTs - in some ways it was baked in the original SO design - to become the canonical source of information about programming stuff.

Many people talk about the negativity, and they are right, but I think the reason more than anything is the waiting. On SO a good question might get answered in minutes (if it was easy and someone was karma farming) but it could be days or weeks for general purpose stuff; compare that to a few seconds for an LLM its a no brainer.

Ekaros 3 days ago||
Somehow I feel that whole idea was 50% broken from start. In field changing as fast as programming you simply cannot have canonical source that is done. There are areas which are constant or slow moving. But too many others are in churn. Trying to apply same rules for both is clearly insanity. And this is really the failure of SO...

Maybe if in some cases stuff actually got deprecated and points did actively decay it might have worked... But can't remove power from those who had it for years...

hilariously 3 days ago||
You also have to think that SO was very early in gamification and changing things around that never got political will afaict - people love their points.
elif 3 days ago|||
The decline you're talking about is roughly 168 to 145, or about 2.2% per year over 5 years.

That's hardly a death sentence. More likely just the gradual adoption of higher level frameworks and languages with less ugly parts.

zh3 3 days ago|||
Indeed, decline appears to accelerate significantly in 2023 so seems likely that's AI helping things along.
dumberquestions 3 days ago||
The trend might've stalled or even reversed if it weren't for AI, we can't just assume the same end was written in stone.
casey2 3 days ago||
There's always going to be lots of latent insecurity among amateurs when a pro shows up.

Honestly because of this and the relative lack of actual pros on the site, real pros will get pushed out and the site will actually build a collection of misinformation. That's probably why pros feel that software quality has dropped so much in since stackoverflow.

pknerd 3 days ago||
Finally, something good done by AI against these modern-day dictators and pharaohs.
inigyou 3 days ago|
Careful - the LLM companies are also modern day dictators and pharoahs.
uwagar 3 days ago||
that must be depressing to the owners and the investors.
econ 3 days ago||
Did anyone use the site search? Whenever I tried it it was disappointing. After ~two attempts I always went back to Google. Having the answer is of no use if you refuse to give it. LLMs didn't happen overnight. With all the aging questions, perhaps it was always doomed to be replaced by something.
mohammedmsgm 3 days ago||
no wonders, this will keep going on same trend
baist0 3 days ago||
The site for lazy code monkeys is dead.
deadbabe 3 days ago|
Now that Stack Overflow is mostly dead, what's the experience of asking a question there? Will you still get berated or are people chilled out?
More comments...