Top
Best
New

Posted by rexledesma 4 hours ago

Laguna S 2.1(poolside.ai)
158 points | 33 comments
Lwerewolf 1 hour ago|
Testing it now. At the very least, competitive with DS4-Flash indeed. On my small (and per Sol's words, _very_ semantically dense) C test codebase, it found things that only gpt-5.2 managed to find back in the day, but also made a stupidly incorrect initial observation that a memfd_create()/mmap was used for IPC (funnily enough - sol missed that as well in its review, until I pointed it out). Re: the claims vs deepseek v4 - both flash and pro are expected to get a "general availability" release very soon (i.e. well-"post-trained"), so things can change in a... well, flash, as per usual in the current environment.

Anyways, keep 'em coming.

ilc 1 hour ago|
What harness/quant did you use for testing?
Lwerewolf 1 hour ago||
nvfp4 mlx, literally barebones pi.

edit: on bigger tests, got it to loop pretty easily unfortunately, probably local settings.

sosodev 28 minutes ago||
What inference server are you using? They have a custom branch for llama.cpp, but I wouldn't be surprised at all if it still needs fixing.
mft_ 1 hour ago||
Looks impressive, and this size fits achievable home hardware.

That said, if someone would kindly quantise this down for the 64GB paupers, that would be appreciated. (I know there’s likely degradation, but some people reported good results with a 2 bit version of Qwen 3.5 122B, and this is starting from a higher point. Would be interesting to try, at least.)

Edit: someone in the process of doing so: https://huggingface.co/vcruz305/Laguna-S-2.1-GGUF

yogeshp 49 minutes ago||
They have also published smaller 33B model called Laguna XS 2.1, its Q4 gguf is 20GB.

https://huggingface.co/poolside/Laguna-XS-2.1-GGUF/tree/main

mft_ 19 minutes ago||
Thanks for flagging. From the few benchmarks I can find, it looks there or thereabouts with Qwen 3.6-35B-A3B, or maybe a touch below. I'm interested to compare a model that is a big jump larger with pretty impressive benchmarks, but more heavily quantized to fit.
verdverm 58 minutes ago||
The tool I've been using, llm-compressor, can quant models that do not fit in memory (use the sequential pipeline)

https://github.com/vllm-project/llm-compressor

my setup to help you on your way: https://github.com/verdverm/quantr

Though it seems these will not be needed as Poolside has published quants & dflash with their models.

river_otter 1 hour ago||
Hey, this model is not a joke! Exciting, we already got a usable PR of work out of it.

https://github.com/mozilla-ai/otari/pull/348

kamranjon 1 hour ago||
Whoa whoa whoa, 118b params, 8b active MOE, long context reasoning, open weights - music to my ears. Hadn't heard of this lab before but I am very excited, will definitely try this out tomorrow - this is a real sweet spot I think in terms of model size and performance.
svclaws 1 hour ago|
If the numbers are legitimate then our prayers have been heard
mchusma 1 hour ago||
Incredible. This is definitely the launch of the day. Just crushing Google's releases.

The pricing here is incredible. This is the first US release that's competitive with DeepSeek V4 Flash. Very excited about this.

benjiro29 24 minutes ago||
!! Be careful when testing the model.

A lot of people are testing it, and reporting disappointed results / benchmaxxxing claim. But do not realize that thinking has a issue with the default configuration.

Important - make sure that THINKING is enabled. By default it wasn't although I was passing the flag --default-chat-template-kwargs '{"enable_thinking": true}' in vllm recipe. The generation_config.json file that is included has by default max_new_tokens as 32k which seems to be cutting off thinking altogether so increase it. At first I was very disappointed with the output I was seeing, but once thinking is enabled, the code quality seems to be MUCH better. More real world testing to be done.

https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1v2pg99/laguna_...

Iolaum 2 hours ago||
Model Looks amazing!

Even more important, subjectively, is that this model will run very well on Strix Halo (e.g. Framework Desktop), DGX Spark kinds of devices. Looking forward to Unsloth dynamic mtp quants.

P.S. Looking at the HF release they already offer Q4_K_M and DFlash drafter for speculative decoding!

verdverm 57 minutes ago|
I hope all models going forward come with a dflash drafter so we don't have to train one up separately.
loolhahalmao 9 minutes ago||
happy the US has some counterweights to the Chinese labs, just need about half a dozen more.
SwellJoe 2 hours ago||
This is exactly the kind of model that's been needed in the middle. Realistically self-hosted, Good Enough intelligence, MoE so it's fast on limited bandwidth systems like Strix Halo and DGX Spark.

For a while there's been nothing to run on my Strix Halo that's notably better than what I can run on my dual 32GB GPU desktop (Gemma 4 or Qwen 3.6 dense models), but this seems likely to be the step up in size that actually works better than those.

docheinestages 37 minutes ago|
Any estimates of the performance (prompt processing and decoding tokens/s) on consumer hardware like Macbook Pro M-series?
More comments...