Top
Best
New

Posted by speerer 6 hours ago

Delayed Gratification – Proud to Be 'Last to Breaking News'(www.slow-journalism.com)
192 points | 103 commentspage 3
dwedge 5 hours ago|
Delayed gratification in my case was going through three captchas before I could even read the advert for a magazine. I know it's common but that disrespect for the customer irks me. How do people here find the content, is it worth trying again?
bcraven 5 hours ago|
if you like print journalism they're a good option with great print quality
dwedge 5 hours ago||
Thank you. I'll give them a try, if recommended I can forgive captchas because most companies don't really think about the negative user experience and it's unfair to punish one
whatever1 3 hours ago||
My problem is the opposite. When there are breaking news directly affecting me I have no way of getting them.

In between a myriad of notifications, fake social media posts, total collapse of local radio and tv, I have no idea of how to stay informed.

hamper653 4 hours ago||
Does this publication assume prior basic knowledge of the past months’ events?
akurilin 5 hours ago||
I enjoyed this magazine and subscribed to it for a while, but I wish there was a US-centered version of it for those of us on this side of the pond.
losvedir 5 hours ago||
Interesting. I wonder where the "sweet spot" on the delay is. I've given up online news and twitter and all that entirely, and just read my print Economist, which comes weekly. That already has the news somewhat delayed and presumably with less of a rush to report has a little more fact checking.

This advertises up to a 3 month delay. I do like that with that much lead time you can see not just news but sometimes a bit of the fallout and consequences.

Not a fan of the name, though. It reads like those Claude comments that I absolutely despise, where it feels the need to comment in a reactionary way to the feedback it's getting and changes it's making, rather than a forward-looking way that's cohesive with the new state of the codebase.

Maybe I missed it, but is there a back issue available I could page through, or even just a full story somewhere, that I could read so I can evaluate what I think of it?

speerer 5 hours ago|
Luckily the magazine came long before Claude, but I suppose your comparison describes their mission pretty well. It's a haven of non-AI writing.
johnhamlin 5 hours ago||
I generally wait for a story to get a full feature in The New Yorker or The Atlantic before I give it my attention. Similar concept
LoganDark 3 hours ago||
For a really long time, I've wanted a way to know just about products that have already actually released, rather than exciting innovations that'll be in the lab for years.

I haven't really had that problem with news.

misiti3780 3 hours ago||
This is a great idea (although it probably exists in other places) I'm reminded of Taleb's (2)

https://stevenbagley.net/blog/taleb-signal-to-noise.html

Barrin92 4 hours ago|
I wonder how much news related issues have to do with the way news is presented rather than the frequency at which you read the news. Daily news reading doesn't strike me as concerning given that getting a newspaper delivered in the mail in the morning was entirely normal practice and people didn't seem to experience the distress they do now. Between the 20s and up until the 70s almost every American household subscribed to a daily newspaper.

I figure the fact that news has turned into hedonic consumption is the much bigger deal. Neil Postman wrote a book, Amusing Ourselves to Death outlining how mass media turned all programming into entertainment programming. Everything is stimulating, emotionally charged etc. That to me seems to be the exhausting part.

So as for the title of this publication people really seem to be into the "delayed" part but I think the "gratification" part might be the problem

More comments...