Except it's not ~free, it cost ~$10. And no one in their right mind would ever exchange $10 for that crap output except in this brief moment that we're in because it's fun and surprising to see what will happen. The actual result is as close to useless as it's possible to be - it's not interesting in its own right, it's not aesthetically pleasing, nor funny, nor informative. It's just slop.
> @elonmusk 13h
> Yah
> 158 replies, 74 reposts, 1400 likes
Thanks Elon, you goofy fuck
Maybe nozzlegear wanted to suggest some importance on Musk remaining a bet-ter on the general tech, regardless of the competition?
> "Yah": slang spelling of the word "yeah" (which of course can also be used ironically)
> Merriam-Webster: "Yah": used to express disgust, contempt, defiance, or derision; probably imitative of the sound of retching
Testing, assessing, tasting...
We also do it when we build other things - this is just a different scale.
You cannot come and place your personal positions as assumptions. To me, there is absolutely no theft. And we cannot play a game of "Yes!"//"No!" here.
By the way: are we having a surge of this?
We do have a surge of pro-AI sealions, yes. Any objection is countered with one or more three word questions.
Very devoid of intelligence note.
> Any objection
Objections are arguments. That post did not start an argument - it was as ideological as the Brigades. Devoid of what we want to have here (I believe).
I have stated and do state: what is published is assumed as read (only, probably not read for lack of resources). If it is in the libraries, it is there to be read.
No bias. No speculation. Just facts!