Top
Best
New

Posted by emschwartz 3 hours ago

The Warp Agent CLI(www.warp.dev)
70 points | 37 comments
lexicality 1 hour ago|
I used to really like Warp, back when it was just a terminal. Then as they went more and more in on AI the actual terminal features became more and more buggy and I ended up having to go back to WezTerm.

Why is every company seemingly trying to re-implement agents themselves rather than making their product work with the existing ones?

hbn 1 hour ago||
Yeah I became a fan of Warp when they offered a terminal that treated the input as a normal text input field so I could use my normal keyboard text editing shortcuts.

But I understand that's not a viable business model. I'm back on iTerm2 now cause Warp isn't approved for use at my job (and never would be with all their AI pushing), and I've managed to pound iTerm 2 into something usable enough but I wish every terminal would copy Warp's text input style.

giancarlostoro 1 hour ago|||
I never used Warp, is the editing similar to PowerShell ISE's editing by chance? Powershell ISE is like a mix of a script editor and a PowerShell UI so you can script out some things or use the terminal directly.
lexicality 59 minutes ago||
The killer feature that got me into using it was the shell integration. Your prompt, input and command output are entirely separate entities rather than one single stream of text. It's like using a Jupyter notebook for the terminal.

That was also the thing that destroyed it for me, since navigating between history entries started getting more and more unreliable and sometimes clicking on the input box would randomly resize the entire window or move it between screens. I don't entirely know how they managed that one.

theappsecguy 53 minutes ago|||
does anyone know if the above experience and fluid vim-style behaviour can be replicated on something like ghostty? this was the killer feature of Warp imo and I saw no other benefits, but somehow not other terminal has been able to (or tried to) catch up
dxmachina 20 minutes ago|||
I also felt this way and after staring at the 900MB app package in disbelief started tearing out features using Claude with minimal supervision over the weekend.

It was also a bit of an experiment with a larger Rust codebase, which is outside my usual areas. I did pull out powershell since this was just for personal use on macOS. Been using it today and enjoying it in place of Ghostty, but merely an experiment and learning project:

https://github.com/dxmachina/warp-nine

yoyohello13 9 minutes ago|||
The writing was on the wall from the very start of Warp. I can't remember precisely what happened, but years ago when it was first announced there was something that required internet, or telemetry, or an account to use Warp. I noped out right there before I even tried further. It was always going to be bloatware.
ilivethere 8 minutes ago||
Same thing for Arc Browser. Sorry, why do I need an account to use a browser? That was a nope for me
turblety 32 minutes ago|||
100% agree. I've ended up building my own [1][2] mostly because I got annoyed the agent cli's are building remote control into the agents, instead of into the terminal. I really want the agent cli's to focus on being the best autonomous agents, then let me choose a great terminal that does all the extra.

Another great option (not mine) is Orca [3] and it's a lot more mature. Really nice to use.

1. https://github.com/markwylde/terminay

2. https://terminay.com

3. https://www.onorca.dev

lexicality 28 minutes ago|||
I'm glad it works for you, but I've got enough electron apps running on my computer already. I have to run a bunch for work and fully half my cpu is just electron at idle
efficax 1 hour ago|||
> Why is every company seemingly trying to re-implement agents themselves rather than making their product work with the existing ones?

You can't raise a $50 million series b on making a nice terminal. we already have lots of nice terminals for free

malvim 1 hour ago|||
We also have a bunch of agents and harnesses for free
dewey 1 hour ago||
As always it’s about the packaging not the individual components.
rvz 1 hour ago|||
Another reason why individual developers do not pay for their tools. This is one of the only professions that does this and they always pass the cost to the employer, who will pay for it until they cut costs.

So the open source code on GitHub is the library that agents need to train on, to do all the economically useful work for 1/100th of the cost or close to free.

That is where it is going and the raised money will be going to the agents.

dcchambers 12 minutes ago|||
> Why is every company seemingly trying to re-implement agents themselves rather than making their product work with the existing ones?

Why does any company do anything? Money, of course.

nekooooo 1 hour ago||
when i open a new tab in warp now it defaults to their agent and not my actual terminal. i'm going to have to switch back to something else, do you like wezterm?
lexicality 1 hour ago|||
I don't dislike it. The keybindings are a bit arcane and having to write the config in Lua rather than having a preferences panel is annoying (though spectacularly powerful), but I've settled in to it and being able to use ctrl-shift-p to control the entire terminal is nice.
Croaky 1 hour ago|||
This is configurable. In Settings search for "Default mode new sessions". You can select "Terminal", "Agent", or "Cloud Oz".
ArvidSu 1 hour ago||
My absolute favorite thing about Warp is the function that suggest a new command intelligently when the one I just ran failed or changes to the code when execution failed. Haven't been able to replicate that as smoothly in Ghostty which I really want to enjoy but honestly haven't really felt the same delight I got from Warp.
giancarlostoro 1 hour ago||
> Cloud agent handoff > Start work in the CLI, then hand it off to the cloud when you want to close your laptop. All cloud agents are tracked centrally and can be monitored and steered via the web so you can continue work on the go.

They hype up not needing a third party binary to remote and run agents against SSH'ed systems, but how does this "cloud agent" work then? Are they shelling you through their own back-end? Because that sounds bad and probably wrong? Maybe its a different use case.

Jonovono 1 hour ago||
The other day in warp I literally couldn't run `ls` because it kept interpreting it as a AI command. I still love warp, but some of the stuff is crazy.
jareklupinski 13 minutes ago|
i keep getting the opposite problem:

> please implement the fix

$ please: command not found

daveidol 2 hours ago||
So this is a competitor to something like OpenCode or Pi? I suspect for most developers, they are using Claude Code or Codex CLI mainly just so they don't have to pay-per-token and can use the subscription products - which I assume can't be done with Warp Agent?
madeofpalk 1 hour ago||
I suspect most developers don’t care too much about cost because they’re just using what their company is just paying for whatever enterprise subscription/billing.
9dev 1 minute ago||
Well someone (like me) has to make the decision what their developers get to use, and that was in fact informed by subscription pricing vs. API cost.
Instantnoodl 2 hours ago||
The codex and many other subscriptions can be used with other harnesses like OpenCode and pi. It's officially supported most of the time. Using my Codex and MiniMax sub just fine in pi.
ac29 1 hour ago||
Yeah Anthropic is the only company I am aware of that only allows subscription usage in first party products
qainsights 21 minutes ago||
Warp is bloated in recent releases. I just want an old warp, lightweight and fast. Returned to the default terminal.
hmokiguess 41 minutes ago||
I prefer the Orca / Herdr multiplexer implementation, not a fan of this style.
arjie 1 hour ago||
I do like integrating the shell with the agent. That seems like something I do occasionally need. But the occasion when I need it is getting rarer and rarer so I suspect that this is building a feature for 6 months ago.
agluszak 1 hour ago||
> a CLI coding agent that does what others can't

I've read the product description and I don't see anything that's truly unique

giancarlostoro 1 hour ago|
> think of our CLI agent as a built-in mux’er across agent sessions. This allows more natural interactions, like being able to switch directories in agent sessions, have the agent drive full-screen terminal commands (e.g. sqlite and mysql), and even run across ssh sessions with no remote binary install.

Looks like they let you use your LLM of choice on anything your terminal can SSH into using their TUI without having to install Claude Code or their agent on a remote system. Also, you are able to have multiple shell instances as you would on tmux in one session, all with the LLM fully aware of each one (not sure if its a model per session, or multiple, or what).

devmor 1 hour ago|
I like the terminal emulator but I just don't see any use for the agentic stuff.

I've disabled it all because it gets in the way.

More comments...