Posted by carlos-menezes 4 hours ago
Mowing a lawn is about creating straight even lines not optimal routes.
If somebody reports it, the city can and will come tear it out and charge me for the work.
"Ownership" is a funny thing.
Is there supposed to be more content than this?
... If JavaScript is required to view more content than this, why?
By "asked people to mow it" they're talking about the visitors to the site. It's interactive.
It's somewhat a mistake not to have "skip to results" in the actual html. On the other hand, it makes sense they want to force people to see the landing page first. And unless they want to add a whole rendered fallback the results page isn't going to be super functional without javascript.
The noscript version needs a button and a big box with an X. And even then the button would only be half-functional so I understand skipping it. It mostly just needs a "missing content" warning.