Top
Best
New

Posted by inigyou 22 hours ago

2027 memory capacity is reportedly sold out(www.ign.com)
307 points | 285 commentspage 4
znpy 17 hours ago|
Honest question: is this the first time this thing happens?

Besides the AI craze, to me it sounds kinda reasonable. Most large buyers (apple, public clouds, OEMs) do forecasting and orders in advance, right?

trynumber9 10 hours ago||
Memory prices are cyclical. But this is bigger and longer than most cycles.
inigyou 10 hours ago||
According to semiconductor industry stock market analysts, memory gets really expensive about once a decade on average so far.
gaigalas 20 hours ago||
The fact that consumer-level DDR4 is getting more expensive makes absolutely no market sense to me.
wayne-werwolf 20 hours ago||
I am guessing there is some fluidity between these markets. If consumers get priced out of the DDR5 market, the consumer DDR4 price increases as well. It is the same with cars, if the price goes up for new cars, it usually increases for used car market as well. Same with energy, price goes up for oil, all things beeing equal, other energy carries will increase to some degree.

Not sure if that's what you've meant...

gaigalas 20 hours ago||
That's it. Which is insane. We used to buy used DDR4 from obsolete servers in buckets before it was going to become e-waste. Now even that one is expensive.
AdamN 20 hours ago|||
The lines that would have made consumer-level stuff are being reduced in favor of the higher profit margin/demand products. That means more supply of those other products (but still not enough) and lower supply of the consumer-level stuff (driving up prices).
gaigalas 20 hours ago||
Isn't DDR4 like, old and obsolete? From my knowledge, you can't just take a fab that produces DDR4 and make it produce DDR5 or higher. It's kind of a leap that requires replacing a lot of stuff.

I would expect that old DDR4 machinery to end up somewhere else, still chugging along. Maybe someone buys the old production and keeps chugging low quality DDR4 or something.

To me, it sounds like that didn't happened. Fabs that were producing legacy DDR4 are still producing it, just selling it higher and surfing on the consumer price increase of DDR5. As DDR5 became more expensive, people looked to build old AM4 PCs with the older memory, and the market just raised the price so that option would also cost more. IMHO DDR4 price increase has nothing to do with production.

wao0uuno 7 hours ago|||
>Isn't DDR4 like, old and obsolete?

I built a new gaming PC with DDR4 two months ago and it's pretty great. For servers RAM speed usually matters even less.

phire 19 hours ago||||
There is some overlap. The last DDR4 fabs were typically on a 16nm process, the first DDR5 fabs were also on a 16nm process.

There shouldn't be much issue converting those 16nm DDR4 fabs to DDR5, it's really just an issue of swapping out the masks. That's assuming they haven't all already been converted years ago.

Even when there isn't an overlap, moving to the next process node usually isn't so much about replacing machines, but adding more machines. To oversimplify, you might not be able to convert one older DDR4 fab to DDR5, but sometimes you might be able to convert two older DDR4 fabs to one DDR5 fab.

Such conversions might not be the most cost-effective option in the long run (that unmodified fab could have kept selling DDR4 for years), but conversions might be significantly faster than building new fabs.

AdamN 19 hours ago||
[not an expert so I could be totally wrong] I was also just talking about the physical space. Even if the machines on the entire line have to be replaced it still probably makes sense for a company to transition in situ - displacing the old line. There's the lease for the land and building, people's commutes are structured around a certain physical location, air conditioning and electricity are already there, etc... It's not just the big expensive machines that make up the fabrication - it's also the entire structure that makes that production happen.
phire 8 hours ago||
Even if they need to replace every single lithography machine, there are a lot of other machines that probably don't need to be replaced for any given upgrade.

Like everything related to it being a clean room; All the logistics robots which move wafers around; All the machines that deposit layers of material like CVD/AVD/Sputtering; The various machines that do the actual etching; The furnaces; The inspection and quality control equipment;

Also, absolutely everything to do with dicing and packaging. But that's usually already at another factory (often a completely different company) due to how process agnostic it is. Same applies to growing and prepping the silicon wafer.

zahlman 8 hours ago||||
> Isn't DDR4 like, old and obsolete?

I'm posting this from a machine that uses DDR3 and is still perfectly capable of meeting my needs.

sophrosyne42 20 hours ago|||
Because the prices of ddr5 are causing people to use substitutes
amelius 19 hours ago||
If memory makers can fill their order books with only a single type of memory (whatever that is), then that would be preferable to them, I suppose.
kmfrk 19 hours ago||
[dead]
TZubiri 7 hours ago||
So.. memory futures? Sounds like a signal of an efficient and mature market to me, manufacturers sell their stock way beforehand, keep production steady, and wholesalers can hold stock and absorb risk in exchange of profit.

Nothing prevents wholesalers from selling their memory or memory futures at a loss, as that is a risk that is justified by equal possibiltiy of the memory appreciating in excess of inflation.

ChiperSoft 1 hour ago|
I would not make that investment. All three memory makers are currently facing a US federal lawsuit for cartel price-fixing.

https://www.polygon.com/ram-manufacturers-sued-supply-price-...

SK Hynix's suppliers are also under investigation for anti-trust behavior in South Korea.

https://en.sedaily.com/society/2026/05/29/prosecutors-raid-s...

csr86 10 hours ago||
Why AI companies wont build their own RAM but prefer to pay multiple times more than what they sold pre AI boom? (And ram business was still profitable). They already make custom processors
johntb86 10 hours ago||
AI companies aren't fabbing processors. They're buying capacity at fabs to make their own designs. To make more RAM, they'd need to invest in making more DRAM fabs, which is a slow process.
tokioyoyo 10 hours ago||
Too slow, bum and bust cycles, dependencies one layer down are also booked up.
xg15 20 hours ago|
Lame: Fight the war on general computation by spending decades pushing elaborate technical standards for locking down bootloaders, try to convince society why we need device attestation and hardware-bound keys, gradually establish devices without root access as the norm, get into constant skirmishes with free software and privacy advocates, get drawn into unpleasant political quagmires, etc etc

Game: Just buy up all the RAM...