Top
Best
New

Posted by stagas 18 hours ago

Show HN: textlog – A quiet, text-only microblogging platform, open-source, no JS(textlog.cc)
155 points | 65 comments
anupamk 5 hours ago|
This is really neat!

The main thing that stood out to me was, unlike many other micro/minimalist blogging platforms, textlog has individual notes (as opposed to blogs) as the primary unit. I feel that this choice often makes it psychologically easier for users to post something quickly without getting stuck on managing their blog’s brand and identity. Nothing wrong with the latter, but it comes with a trade-off.

And I really like the visual design: very clean and minimalistic, but also pleasant.

byson94 30 minutes ago||
That's really nice! I really like the UI of the site, its calm and soothing.
toplinesoftsys 13 hours ago||
I like this project. Simple, open-source, nice UI.
Natalia724 12 hours ago||
Agreed. A documented data export or stable feed would complement the minimal UI well: it would let a quiet service stay intentionally simple without making a user's archive feel trapped.
Barbing 11 hours ago|||
Impressed they already had a download! https://textlog.cc/account/edit

  Download your data
  Export your account, notes, connections, and activity as a JSON file.
-

btw you can write comments yourself Natalia! In fact that’ll keep ya compliant, we’re human-to-human here

stagas 11 hours ago|||
Already there[0], and also an API[1] to build things on top! And it's all open-source[2], so if we miss something we can add it.

[0]: https://textlog.cc/account/edit

[1]: https://textlog.cc/api

[2]: https://github.com/stagas/textlog

Natfan 12 hours ago|||
Claude ui
stagas 6 hours ago||
it's gpt 5.6 sol actually, credit where credit's due
liberian 6 hours ago||
[dead]
stagas 12 hours ago||
Thank you!
digitalWestie 13 hours ago||
Yes! I've always said twitter was better before images/multimedia!
chrononaut 12 hours ago||
https://web.archive.org/web/20070123220857/http://twitter.co...

For those that never had an opportunity to see it.

cgannett 12 hours ago||
Old web vibes!
Fudgel 2 hours ago||
Im having trouble getting to the site when using quad9 dns. Site works fine when using cloudflare dns though.
knlb 11 hours ago||
I recently started a section on my personal site for absolutely minimal and simple microblogging that I could Ctrl-F through: https://knlb.dev/scribbles/ -- I should probably give this a shot.
stagas 11 hours ago|
Hey, nice! If you want to try it, we have an API[0] you can pull your user feed from!

[0]: https://textlog.cc/api

anoojb 13 hours ago||
I really like this approach. I wonder if it needs such complexity for the rendering. Could you have built this as a SSG template?
stagas 13 hours ago|
Hi, thanks! There is a lot of nuance on the rendered pages, I figured server-side React was the best choice - plus it's a technology I'm comfortable with and might also encourage contributions.
anoojb 12 hours ago||
Would you be okay if I directed Claude to leverage your design and build a very simple Hugo template against it for my own personal use?
stagas 12 hours ago||
Why not, try it :)
BeetleB 13 hours ago||
Reminds me of org-social (https://github.com/tanrax/org-social)

> Notes are limited to 280 characters. The constraint keeps them quick to write and read, making room for one thought at a time.

No thanks.

stagas 13 hours ago||
Hi, I'm sorry you don't like the limitation :( this is for short thoughts you want to share, not really huge conversations, there are better places for that IMO.
BeetleB 7 hours ago|||
The character limit is, in my opinion, the primary reason Twitter became so bad. It encourages absolute language (qualifiers take up characters!) It discourages any level of nuance.

I use Mastodon which has a 500 limit, and even that sometimes is not enough.

8by3 21 minutes ago|||
The opposite of short exists.

https://tuhat.net/about

Also open source.

rowbin 5 hours ago|||
What do you mean with "became bad"? It started out with a 140 characters limit in 2006 and kept that for more than 10 years. So its the other way around: it became worse, when the character limit increased. Though I don't think its due to the character limit either way.
BeetleB 4 hours ago||
It was bad long before they increased the character limit.

Saying shitty/toxic stuff can be done concisely. Giving a nuanced response is simply not possible. So people respond with jokes/sarcasm/counter toxic stuff. And the cycle continues.

childintime 10 hours ago|||
well, you may consider rewarding known quality users with an extended limit, say double. the others can pay ;)
Gooblebrai 9 hours ago|||
That's how enshittification begins. Next thing you know and there are blue badges next to profiles.
stagas 9 hours ago||
lol Yes enshittification is the thing I want to avoid, so hard decisions need to be made that will not make everybody happy. Still, this is open-source[0], so we can open a discussion (ideally alongside a PR) and evolve it.

[0]: https://github.com/stagas/textlog

stagas 9 hours ago|||
haha, yeah good idea. Also customize the theme as others wanted. So many opportunities here. :P
andros 9 hours ago||
[flagged]
sentinel1909 4 hours ago||
Signed up, will use it. Having trouble seeing how long this will actually exist though, because people are miserable and it WILL be ruined.
supermatt 12 hours ago|
The 280 char limit seems arbitrary, given you cant even keep the about page within that limit: https://textlog.cc/about

If you are going to limit it to short posts, maybe the length of a short post is the length to limit it to, rather than emulating the 2xSMS of every twitter clone?

Other than that, it looks really clean and neat - I just dont think being 280 chars adds anything other than resulting in people posting with pagination as per X 1/3.

helterskelter 11 hours ago||
I like the idea of a shorter character limit as it nudges users to a specific mode of interaction: short thoughts/updates and not long-winded soliloquies. It's signalling that interaction with this platform doesn't demand much of your time or attention. I don't know what the about page has to do with it, but you have to draw the line somewhere.

That said, I'm not a social media user besides HN I guess.

supermatt 9 hours ago||
For perspective: you just commented 404 chars. Your first paragraph alone was 346.

My comment on the about page was that it needed more than 280 chars to communicate what the app is about - even the title + intro exceeds the limit.

If it is truly believed that 280 chars is enough to communicate an idea, then the about page should follow that philosophy.

stagas 9 hours ago||
I'm considering raising to 500. Care enough to open an issue[0] so that maybe there is a discussion we can track?

[0]: https://github.com/stagas/textlog/issues

supermatt 9 hours ago|||
Honestly, I don't really care that much. The project looks like fun, and I wish you the best with it, but I don't really post on microblogging platforms myself.

I just wanted to give a bit of feedback as someone who reads them - and point out that on almost every twitter/bluesky submission to HN they are using ways to work around the 280/300 char limitations.

To play devils advocate - 500 also seems a bit arbitrary ;) If I were making a platform like this myself, I would go for a power of 2 that makes sense for storage/buffering. Maybe 1KiB including all meta, etc. You could comfortably fit a post the size of your about page, and all associated meta in that - even when serialised as JSON or something. I'd go from there and work backwards to come up with a size that has a real technical purpose.

krapp 6 hours ago|||
Make it a setting and let people decide for themselves.
stagas 12 hours ago|||
It needs to be short - there is already a limit that worked well - why bikeshed it more?
supermatt 12 hours ago|||
A limit that worked well for who?

Almost every twitter/x post submitted to HN has people labelling their posts as "X of Y" threads, using images as text, or using pro account posts.

You can see it yourself: https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=twitter.com Ive just looked at 30 and each of them exceed 280 chars by far.

Retr0id 12 hours ago||
It works well for microbloggers.
supermatt 12 hours ago||
But clearly not the microbloggers on twitter/x, Bluesky, etc, who use the patterns I mentioned.
Retr0id 10 hours ago||
Those are definitionally not microbloggers. It's ok for a platform explicitly for microblogging to not cater to their macroblogging desires.
supermatt 8 hours ago||
Definitionally not?

"Microblogs, for example on Twitter..." https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/microblo...

"Some popular social networks such as X (formerly Twitter), Threads, Tumblr, Mastodon, and Bluesky can be viewed as collections of microblogs." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microblogging

CitrusFruits 12 hours ago|||
I think this is the opposite of bikeshedding, it's literally a core feature and constraint.
indigodaddy 10 hours ago||
You could fork and do whatever no?
supermatt 9 hours ago||
Sure, but I don't care that much. It is a Show HN, so I was giving feedback.
More comments...