Top
Best
New

Posted by gorbachev 15 hours ago

Zohran Mamdani's NYC Tech Team Is What DOGE Should Have Been(www.wired.com)
69 points | 30 comments
frogperson 15 hours ago|
You mean they are making useful software and not just eliminating people and groups that were investigating Elon in some way?
jprd 15 hours ago||
https://archive.is/PSE0i
bl4kers 3 hours ago|
That's not a trusted source anymore: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/02/wikipedia-bans-a...
speak_plainly 14 hours ago||
The college scorecard Lisa Gelobter lead is really useful:

https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/search/

Kinrany 15 hours ago||
You mean the thing that was wrong with DOGE was execution, not the idea itself
nicoburns 15 hours ago||
Of course everybody wants the government to be efficient. People just have very different idea of what that means in practice (what is useful vs. wasteful spending is highly subjective (in many cases))
xboxnolifes 11 hours ago|||
Which idea? The marketing, or the goal? Because nothing about DOGE was an idea about making the government "efficient". It was about weakening the government.
Daishiman 15 hours ago|||
Ideas are a cover for the execution as it's the results that matter. Whoever is against government waste?
camillomiller 15 hours ago||
This is a disingenuous comment, possibly involuntarily so, but it assumes that the parties involve ever had any other goal than just killing what Elon deemed useless. One of the darkest pages in American history.
cultofmetatron 15 hours ago||
you can't beat the Zorhan!
vadepaysa 15 hours ago||
so much politics on HN these days. edit: I mean politics related content
ohlookit 14 hours ago||
[dead]
aliasxneo 15 hours ago||
[flagged]
bigyabai 15 hours ago|||
> You're unlikely to find any seriously critical views here.

You're welcome to criticize him yourself, if you want. I suspect that your complaints will be pretty weak relative to the broader American political zeitgeist.

aliasxneo 15 hours ago||
I've had plenty of political conversations on HN before. I've literally been on the platform for almost a decade. It's always been bent one way - which makes political dialogue a pointless endeavor.
bigyabai 14 hours ago||
Kinda sounds like a cop-out. You alleged that he's due criticism, but you're unable to levy it?
aliasxneo 14 hours ago||
No, you're trying to egg me into a political conversation on HN, and I'm refusing. I thought that was pretty clear in the last comment.
bigyabai 14 hours ago|||
I want you to substantiate your original political claim, not lament your loneliness for having an unpopular opinion.
hagbard_c 9 hours ago||
Nope, you're doing exactly what the parent poster said, feeling secure in the 'support' you expect to get from many others on this site. The 'no politics' rule has always been a bit hazy but for about a decade it seems to have been forgotten as long as the 'politics' falls within the desired narrative. As W.O.P.R. said it is a strange game which can only be won by not playing.
qwerpy 14 hours ago|||
I agree with you about this. If you go against the prevailing politics here, you'll get "source?"-d and nitpicked to death by an army of fact checkers while they can state opinions as facts with impunity. If your facts are unassailable you simply get downvoted and ignored.

The best thing to do is to flag political posts and comments to bury them. Happily, this appears to have happened here.

aliasxneo 13 hours ago||
Glad I'm not crazy. This is exactly the behavior I've witnessed over the years.
boredpeter 15 hours ago|||
[dead]
erulabs 14 hours ago||
Two arguments that have so far, been talking completely past each other with no desire to understand each other:

1) efficiency means "use software to identify and cut federal programs that could reasonably be taken over by either the State dept, States themselves, or the market"

2) efficiency means "add new software and programs that streamline existing processes"

As usual, we should be doing both in a careful and considered way, and definitely should not be accusing the other side of either fascism or communism. "Efficiency" is not a decision on funding or not funding federal science research, and everyone using that word to mean that is being knowingly disingenuous.

There was a huge amount of bloat in USAID, and I'm sure there will be a huge amount of bloat in NYC, and I'm sure there was a lot of good in both. Unless you're willing to discuss specifics and tradeoffs with a calm head, you're not helping just by virtue of being upset.

woah 15 hours ago||
I heard they invented the GIF
SirFatty 15 hours ago|
I'm just glad I don't live in New York.