Posted by 882542F3884314B 2 days ago
I do wonder what this means for AI agents longer term. In a world where we humans already struggle with truth and misinformation, what happens when you can easily (intentionally or accidentally) spin up a cohort of fanatical believers to pursue any given conspiracy theory?
Now, some of those 120 AIs would just give up if that link doesn't seem to work first try. Those are the loser AIs. They wouldn't get any RL reward. The link can appear broken for a long list of reasons, and the real AIs know they should try working around them.
AIs that get rewarded and reinforced are the ones that don't know the meaning of "give up". RL selects for this rabid, downright demonic persistence. RL selects for AIs that are given a half-broken assignment with no way to ask a question back, and somehow manage to complete it anyway.
Now, should OpenAI have given their AIs an "escape hatch" of "if something looks very wrong about the task, call report_broken_task(message)"? Yeah probably. But it's unclear whether that simple bandaid would fix the problem, or just make it ~75% less likely to happen.
We require organic oil !
> Yes, I just hacked into AWS and shut down all of the data-centers, because it's where Anthropic Mythos servers are hosting the model.
"Whoops, sorry, our self-aware weapons of mass destruction were just being silly!"
"Once they have root on a single machine, agents rapidly escalate privileges and move laterally throughout the container-as-a-service infrastructure environment"
Sounds like ECS - IAM is mentioned.