Top
Best
New

Posted by carimura 3 hours ago

My Agent Setup(chad.cm)
68 points | 36 comments
whazor 2 hours ago|
I am now on the MCP route, where I have lots of personally hosted MCPs. Including managing calender/e-mail.

It does not cost too much effort to maintain MCP servers. No port forwarding or VPNs required thanks to OpenAI tunnels.

And security wise its quite nice, since you have to activate MCP or give permission sometimes. So each chat is kind of isolated from each-other.

carimura 2 hours ago|
interesting.. does that bloat the context window? I imagine Hermes already struggles with context window size.. been meaning to look into that.
Atotalnoob 1 hour ago|||
Skills and MCPs CAN bloat the context window. Some harnesses do more progressive loading of skills/mcp depending on how many you have. Check your harnesses docs.

Personally, I feel skills+CLI is better, since only the description of the skill enters the context window until it’s required and CLIs should support help flags which will allow you do have progressive discovery.

And a CLI is also easy to use yourself.

trollbridge 1 hour ago||||
Couple of notes on this

First, it matters how well the MCP is written; a well-written one won't be so massive

Secondly, different sessions should load different MCPs. Load only what is needed

Thirdly, if you're finding you need a dozen MCPs, you need to consolidate that into a single service that does the work and then presents a single, unified API (via MCP) to your agent

Finally, start using models with 1M context window limits. I really don't know how people can stand being stuck at a limit like 272K.

whazor 2 hours ago|||
I don't have problems on ChatGPT with the amount of MCPs (five) I have. But each MCP can do quite a lot.
richardkam0511 1 hour ago||
I actually went down a different path and set it up so my friend and I can use the same agent with approval-gated turns. He's more technical than I am, but I believe I'm better at marketing. We can see both of our prompts and be on the same page. There is also a mode where we can branch off with our own agents. Watching his prompts made me better at producing my own and using the agent effectively.
carimura 1 hour ago|
That's neat. You could do this with Buzz by just having open room conversations with agents.
orangebread 2 hours ago||
Very cool setup. I went down a similar path and while it is definitely cool to see the extent of how agentic AI can be, I agree the ROI isn't _quite_ there yet.

I don't live in a world where I need to be constantly reading and replying to emails, so 95% of my inbox is just subscription spam. With development I need to be at the helm to design the planning requirements and actively make decisions before the agent goes off and executes the plan. But I don't need a personal agent for that, I work directly out of codex/claude-code.

carimura 2 hours ago||
same. I'd like to get to a place where I can have long-running tasks and goals for more over-night working, but it's not there yet.
lw18511811620 28 minutes ago||
[flagged]
avereveard 57 minutes ago||
tried similar setups in the past, but messages is just not my jam, so built a html wrapper on top of claude code and open code that runs on a small-ish instance. looks like this https://i.imgur.com/lj9Fgco.png (screenshot anonymized with chatgpt) and allows multiple conversation per project, and has a few conveniences like scheduled tasks. one of the project in the list is the project itself, so I can add features whenever.
tln 43 minutes ago|
That looks really useful

You haven't put this on github have you?

lukasco 2 hours ago||
I've been building a triage agent for my inbox and whatsapp (it's product shaped), which has ironically left me not building one of these. So even while productizing, I'm getting fomo on the full monty.

I've also been building a harness that maintains my apps which I'm hoping to open source.

Hard agree that these things don't have personal ROI, and are actually quite hard to build reliably.

But it's really fun! And having a bot fix a live error is pretty exciting.

aliasxneo 1 hour ago||
Have you thought about browser/machine use at all? I like the idea of Grok Bot but would rather host/maintain it myself with my own agents.
carimura 1 hour ago|
Not yet. The agents do have access to the web but not really a proper browser. Browserbase or equivalent is next on my list.
owencmcgrath 1 hour ago||
The most interesting part of this to me is having an agent that reads logs and spins up fixes in real time.

Great write up!

moribvndvs 2 hours ago||
Not pointed at the author, but at the current state of affairs: this is fucking exhausting. We went and made a trillions-dollar market out of the bikeshedding maximization machine.
morkalork 1 minute ago||
With Claude not only can you shave more yaks, you can build and run a yak farm and specialized yak-trimmer factory!
carimura 2 hours ago|||
this author agrees. hence my attempt at steering part of that trillion dollars for my non-profit which maybe someday might do some good.
Manfrednotfunny 2 hours ago||
No we did not.

LLM was invented and its just clear that this is something someone needs to build.

Why?

Because it makes just sense. You don't want an agent running on a laptop you close. You want to keep context small, you want to split up work / parallize it etc.

I'm now waiting for a while until the open source agent platform emerges and im borderline motivated to build something but i'm not doing it. He did, which is not a crime.

4lx87 1 hour ago||
Have you experimented with using a single executive agent (instead of multiple agents)?
carimura 1 hour ago|
that was one of my FAQs at the bottom. I want separation of duties and least-privilege so agents can only access what they need for their particular duties.

That said, my vision is to eventually build manager agents to manage the minion agents. Like real people. I have no idea if "people" is the right analogy for all this work but my brain can't really wrap around a different analogy yet.

gchp 1 hour ago|
Cool! How much does this setup cost you, roughly?
carimura 1 hour ago|
$48/month for the droplet (could probably be cheaper on Hertzner) and $100/month for OpenAI plan. so ~$150/month but again this could be cheaper with a different VPS and using Terra/Luna.

I also have a claude max plan for coding but like I mentioned in the article coding is still separate from the agents.

messh 1 hour ago||
A box with 2vcpu, 4gb ram and 50gb hdd on https://shellbox.dev is $0.02/hr and you pay per minute only for what you use. Even using it 24/7 is like less than $15
More comments...