Top
Best
New

Posted by neogodless 20 hours ago

An update on leaving Gmail for Fastmail(moddedbear.com)
272 points | 170 commentspage 4
egorfine 4 hours ago|
I'm using Fastmail for about 15 years and this is one of the services I'm extremely happy with. Definitely recommend!
NoboruWataya 13 hours ago||
I have been very happy with mailbox.org. I recently signed up for early access to Thundermail, which is the new email service being rolled out by the Thunderbird team. I have no particular need to change except that I like the idea of supporting Thunderbird. So I will be keeping an eye on it.

If you use a custom domain and email clients rather than webmail, moving around becomes a lot easier. Another tip is to use a service like addy.io where you can create a new alias for every service, to help protect against spam.

sabot90260 4 hours ago||
Subdomain addressing for auto-sorting is clever. Beats writing filter rules one by one.
IndySun 15 hours ago||
FastMail has an admirable bug bounty.

Have its privacy claims ever been independently audited?

https://www.fastmail.com/bug-bounty/

ivankra 8 hours ago|
I stopped reading their privacy policy at "Fastmail is an Australian company" - Australia is a five eyes jurisdiction. That said, I'm a happy customer of almost a decade with them, but my email correspondence is pretty boring and not politically sensitive.
IndySun 3 hours ago||
Interesting. Should any email provider based in any of the 5 Eyes (or even 14) be avoided? But I feel, particularly for everyday folk, we have reached the point at which avoiding some level of surveillance is now virtually impossible.
zazuke 8 hours ago||
Only thing missing is a Screener, which once you have it, you cant live without. No need for burner adresses, as nobod lands in your inbox unapproves. I added it to my TUI, nvim and markdown first email client, neomd.
bix6 16 hours ago||
Anyone have thoughts on proton vs fastmail?
nsagent 16 hours ago||
I'm in the process of leaving Proton and moving to Fastmail. I'm now paying for Mullvad and Fastmail, but haven't had a chance to port over a bunch of Simplelogin aliases I have over to Fastmail yet (my fault for not using a custom domain for those, which I've now rectified with Fastmail).

Despite having Proton since 2018, I've really gotten fed up with their service quality — they seem to half-ass most of their services and it's a real pita to use their ecosystem. People have been complaining for ages and nothing changes, so I've decided to take my business elsewhere.

Hopefully I don't get flamed for my decision; that's another annoying aspect about Proton. There's a vocal portion of the userbase that are zealots and really take you to task when they feel you are criticizing Proton in any way.

bix6 16 hours ago||
I’ve liked their VPN so I’m considering my email there but people seem to have a really strong preference for fast mail so I’m curious why.

Are you leaving just because general annoyance or improved feature set or what? It’s a lot of work to migrate so I don’t want to be back here in 2 years swapping again.

nsagent 55 minutes ago||
I moved because I found the Proton service to be poor. That includes reaching out to support for issues with my email and not really getting a good resolution.

What's worse is that I ported all my emails over to Proton, which meant my data usage was above the free tier, so I was essentially hostage to keep paying (even though my actual usage is on Proton is much below the free tier). While they do label the emails you import, it's useless because it gets intermingled if they are part of the same thread (for example, all my bills that switched over were tagged as imported even when I got a new bill; this was an issue for even direct email threads with other people). Furthermore, it's nearly impossible to bulk delete anything, you have to use their web interface (which is very limiting). If you try to delete using something like Thunderbird, the emails stay in All Mail, so it's not really deleted (thus keeps using your disk space, preventing you from moving to the free tier). It took me nearly a week to devise a way to properly delete the imported emails without accidentally deleting real emails. Using the web interface is SLOW. It was painful doing the deletes that way because Proton struggled to keep up with the deletes, it was glitching like crazy.

Needless to say, that was a shitty shitty experience, and I'm positive that's part of their approach to lock users into their platform.

plqbfbv 2 hours ago|||
I also examined Tuta (in addition to Proton) as replacement for Gmail, and as others have said for Proton, the big no for me was having to deal with other software components to have IMAP or other access options.

I have integrations e.g. for scripts, external mailers and so on, so I don't want to pay something AND still have to setup something myself and maintain it. Fastmail has the concept of app passwords, which are username+password combos that you can scope to specific services (e.g. only sending emails, only accessing calendar, ...), which is perfect for my needs.

thisislife2 16 hours ago|||
Nowhere near the same - there's no JMAP or true IMAP on Proton.
bix6 15 hours ago||
Interesting thank you! I don’t know much about JMAP but sounds trick.
rationalist 15 hours ago|||
Running a relatively-small opt-in email list, I've had problems with deliverability to Proton.
bix6 15 hours ago||
Do you know if it’s @proton domains specifically? Eg are custom domains similarly affected?
rationalist 14 hours ago||
I only received complaints from people with @proton addresses. Very few people use non-free email addresses.
bigstrat2003 13 hours ago|||
I haven't used fastmail, but proton works well for me. It's mildly annoying to have to run a local IMAP proxy to use a proper email client for my mail, but it's not a dealbreaker. And with the US having had over a decade track record of violating everyone's digital privacy, I enjoy the fact that proton isn't a US company and is therefore less susceptible to that pressure.
tamimio 15 hours ago|||
I have proton email since they had the .ch domain and two passwords to open your inbox, never used it for anything serious. Fastmail works well because you should never think of emails as private or anonymous, the protocol itself wasn’t designed with that in mind, I won’t even mind to have my whole email publicly shared like a blog because I never used it for anything private.
bix6 15 hours ago||
How come you use both instead of just migrating fully to fastmail?
spencerflem 16 hours ago||
I tried both and found Fastmail vastly easier to use.

The encryption part wasn’t that valuable for me and ofc Proton doesn’t encrypt the metadata and unless they’re proton too it’s not E2E so I’m happy sticking with Signal for that sorta stuff and leaving email for talking to businesses.

armadyl 12 hours ago|||
> Proton doesn’t encrypt the metadata and unless they’re proton too it’s not E2E

To be fair though your emails are E2EE at rest in your inbox, so in the event of seizure or a subpoena they can’t hand over anything usable aside from metadata unlike fastmail who will hand everything over.

bix6 15 hours ago|||
UI/UX is definitely paramount for me, appreciate the note!
Scene_Cast2 14 hours ago||
I made the move some time ago. There are some unpolished parts here and there, but I'm glad I made the move.

Somewhat unrelated criticism of Gmail - during the migration, I found out that there is no way to search for starred archived emails in Gmail. They don't show up in Starred, nor in any search with is:starred. Their star status also doesn't carry over when migrating.

mindwok 14 hours ago||
I did this for my business' email about a year ago. A few weeks ago, I moved everything. Fastmail is awesome, but perhaps more important is how bad Gmail's web interface is. Fastmail is way more responsive and fluid and feels almost native.
paulbgd 10 hours ago|
One underrated thing is how easy it is to get credentials for sending emails. If you self host a lot of stuff it's quick to get going.
More comments...