Top
Best
New

Posted by Topfi 17 hours ago

GPT-5.6 Sol Pricing Cut by 50%(openrouter.ai)
536 points | 354 commentspage 5
Topology1 10 hours ago|
How can they do this? Are they subsidizing it out of pocket?
ben8bit 8 hours ago||
Terra is also a fantastic model.
shevy-java 8 hours ago||
They are really getting desperate. The bubble is coming closer to an end here.
gutterscale 7 hours ago||
GPT-5.6 sol starting to be a real workhorse at this price point
kristo 5 hours ago||
It shocks me how little people seem to care that they are supporting an evil Zionist lizard man who molested his sister and is happy supporting trump. Doesn’t even come up in the conversation here. I don’t really care if sol is a bit better, I still make decisions on more than that.

Is the HN community just too online and sucked in to the musk mind manipulation vortex? Or what is going on? Why does nobody seem to care?

vorpalhex 14 hours ago||
Do other people find 5.6 to be worse at most simple tasks and frequently over complicate things?

I asked it to write a user todo and it turned out a four page essay. I gave the same task to 5.4 and got the small list of checkboxes I expected.

qup 13 hours ago||
I've found it to be great for planning code changes (or new projects). I use the superpowers plug-in which I think guides the planning.

Then I switch models (to luna) before implementation. I find this combo nearly always does what I want.

I also use a skill called ponytail, its goal is to keep things terse and edits small. It may have contributed to the successes above.

I like that skills are easy to try out, too.

jeremyjh 10 hours ago|||
I stopped using superpowers because it wanted to turn every tiny bug fix into a $37MM DOD project. I got effective results but it took ages. I may try again - I need to find a good way to run different profiles in my harness so I can easily shut it off. The default planning workflow in OMP is pretty good though.

I agree Luna is great for task execution, either as a sub-agent with Sol planning and coordinating or if the task is well defined and straightforward, but there are lots of models now that you can say that about.

jcastro 11 hours ago|||
I have the same setup you have, love it!
drdexebtjl 12 hours ago|||
You would probably get better results with Luna for the real simple tasks, or Sol with low thinking effort.

I find that I get exactly the effort that I asked for, which is pretty nice. The other side of that coin is that these are the least lazy models I’ve used so far. They will go on elaborate tangents to complete the task when I want them to.

khacvy 9 hours ago||
any good best practice for effort selection on claude. I always use high as default.
drdexebtjl 11 minutes ago||
Opus 4.8 on Low is similar in price and quality to Sonnet 5 on High, but much faster.

But otherwise I don’t use Claude anymore.

infinite_spin 12 hours ago|||
I've found it's worse for simple tasks too, and I have to give it stricter guidelines, and sometimes it doesn't follow the same patterns I've grown to expect. I've found using 5.6 (sol) is good for diagnosing issues though, especially in terms of optimization of some given path
dimgl 13 hours ago|||
Yep. I have not yet had a single good experience with Sol or the 5.6 models on a variety of harnesses and configurations. It overthinks, overcomplicates and often makes my code into an unmaintainable sludge. It'll usually take 5+ turns of steering to get it in the right direction.
OutOfHere 14 hours ago||
It's your responsibility to set an appropriate level of Thinking. For simple tasks, I use the instant model. As an approximation, the choice is proportional to the amount of time I want it spending on the task. Also, you can always ask it to respond succinctly.
code_biologist 13 hours ago||
[dead]
aetherspawn 7 hours ago||
Can we get it for the reduced rate direct from OpenAI though?
gxs 10 hours ago||
Absolutely not

I’ve used Claude exclusively for the past few months

Was excited when Sol came out a few weeks ago and loaded it up

I made the mistake of treating it as if it were Claude - I’d assumed they were close enough in ability and treated them that way

Well, turns out my instruction sets for Claude are 100% too complicated for Sol

Sol made the stupidest assumptions, constantly did things that it wasn’t asked to do and always approached code in what I considered a weird way - I had redo a lot of my prompts to get it anywhere close

Now, did it do good work?

Yes, on occasion. But with LLMs and coding, consistency is the name of the game. Constantly having to correct the LLM and constantly feeling paranoid that it won’t listen makes for an exhausting session

Maybe if you “came up” in the codex world you’re more fluent with it, but sticking with Claude for now

iammrpayments 9 hours ago||
Why are you being downvoted, is this post an ad or something.
cbg0 8 hours ago||
Probably because it's PEBCAK.
gxs 7 hours ago||
Hard to take offense from someone who uses pebkac seriously

Kudos to you though for being your authentic self so publicly

dana321 5 hours ago||
"rewrite unreal engine in rust, make no mistakes"
xcupapps 1 hour ago||
[dead]
chinagenie_ai 3 hours ago|
[flagged]
More comments...