Top
Best
New

Posted by gavide 13 hours ago

How Bluesky draws its logo on screenshots(timmarinin.net)
544 points | 358 commentspage 2
godelski 11 hours ago|
I'm confused why people are mad at Bluesky for this. Everyone stating their issues seems more related to Apple than Bluesky. So why point the finger at them?
serial_dev 9 hours ago||
I don’t think a significant percent of real Bluesky users actually care.

Having a follow button on the screenshot brings nothing and a logo is helpful when sharing (“hey it’s not twitter, I know it looks like it but it’s bluesky”) and looks subtle.

It’s just it’s a forum so people say things for discussions sake and get outraged by anything that a platform they don’t like is doing.

whitenoise7 8 hours ago||
> a significant percent of Bluesky users

42 of their 56 active users might not care about a watermark but god dammit do they respect it

And so should you

saagarjha 8 hours ago|||
Bluesky didn't have to use this API for this purpose.
godelski 5 hours ago||
Okay? Is the purpose bad? Leading to bad things? What's the problem
KeybordWarrior6 10 hours ago||
[flagged]
p0w3n3d 5 hours ago||
First - it's great that people can't take screenshots of their sensitive data by accident

Second - I hate when my device keeps me from anything. I'm used to have control over my computer, and this is outrageous that I can't take screenshots of anything I want. There should be a god mode or something like that.

wmichelin 9 hours ago||
I know of social media sites who have kept an untracked version of the link in the dom of the A tag, but replace it with their in-house link tracker copy of it as you're clicking, that way the destination looks correct when you hover over the link.
tgv 6 hours ago||
A simple call to get a list of sensitive screen areas would suffice. Add a bunch of options to make everybody happy, but don't allow replacement with different content.
thomasnowhere 1 hour ago||
[dead]
asdfsa32 10 hours ago||
This is an interesting case of "Good use" of a "bad feature". This feature is bad because it works against the user and device owner, but this use case like hiding your password when sharing your screen is a good use case.
shepherdjerred 8 hours ago||
This is a pretty cool, harmless hack honestly. I don’t see how you could be mad at it.
expedited123 5 hours ago|
It feels restrictive, especially since it’s part of a broader pattern of limiting user freedom on platforms. For instance, on PC you can't simply right click on a video and save it on bluesky. They add some frontend bullshit to prevent you from doing that. On "new" Reddit I remember when you saved an image it would always have a watermark on it. On PC, you can't preview the raw image/video either. On Instagram you can't save images at all easily. Cant view content without being logged in, etc.. Now contrast this with platforms like Mastodon where I can do whatever I want with the uploaded media there and there are barely any such restrictions.
0xferruccio 13 hours ago||
To be fair this is useful for discovering bluesky from screenshots getting posted on other platforms.

Their product UI kind of looks like X, so it's helpful to know the source of a post

grim_io 13 hours ago||
I don't think anyone doubts that it benefits the company.
mulmen 13 hours ago||
If only there was some uniform way to identify a resource. But it might lead people out of the walled garden so best not to risk it.
pastel8739 10 hours ago||
Or, in the case of X, into the outside of the wall of the garden with no way through
bouncycastle 5 hours ago||
Dear app developers: please do not detect screenshots, and do not change behavior. It is my phone and I should have the right to save anything on my screen for my own purposes and you should not know that I do that.
wraptile 5 hours ago|
This complaint should be aimed at operating system developers who should have never allow such infringement to begin with.
TeMPOraL 4 hours ago||
Reading between the lines:

Oh, so you can take screenshots of the content that tries to avoid it if you do it mid-switch?

If it's reliable and WONTFIX, that's almost enough to get me to switch away from Android.

Screenshot taking prevention is harmful and should not have ever been allowed to become a platform-level feature in the first place. Because if there's one rule of platform/client interaction, is that if you add a feature that can be abused against customers for stupid reasons, it will be. There's a number of apps I have on my Android phone that block screenshots for dubious reasons, that can be maaaybe charitably explained by calling them "growth hacking pretending to be a security feature", but in some cases even that's a stretch.

This feature should never have existed in the first place.

(At least Bluesky is open about it, both by being Open Source and calling out the "growth hack" by name in source code.)

zzo38computer 12 hours ago||
If the feature can sometimes be useful (including this situation, which some other comments mentioned; but also for other things such as hiding actual secure data), then perhaps it should be made as a setting which can be changed in the setting menu (e.g. "Exclude secure data from screenshots"; it should also mention which apps use this feature), so prevent abuse. (This would also make it clear what the feature is, as well as being able to disable it.)
akersten 12 hours ago|
That such a setting does not exist suggests the feature's true purpose is not for the end user's own benefit!
motbus3 5 hours ago|
Unfortunately way more applications inject some sort of info into the image using noise of alpha channels when you take a screenshot... Ofc you shouldn't be doing anything wrong, but let's say you join a court and provide some evidence in confidence, you can be found if that evidence is shared with both lawyers
More comments...