Top
Best
New

Posted by floathub 12 hours ago

Felony charges for citizen deleting phone data at US Border(www.nytimes.com)
https://archive.ph/SflVC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2rokxux5cU

476 points | 642 commentspage 5
righthand 3 hours ago|
What about everyone does this at the border. Then what is normalized is deleting your encryption key while entering, they won’t prosecute everyone on their baseless prosecutions. Join in I say, there is no law being broken only scare tactics being applied to prevent this kind of thing. Normalize the act not the consequences.
yapyap 2 hours ago||
yikes
0xbadcafebee 5 hours ago||
So we're presumed guilty until proven otherwise (the presumption is, any data we delete must be illegal; couldn't possibly be nude selfies that the government has no right to see)
quickthrowman 11 hours ago||
Would it be permissible to wipe your phone before going through customs to get back into the US? If they ask to search your already wiped phone, you aren’t destroying any evidence.
dredmorbius 9 hours ago||
There are apparently problems with wipe/restore under GrapheneOS:

<https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49060780>

(From the HN GrapheneOS account about a month ago.)

grapheneos 2 hours ago|||
It has an encrypted backup/restore system.

We were talking about an attacker taking an image of the SSD prior to it being wiped not helping them because information needed to derive the key encryption keys is gone from the secure element. It similarly doesn't help them to do a brute force on a server farm since they're rate limited by the secure element. It only allows 20 attempts and has rapidly increasing delays between those. There's also hardware bound key derivation but that only helps improve the strength of a decent password. The secure element rate limiting makes even a random 6 digit PIN highly insecure unless an attacker can exploit the secure element.

dredmorbius 2 hours ago||
Thank you!

(Very much appreciate your active participation here.)

TheqO 4 hours ago||||
That link says you can't take a image of the disk prior to wiping.

OP is talking about just backing up what you need off-phone and then wiping it.

HybridStatAnim8 5 hours ago|||
What problems are you referring to?
dredmorbius 2 hours ago||
<https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49394193>
OutOfHere 10 hours ago||
Yes. Of course it is permissible. It is your device. The wipe must have completed before arriving at the counter.
laughing_man 5 hours ago||
I wouldn't assume that to be the case. It's illegal under federal law to destroy evidence of a crime. Just what the government needs to do to show that you've destroyed evidence of a crime and not just the sexting you did with your girlfriend is a pretty murky area of law, from what I can tell.

I would not present a phone to customs that had clearly just been wiped.

OutOfHere 3 hours ago||
You're speaking nonsense since there was no charge or warrant against him. There was no crime that was committed. People are free to use their phone for f sake. People who reason as poorly as you will lead to all remaining rights being lost.
grapheneos 2 hours ago|||
The way he wiped it is legal for the same reason. It was an illegal search and he was under no obligation to preserve the data on his phone.

It's legal to refuse to provide a PIN/password in the US. He's a US citizen so they couldn't refuse him entry. If he wasn't then the result would be getting deported.

It likely would have been a much better decision to refuse to provide the PIN/password and rely on the encryption and device security instead. He could have done a reboot or shutdown in advance but even without that it would have done it automatically via the locked device auto-reboot timer. The secure element only allows 20 attempts for key derivation with rapidly growing delays between those. If he had a strong passphrase then even a secure element exploit wouldn't obtain the data protected by it.

laughing_man 3 hours ago|||
Ah, I see where you've gone wrong. You're expecting to apply common sense and reason to the law.

That kind of thinking has landed a whole lot of people in prison.

OutOfHere 1 hour ago||
You're losing track of the discussion which was about erasing data before arriving at the counter. In any event, if you're so willing to "bend over" to the man, please try not to take others down with you.
GiorgioG 2 hours ago||
Anyone that is surprised by this or somehow thinks this is new clearly hasn't crossed the border a whole lot. I grew up in a city along the US/Canada border. You don't fuck around with US Customs (or Canadian) agents. My cousin (not always so friendly) pissed off a US Customs agent (in the 90s mind you) and they promptly took his car and disassembled much of it looking for non-existent drugs. When they put it back together it was never the same. Their job is to be suspicious, 99.999% of the time people are completely innocent. But let 1 bad person through and it's Customs' fault for whatever bad thing they do. Not an easy job. Not an excuse for how they can misbehave either.

Is it right? It makes no difference, Customs can make your life miserable, that's just the reality of it, always has been and it can't have gotten better in recent times.

pjc50 11 hours ago||
Paywalled, but what is the actual charge? Is it some extremely generic "obstructing an investigation" one? The US is quite good about making court documents available on line, if someone can find it.
hoppyhoppy2 11 hours ago||
The article says he was charged with obstruction.

You can try this "gift link" to the article: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/21/us/politics/samuel-tunick...

floathub 11 hours ago|||
He is charged with obstruction, but under domestic terrorism (as defined by a national security presidential memorandum).
superxpro12 5 hours ago||
But republicans assured me that they wouldn't ever start throwing around domestic terrorism at democrats!
OutOfHere 10 hours ago||||
The gift link shows only a fraction of the article text. Just stick to https://archive.is/SflVC.
hamper653 11 hours ago|||
Obstruction to what though?
c0l0 11 hours ago|||
Injustice ;)
stymaar 11 hours ago|||
Illegitimate abuse of border control power to restrict freedom of speech.
jeroenhd 11 hours ago|||
Knowingly providing a PIN that would erase evidence is going to get tough in court.

But the man was also hated by the cops because of his activism. They were going to catch him for something, some day. This incident just provided the necessary excuse to lock him up.

myrmidon 11 hours ago|||
There is no duty to keep a copy of messages and private data on your phone for the FBI to peruse at its leisure. Quite the opposite, actually (according to the constitution).

It is pretty clear to me that law enforcement conspired to abuse a border crossing to effect basically an unconstitutional search ("fishing expedition"), which it would never have gotten a warrant for.

This is them being spiteful after that whole thing failed. Note how law enforcement basically admits this on the record. The whole thing is a disgrace; every decisionmaker involved in this should be sacked immediately.

hamper653 11 hours ago||||
Evidence of what?
JungleGymSam 5 hours ago|||
[dead]
jeroenhd 11 hours ago|||
Whatever they claimed they needed access for his phone to. Probably nothing serious that would be worth more than a fine, if anything. But now they've got him for deleting evidence, which is pretty bad.
59nadir 5 hours ago|||
There is no "evidence"; by any reasonable interpretation of that word there would have to be an actual accusation of crime for there to be evidence of one. This was a search predicated on literally no actual basis apart from "we have the right to search your device because we have ultimate power at border passings", essentially just a fishing expedition.

This also doesn't even get to the more important point: If you don't have the contents of the phone you have literally no evidence of a crime being committed, other than the one they invented post-facto: "Deleting data that could hypothetically be incriminating, not in any specific way but just generally, maybe".

hamper653 10 hours ago|||
> if anything

That’s the crux of the matter, isn’t it? If there was no suspicion whatsoever, hence no investigation, then he couldn’t possibly obstruct it.

gonzalohm 11 hours ago||||
How can they prove that? What if it was a glitch?
jeroenhd 11 hours ago|||
That shouldn't be too hard. Get someone from Google or someone with any tech knowledge to explain to the judge how phones normally work, what encryption keys are, the implications of wiping an encryption key, and then get someone to show the difference between entering a normal PIN wrong several times and entering the duress PIN. You just need to convince the jury (or judge, if there is no jury for whatever reason).

People have gone to jail or have been executed for less than a glitch. Theoretically a highly charged particle from space could've messed with exactly the right transistors exactly when entering the correct PIN and trigger the wipe process. There is no way to prove that didn't happen. But you don't need that kind of proof.

tosti 10 hours ago|||
Right, the halting problem means one can hardly prove anything at all when it comes to software.
bot403 9 hours ago|||
Sure buddy. And the uncertainty principle means you can't prove I was at the scene of the crime.

The fact phones don't usually wipe themselves will be plenty good for a judge.

Btw: Regardless of the above I support this guy's right to protect his private data from baseless and unreasonable searches. He should not be charged with a crime.

bena 8 hours ago|||
No, it means there is no general solution to the problem of proving software correct. You can prove if a specific program will halt or not given certain parameters. You cannot write an algorithm that will work to prove if any arbitrary program will halt.
bdangubic 11 hours ago|||
> They were going to catch him for something, some day. This incident just provided the necessary excuse to lock him up

funny reading this (don't disagree) and then also reading on HN how China is "bad" this is some gestapo shit but not surprising that it is getting normalised ...

jeroenhd 11 hours ago|||
China is strictly worse than the USA when it comes to border controls. That doesn't mean the USA is good or acceptable in any way; these laws are part of the reason why I don't plan on visiting the country. The USA also has much worse laws on the books, like having to give the authorities your social media passwords to check if you're secretly a terrorist (though that doesn't apply to citizens).

Excessive border patrol power has been around in the USA for ages now, it's all part of the post-9/11 package. I don't think many Americans even know they live in a zone where the border police can do shit like this, even if they haven't left the country, as international airports are usually near big cities, and they have a wide border zone around them. This stuff only really makes it into the news when it happens to one of the "good guys".

iamnothere 10 hours ago||
FWIW the 100 mile airport border zone thing has been debunked, as the 100 mile zone by statute applies only to land and maritime borders. https://www.aclu.org/know-your-rights/border-zone
deaux 11 hours ago|||
China is indeed "bad" for the gestapo shit. The difference is that China's gestapo shit comes with benefits for the common man too, whereas in the US the gestapo shit only serves the inner circle at the top of the regime with zero benefits to 99% of the populace.
catalinbraescu2 5 hours ago||
Kindly list here the most important 3 benefits "for the common man" that accompany "China's Gestapo shit".
superxpro12 5 hours ago||
The right to work 996, obviously!
owlninja 11 hours ago|||
Here's a gift link: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/21/us/politics/samuel-tunick...
dredmorbius 9 hours ago||
Paywall/archive: <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49387289>
shevy-java 1 hour ago||
Isn't that an illegal law though? After all you are not required to aid in the prosecution against yourself, aka you don't have to incriminate yourself. So such a law means that the courts now ignore that law/amendment. Doesn't this make it illegal on this point alone?

Either way the USA needs to stop abusing its citizens. The people need to take back control over the court system. Way too much abuse is happening here. Land of the free no more.

jijji 5 hours ago||
amatuer... when you leave the us you bring a wiped phone, never bring your primary phone/laptop/camera/etc
poulpy123 4 hours ago||
One more reason to not go to the US
tonetheman 2 hours ago|
[dead]
More comments...