Top
Best
New

Posted by dr_pardee 7 hours ago

I spent $266 and four AI models to own my tablet. GLM-5.3 finished it in a day(ericpardee.github.io)
556 points | 241 comments
AntonyGarand 5 hours ago|
Nice to see the capabilities of the model but the article has heavy AI tones, making it boring to read.

an AI:DR; is enough: the models found unpatched vulnerabilities and managed to create an exploit to root the tablet, chinese models did it while American ones fell back to their safeguards.

Grombobulous 2 hours ago||
At this point it’s more exhausting to discuss whether an article was written using AI than it is to accidentally read an article written by AI.

The article was fine. And I totally expect the kind of person spending $200 to viberoot a tablet to write their article using AI. It is what it is.

bonoboTP 3 hours ago|||
Definitely AI written, and it has an annoying bubbly vibe, but the content was interesting nevertheless.

I think those who don't see it as AI just don't read AI text several hours per day, like some of us.

comprev 2 hours ago|||
> Claude Code and I spent months on the cat-and-mouse.

To me this a tell of AI - it should read "cat-and-mouse game."

I think AI sees the cat and mouse as individual objects joined together with a hyphen rather than knowing it's a type of game.

Freedom2 2 hours ago||
It's also the wrong idiom. A cat and mouse game generally implies that the mouse spends time running away and actively evading the mouse. Owning a tablet that isn't receiving updates to a avoid the "cat" isn't that.
yndoendo 1 hour ago||
^Claude Code and I spent ...

Is anthropomorphizing the tool.

Screwdriver and I spent ...

polotics 1 hour ago||||
can you point us towards the specific tells you're seeing in the article. I find the writing maybe LLM-cheerfull yes, but don't see classic phrase patterns.
boldlybold 1 hour ago||
I have seen phrases with "earns its keep" a lot when comparing different algorithms and tradeoffs. "GLM-5.2 cost $21.90, worked overnight as instructed, and earned its keep twice."
BoredomIsFun 2 hours ago|||
I would not call it bubbly; more like 1960s-noir-pulp-fiction-rugged-detective style. Anyway, could be fixed, to some extent with proper prompting.
nateb2022 2 hours ago||
> 1960s-noir-pulp-fiction-rugged-detective style

Straight out of another LLM. Please name some books in this style, since it seems to be on the tip of your tongue.

BoredomIsFun 2 hours ago||
> Straight out of another LLM

??? Not a native speaker, turns out short word is hardboiled.

> Please name some books in this style, since it seems to be on the tip of your tongue.

Googled for you: https://www.google.com/search?q=hardboiled+detective+book

nateb2022 2 hours ago||
Could you expand on how it's pulp-fictitious? Or noir? Or "rugged" detective? Why the "rugged"? I've never heard of the word "hardboiled" referring to anything but eggs.
BoredomIsFun 1 hour ago|||
> I've never heard of the word "hardboiled" referring to anything but eggs.

I am glad you've lerned something new.

nateb2022 1 hour ago||
A human would not have applied any of these terms to the submission, let alone their amalgamation.
all2 1 hour ago|||
"Hardboiled" is a common term used for a certain genre of detective novel.

I don't know of any novels, but I do know that Calvin and Hobbes poked fun at this genre in some of the strips.

I suppose the comic books for Watchmen could fall into this same genre somewhat.

nateb2022 1 hour ago||
This is tangential to the commenter's inability to explain their choice of words which is atypical of a human who would have went with "dense", and suggests a 3T parameter model reaching for "1960s-noir-pulp-fiction-rugged-detective".

AI comments are against the rules and I think the commenter's lack of an explanation for their choice of words sufficiently establishes it wasn't their words to begin with.

raincole 1 hour ago||
Sorry, but you sound more like AI than the commenter to me.
nateb2022 1 hour ago||
"1960s-noir-pulp-fiction-rugged-detective" is incredibly obtuse, do you see any of these applying to the submission?
segmondy 2 hours ago|||
I read the entire article, I love it. Nothing boring about it.
saaaaaam 2 hours ago|||
I read the first few paragraphs and the stench of AI made me stop. Each to his or her own.
dolebirchwood 1 hour ago||
There were still meaningful lessons to take away. Your loss.

Maybe feed the article to another AI to summarize so you'll feel less hoodwinked about someone passing off AI writing as their own?

saaaaaam 1 hour ago||
I don’t feel hoodwinked. There’s just zero point in letting AI write stuff like this because it’s such egregious bullshit. If you want to write something, write it. If you want AI to parade something for you, what are you actually looking for? A pat on the back and a round of applause?
yipinwong 2 hours ago|||
Boring is subjective. I like the article but was boring AF.
AppleBananaPie 3 hours ago|||
I agree. Imo the red flags start when glancing at the section headings (before I started to read the content)
gblargg 2 hours ago|||
The tell.
axiomcle 3 hours ago|||
[flagged]
linkregister 3 hours ago||
There's no prohibition on submitting LLM-written articles. There is a rule against machine-written comments.
joaomoreno 2 hours ago|||
I disagree. It was a good read.
redbell 44 minutes ago|||
> AI:DR

For those who missed it from a week ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49336573

rdiddly 3 hours ago|||
I'm not getting that from it. Although I bet I would, if I started out presuming it's AI and let confirmation bias do the rest.
f311a 3 hours ago|||
Prior to LLMs, I've rarely seen such headings when reading blogs, but now they are everywhere.

From the article:

> A kiosk that kept dying

> “It’s my device”

> Reality television

> The grind

> The relief pitcher

This is one of the giveaways for me.

TheRealPomax 3 hours ago||
1. I've said this in real life

2. I've said this multiple times in real life because fuck FAANG

3. that's a new one for me

4. Every colleague I've worked with has used this in real life, for decades

5. Also a new one

So... sorry what were we talking about?

debugnik 3 hours ago|||
That barely anyone with an organic brain would use any those phrases as a heading, much less all of them.

This article isn't particularly egregious but AI does come up with really cringy headings. Most often "the <irrelevant noun>" over and over.

ungut 10 minutes ago|||
Hmm... I think this could be a case of the organic brain soaking up LLM-isms by the way as it is using these tools intensively. As much as I don't like robot writing, this all seems overly paranoid to me.
fc417fc802 2 hours ago|||
The current frontier models also have a bizarre tendency to prepend said headings with weirdly irrelevant emoji. I really wonder where they picked that up.
akie 1 hour ago||
It was a very prominent trend in frontend and hip JavaScript repositories on GitHub before AI
f311a 3 hours ago||||
Do no try to look at the individual examples, look at the overall style of headings. It's about style, people say such things, they are not unique.
mock-possum 3 hours ago||||
The point is not that no one says these IRL, the point is that LLMs always tend to fall back on this kind of verbiage - they got it from us, they aren’t doing anything new or special, they’re just predisposed towards a very particular kind of voice / word choice in prose.
phatskat 3 hours ago||||
I will echo the flagged comment in spirit:

Those are wild headings that read like an op-ed on a site covered in ads. I've said some of those things irl, and "relief pitcher" is a thing, and in solution those phrases are fine. As section headings it's wild imo

rogerrogerr 3 hours ago|||
I think we’re talking about the obvious AI tells that apparently only some of us can see.

Versus some of us look at five tells and say “nah, this is fine in isolation” over and over.

malshe 3 hours ago||||
I also had the feeling that it's AI written but not everything appeared that way. I checked it with Pangram and GPTZero and both returned with a verdict of a mix of AI and human writing. Pangram thinks it is about 50-50.
rogerrogerr 3 hours ago||
I’m pretty confident it’s AI that has been told to model a writing style.
saaaaaam 2 hours ago||
Only if that writing style is “incoherent bullshit”.

From the article: “It talked itself into helping me by checking whether it should. So it does have some sort of soul. I said that out loud, to an empty room.”

What?!

drakenot 3 hours ago||||
No, the writing style is clearly AI.

I enjoyed the content nonetheless.

jvwww 3 hours ago||||
It's heavily written with AI. Very painful to read.
stavros 3 hours ago|||
> One breath: the use-after-free let us free memory the kernel still used. Winning a race let us reclaim it with controlled data.
rpdillon 2 hours ago||
Yeah, this section stood out the most to me, but I feel it was a decent summary nevertheless.
stavros 2 hours ago||
I agree, I more-or-less enjoyed the post. I just can't read LLM-written posts easily these days, not out of some moral objection, it just gets really boring reading articles from the same author all day, every day.
unixhero 3 hours ago|||
"Managed to root" the tablet is enough
soulofmischief 2 hours ago|||
The numerical fixation right in the title was a dead giveaway.
rpdillon 2 hours ago|||
Picked up the AI vibes as well. Don't mind. Content was there.
culanuchachamim 3 hours ago|||
Yep, heavy AI tone. For me was very interesting and not boring. I'm really hate reading AI when no real information is added, but when it takes you step by step to understand, it's my best tool so far to really understand things.
YoureJealous 4 hours ago|||
[flagged]
bahmboo 3 hours ago|||
[flagged]
mac-attack 4 hours ago|||
Ignore the message because you don't like the _perceived_ messenger.
wafflemaker 4 hours ago|||
It's more like, don't eat ice cream cos they taste stale or wrong. You are not forced to eat or read things you don't like/enjoy. And that's why most of us reads the articles or eat ice cream.

Especially when you can have someone (AI) summarize it.

Almondsetat 3 hours ago||
This is an informative article, not a novel
fc417fc802 2 hours ago||
HN is an ice cream dispenser for nerds so when people start putting gross flavors in you should expect vocal complaints.
sandeepkd 3 hours ago||||
Part of it is bit natural too, a human authored content has its own asymmetries to keep it interesting. LLM generated content is way too verbose and kind of lacks that factor.

Nevertheless, it was interesting experiment, also a bit dangerous reality how people are using LLMs. Just flip the context from user trying to root their own device to some one else's device.

mac-attack 3 hours ago||
You are conflating human-ness with good writing skills.
georgemcbay 4 hours ago||||
Blogs like the one that is linked are almost entirely an entertainment medium disguised as an informational learning lesson. We already know LLMs are pretty good at security exploits, just like we already know they are pretty good at writing typical code.

Because it is an entertainment medium, the voice of the messenger is the only thing that matters and every current LLM has a boring, annoying voice. If you aren't telling us something new you better be telling us something in an entertaining fashion.

exe34 3 hours ago|||
You can just run it through another slopatron to reduce it to the key points.
ghomst 2 hours ago||
Don't know what you're talking about, the article is good. Yes, they used ai, but this is what ai SHOULD be used for. AI should be used for either very small projects that nobody wants to do or very extreme missions that could take months.
anonuser123 2 hours ago|||
It's the writing style of AI. It's quite problematic for a lot of people.

I often really want to read articles, but the minute is encounter claude-speak, I (a) either leave (90%+ of the time) or (b) ask another AI to rewrite it using simple english or in a style of another writer in that space (yes, I know, it's ironical).

Just hard to read AI-ism.

The load bearing fact is it's not the content, or the originality, or the perceived lack of effort, it's reading the same trope for the 10000th time, and experiencing something akin to ad-blindness.

feralsandwich 2 hours ago||||
The issue isn't with using AI for finding an exploit, it's with using an AI to write up the article for human consumption about it.
BoredomIsFun 2 hours ago|||
> it's with using an AI to write up the article for human consumption about it.

Nothing wrong with it, as soon as it is not obviously AI-generated looking and has good, high quality content.

k_roy 2 hours ago|||
Seems kind of subjective innit?
fc417fc802 2 hours ago||
Taste is subjective of course, but when 80% (or whatever) of your potential audience dislikes something perhaps you should just accept that it's a bad idea.
pbhjpbhj 2 hours ago||
Thing is, using ML they can make more than 5 times as many articles. And I suspect those who don't object to wasting more time on an article because it was produced in a protracted way probably clock through on ads more. So annoying 80% of people might still get them more revenue in the end.
fc417fc802 1 hour ago||
That is a fair point - hopefully there won't be any hard feelings when the 80% attempt to censor such slop from their platforms of choice. Taste is subjective and I come to HN for things that taste good. (Notably this leaves the door wide open for AI authored content with a decent tone.)
aprilthird2021 2 hours ago|||
The writing style was boring I also stopped reading halfway through esp after I read that a similar tablet had already been rooted in the past and documented online using the same exploit the AI successfully used
mrandish 2 hours ago||
I bought 4 of the same tablet (Fire HD 10) on Black Friday 2021 for Home Assistant dashboards and a Fire HD 10 Pro (edit: actually Plus) I use as an E-reader/browser (with KOReader/Firefox). To save money I got the cheaper version with lockscreen ads pre-installed but before ever letting them online I ran Fire Toolbox to remove the ads, debloat, block updating and install Google services. Fire Toolbox is excellent: https://xdaforums.com/t/windows-linux-tool-fire-toolbox-v45-...

I've never had the problems OP describes but my tablets all came with FireOS v7.3.2.1 and I've never let them update. I think Amazon started locking down later firmware versions more but Fire Toolbox can still do quite a bit to tame and decruft later versions. The XDA forum for Fire Toolbox has a lot of posts covering exploits and workarounds for later FireOS versions.

Once the Amazon cruft is tamed, I still haven't found a meaningfully better 10-inch thin/light Android tablet than the 2021 Fire HD 10 Pro. It has wireless charging, weighs 430g and at 247 x 166 x 9.2 mm no one makes a 10" that's much lighter, smaller or thinner. The only slight downside is FireOS 7 is based on Android 9 and new versions of a few apps are starting to require later APIs. I'd gladly pay ~$250 for a 10" Android 16 tablet with wireless charging that was as thin & light but had smaller bezels for overall smaller size.

drnick1 2 hours ago||
> Once the Amazon cruft is tamed, I still haven't found a meaningfully better 10-inch thin/light Android tablet than the 2021 Fire HD 10 Pro.

It is shocking that no mainstream tablet manufacturer will let buyers exercise control over their device. At the very least, this means having root and being able to use it to purge unwanted software. Ideally, it also means being able to fully replace the stock OS with third party/open firmware.

KetoManx64 1 hour ago|||
The only one that does openly is Google at this point with their Pixel Tablet from 2024 or so, which I think they didn't do a second version of.

I'm running GrapheneOS on mine, same with my Pixel phone.

hahajk 1 hour ago|||
Doesn't the pixel tablet come with an unlocked bootloader?
saidinesh5 42 minutes ago|||
But Pixel tablet is fairly old these days no? 3-4 years old these days?
drnick1 1 hour ago|||
Good point, this seems to be a real alternative, and it even supports GrapheneOS.
ck2 2 hours ago||
I think you mean the "plus" not "pro"

The Plus model has more ram (memory) and wireless charging than the base model

It only comes in Slate dark-grey color and is often resold on Amazon's Woot ("used like new")

I have one, bought a year ago anticipating this would eventually happen, exciting times lol

Now we'll get LineageOS on this with newer Android within another year

* https://computers.woot.com/offers/amazon-fire-hd-10-tablet-2...

mrandish 1 hour ago|||
> I think you mean the "plus" not "pro"

Yes, you're correct (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08F6FYN6B). Wireless charging and 4gb RAM vs 3gb. I think the 2021 Fire HD 10 Plus may have been the only ~10-inch tablet ever with Qi charging.

For a thin & light e-reader/browser it's really perfect because it sits on the cradle on my nightstand always charged and ready to go. The display size feels like a hardback page. Now that it's been rooted, I'm really hoping for Lineage OS.

ck2 16 minutes ago||
btw I've discovered you can turn on the display by tapping a magnet at the upper left corner

it's a pain compared to tap-to-wake but we'll have to wait for that

better than reaching for the power button in the dark, you can put magnet on a string or tape

I think it's meant for cases to turn on the screen when you open their flap

I basically need a 10" tablet as my android "phone" because I'm old/sick and cannot see tiny screens so the FireHD 10 series is perfect

and everything is stupid apps now, even blood pressure meter needs an app

OH I forgot to mention you can run system-user as a pseudo-root too, even before this root method was invented

yjftsjthsd-h 1 hour ago|||
> Now we'll get LineageOS on this with newer Android within another year

I would very much like that, but do we have a solution to the locked bootloader? My recollection is that on previous fire tablets, the only way to get a custom rom was to do an ugly hack that still uses the stock kernel because that's the only thing that's signed in a way the bootloader will run. Which is still something but it's a big caveat.

ck2 1 hour ago||
They've managed to unlock the bootloader on Fire tablets up until 2019

so just guessing give them a year, lol

what will drive it to happen is Amazon is still selling hundreds of this tablet via Woot for $25-$35, they drop it in batches every few months as they refurb them

Mine looks and works like brand new for $25

Just without LineageOS I cannot do tap-to-wake or dual-mode usb-on-the-go while charging like the pre-2019 tablets

rcarmo 4 hours ago||
As I was reading this, I realized that the ESP32 HomeKit debugging session I had running was taking a while, and this happened:

Me: what are you doing?

Agent: I’m resolving Apple’s private video-resolution lookup table to determine whether iOS 26 supports 320×240 for HomeKit live streaming.

The decompiled source hides the numeric constants, so I:

- Downloaded/extracted the iOS 26.1 arm64e dyld cache to /workspace/tmp/ios26-dyld/.

- Built and installed the read-only apfs-fuse utility needed to mount Apple’s APFS image.

- Planned to extract HomeKitDaemon and decode its resolution table.

Me: Oh, OK. Carry on then

These are weird times.

ctxc 4 hours ago|
It's insane, right? Reverse engineering is so much fun, I find myself doing it on random apps so often now
bpavuk 3 hours ago|||
it's especially fun when you do it yourself, I advise toying around with https://crackmes.one. with time and practice, everything becomes open-source because you can read assembly XD
fragmede 3 hours ago||
Not legally, which is the issue. I can "open source" Windows 11 and rip out some of the shittiness, but Microsoft is gonna take issue. If it were MIT licensed that would be a different story, but there isn't enough money for lawyers in the world where it's not.
kevin_thibedeau 2 hours ago|||
Reverse engineering is legal in the US. You just can't disseminate the results if it runs afoul of copyright law or patents.
bpavuk 2 hours ago||
who said that you still technically cannot disseminate the results? bulletproof hosting and private communications still exist. if law is being used to harm the consumer, the consumer in question has full moral right to speak out against it, and taking ownership of your hardware (like OP tells they did) is one of the best ways
bpavuk 3 hours ago||||
I know enough people for whom this risk is the entire appeal
fc417fc802 2 hours ago|||
So what? Just be mindful of what you post on the clearnet. What you're doing is like worrying about the illegality of making sparkler bombs in your backyard IMO.
jaggederest 3 hours ago|||
We're entering an age where doing binary modification on live binaries is not a huge deal. Everything is now open "source"?
simpaticoder 2 hours ago|||
What is it called when there's a process that's available to individuals but is long and onerous and cannot be shared among them? Saying the binaries are open source now means that the work of reverse engineering will be repeated exactly in proportion to the number of times it's modified. I would argue on a large scale this is still effectively closed source.
jaggederest 2 hours ago||
As soon as you can share binary patches (highly illegal of course) we're off to the races.
shepherdjerred 2 hours ago|||
Binary patches aren’t illegal right? How would they be?
jaggederest 1 hour ago||
CFAA and friends (in the US, at least) means that even things you might not otherwise expect are illegal get turned into super illegal.

Binary patches are probably fine to make, but to distribute them for other people's binaries is probably not.

fc417fc802 2 hours ago|||
More like mildly illegal. Seems on par with torrents to me.
debugnik 3 hours ago|||
I would move the quotes to "open" since the issue of licensing is still left. Although LLM providers have shown that they don't care about copyright so it should go both ways.
jaggederest 2 hours ago||
Quotes for all of it, it's a closed binary that is transparently user modifiable these days I guess, so "open" "source".
Almondsetat 3 hours ago||
I know this might be controversial, but unleashing a sea of models to reverse engineer hardware and give it open source and linux support might just be the future
imhoguy 3 hours ago||
Or create simpler and open-source alternatives to crapware Android apps to control BLE devices, elliptical trainer on my next list.
megous 2 hours ago|||
Yep, I bought a Brother printer+scanner a few days ago. Their Linux driver is a mess of perl+binary blobs with a completely bizarre architecture where one blob constantly rewrites some pointless config file just so that other binary blob can read it during the same print job. Of course no ARM support. Scanner driver was also a massive blob doing almost nothing but some simple USB communication.

I had it re-written into a nice cups C filter driver, verified against original to produce identical output, easy to install and manage on my Orange Pi boards to serve as a network printer server for this USB only printer, before the printer even arrived.

The same with the scanner driver. Instead of taking a `sane` route, I just had LLM write a small dependency-less Linux C program to get the scans with nice CLI UX on top, fit for my needs.

Everyhting about 10x simpler than the manufacturer code, yet still fully featured.

Had some time so I asked for NEON+AVX2 optimizations. Got them too, so the filter is 5x faster than the original. :D

Good times.

fragmede 3 hours ago|||
Or just any pain point, really. I can now tell my computer that python is broken and it'll just fix it. 2027, year of Linux desktop‽
simbas 3 hours ago||
this is the way
cgearhart 5 hours ago||
I understand why “prompt kiddie” feels accurate, but I don’t think it is. Expertise is _amplified_ with LLM agents. The same $300 of tokens given to my plumber—who is an _excellent_ plumber—is unlikely to produce the same outcome.
sanex 3 hours ago||
A friend of mine who has at most written some SQL joins recently bought a cheap thermal printer on Amazon. The printer was meant to be used with a heavily ad and microstransaction laden app to operate over Bluetooth. He was able to use codex to hook it up to his MacBook and reverse engineer the printer then make a web service so he can print whatever he wants from anywhere.

I agree with you in that I now feel like a 100x engineer, but I think it would have taken me a long time to figure that one out pre AI.

jonahx 3 hours ago|||
My experience with non-technical people using AI is not like this at all. Perhaps your friend is an outlier?
gurjeet 2 hours ago||
GP's friend knows SQL joins, so I wouldn't lump her into the 'non-technical' group.
ModernMech 1 hour ago||
There's a lot of people who know Excel and SQL who otherwise don't know anything else technical. By my measure what they do is programming but a lot of people don't see it that way.
rescbr 1 hour ago||
This is why I'm optimistic that we'll see a renaissance in hobby computing.

AI is the new BASIC.

aprilthird2021 2 hours ago|||
At most written some SQL joins implies your friend is far more tech savvy than the average plumber
Aurornis 2 hours ago|||
There is something amazing about letting the computer work at something tirelessly until it gets to a working solution.

I’m also amazed at how often I can speed up the process by reviewing progress, inserting my knowledge, stopping it from pursuing dead ends, and redirecting effort. Something that the LLM might have finished in 2 hours can be done in 20 minutes with me paying close attention and intervening.

segmondy 2 hours ago|||
Yup, OP has domain knowledge in software/security so they knew how to steer. it's like knowing how a rudder can control an aircraft doesn't make you capable of flying one.
risyachka 4 hours ago|||
The better the models are the less this is true. If the prompt history is smth like “goal: root this tablet” and it did all on its own - then you plumber can 100% achieve same result in same amount of time.
fluidcruft 3 hours ago||
I think the intent of the question is whether the plumber would know they want the tablet rooted.
fn-mote 3 hours ago||
Clearly not, IMO.

The GP poster is someone who is familiar with the problems caused by AI writing code. For example: reimplementing major functionality because the AI isn’t aware of it (somehow). There are many tasks that domain-specific knowledge is required to successfully guide the AI.

Apparently this is not one of them, though, so it’s an interesting story.

yieldcrv 4 hours ago|||
Summer 2026 models are able to fix everything I vibe coded late 2025 that got too unwieldy
jdiff 4 hours ago||
I don't think the word "amplification" is accurate. I don't know why, but while engineering techbro circles love "multipliers," but those very very rarely exist in real life.

You do need a baseline of knowledge to be able to prompt the AI in a domain successfully. But beyond that baseline there are rapidly diminishing returns. Someone with skill far beyond a certain line won't get amplified the same way someone who just clears that line will.

compiler-devel 4 hours ago|||
This is patently false, see Tao’s recent use of ChatGPT regarding the Jacobian conjecture.
jack_pp 3 hours ago|||
Depends on the context.

In this case he is right : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49239999

fn-mote 3 hours ago||
Your quote shows someone BELOW the line being able to do something. That could not be considered amplification because multiplying a skill of 0 doesn’t get you anywhere. But if you want to see it that way, it doesn’t bother me.

The Tao reference is someone far ABOVE the line getting excellent results from the LLM.

So in this case the Tao example refutes the GGP claim.

beepbooptheory 3 hours ago|||
Kinda talking about pretty squishy things here, saying something is "patently false" in the context feels pretty stifling, or at least uncharitable.

Like, what, we are all supposed to close the book on this abstract, very new question. Something that by any approximation is extremely nuanced and also pretty meaningful? Like, "oh OK, well I guess that's that then!"

qeternity 2 hours ago||||
They are talking about breadth, not depth, multipliers in almost every circumstance.

A great X will be able to do far more great X stuff (breadth), and perhaps also be a greater X (depth).

But it's most certainly weighted in favor of the former than the latter.

petra 4 hours ago|||
What is the baseline, roughly? Let's say I want to be useful in a given domain(one with rich machine feedback), with the help of the AI, what should I study ?
fn-mote 3 hours ago|||
AI security.
jack_pp 3 hours ago|||
Ask the AI
bpavuk 3 hours ago||
okay. where is the source code? the writeup (HANDOFF link at the end) looks decent at the first glance, and it's much more easy to rebuild an exploit from a writeup than without it, but I don't feel like hunting down a tablet with your exact Fire OS version, importing U.S. hardware into Ukraine, paying all the levies, shipment costs, etc. only to get my hands on the hardware and hack it myself to see if your exploit works. this entire thing too easily could be moot.

in tangential defense, I can only say that Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite was enough for me to set older Dishonored: DotO builds free of Denuvo yet it had much harder time with DEATHLOOP, so I don't discard this article too easily. (in fact, I alone went much farther than any LLM I threw at it at the time Gemini 2.5 was a hot thing.) still, I have sky-high doubts about it. too hard to falsify

okamiueru 1 hour ago|
Supposedly this:

- https://github.com/ericpardee/fire-hd-ownership/blob/main/po... - https://github.com/ericpardee/fire-hd-ownership/blob/main/gr...

Occams Razor still makes it more likely that it's all BS, either psychosis (like the guy who genuinely thought he had invented new math because the LLM told him), bad faith PR (AI companies are squirming to IPO).

There are more than a few smelly elements. There isn't a screenshot of actual root being shown in any terminal. Just the LLM output saying "I totally achieved root, OMG, you're gonna be so famous" (paraphrasing to enhance the intellectual absence).

Not saying this doesn't work as reported. Its just... weird. If it actually achieved root, you can show that much more effectively, by showing that part. It's written like a blog post for a food recipe. I don't care about your trip to Bali that redefined your understanding of understanding.

The section where the LLM claimed to have achieved root, which the author is convinced of, because the tablet was rebooted. "It then cold-rebooted the tablet and re-rooted it in four minutes to prove the win was repeatable. Fair.". You can reboot many Linux systems from userland. It smell like psychosis to me. At least enough so that I'm happy to ignore this until someone actually does a PoC, and shows the results of it. (An LLM output saying it did "trust me", doesn't really cut it).

Wowfunhappy 29 minutes ago||
> API Error: Opus 4.8’s safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions.

Wait, Opus 4.8 has a safeguards classifier too? Is this recent? I've never seen them for 4.8, only Opus 5 and of course Fable 5?

soared 3 hours ago||
Would anyone be able to describe the workflow set up? OP, how are you getting seemingly innocuous prompts to run for so long?

I’d like to improve my skills - I am surely in actual prompt kiddie territory.

But I’ve got a personal injury claim coming up that is very complex, with tons of docs, legal speak, laws, etc. I’m hoping to have a set up like OPs that can go deep for a long time. How do I set that up? (Currently looking at Claude projects for context file storage, and just asking gemini for now to convert pdfs to raw text, and summarize them)

I’ve also got a cheap scanner that throws errors no matter what os/hardware I use. Sounds like a fun thing to throw some time at.

bbarn 2 hours ago||
You should be in your project description stating something like I know you are not a lawyer but use your best effort to help me find supporting legal information as by law I am allowed to represent myself.

I did this for a demand letter for a friend who was fired after reporting a sexual harassment claim in California - which is a legitimate duty to investigate.

Gareth321 1 hour ago|||
I have compared Opus 5 High and Sol High for legal advice and I consider the advice infinitely better with Sol. Far fewer hallucinations (zero, in fact, with Sol and the right prompt). The suggested text and responses also felt much less like AI. The research was more accurate with Sol. It's positively German in its attention to detail and thirst for being technically correct. Which is exactly what you want in a legal case. Opus 5 High is more of an ideas guy and is much less concerned with the letter of the law.
hnburnsy 2 hours ago|||
>I’ve also got a cheap scanner that throws errors no matter what os/hardware I use. Sounds like a fun thing to throw some time at.

Did you try NAPS2 or Vuescan?

trvz 2 hours ago||
Simple, ask the AI to give you a prompt that triggers extensive research or work into a topic.
Shuddown 5 hours ago||
So all we need to get models to hack hardened devices is the promise of fame on Hacker News.
abracadaniel 5 hours ago||
It would be interesting to see someone try to tackle modern consoles like the PS5
simonklitj 5 hours ago|||
The PS5 jailbreak scene is pretty sizable. Good chunk of money to be made if accomplished: https://bounties.fulu.org/bounties/playstation-5
LorenDB 5 hours ago||||
I was thinking maybe reverse engineering newer Apple Silicon devices to port Linux.
orangecat 4 hours ago||
Fable was able to get Linux booting on my M4 Pro mini. (Using Asahi as a base, not possible to upstream because they really don't like AI). Hardware support beyond USB 2.0 requires tracing macOS under the hypervisor, which Fable refuses to do and Opus isn't much good at. I'll try Sol at some point.
fragmede 2 hours ago||
You don't have to upstream it, but if you stuck it in GitHub or whatever so everybody else could pick up the source code changes, that'd be neat.
rsync 2 hours ago|||
No, the highest priority is Sonos.

Presumably the difficulty level is low and the community/societal justice extremely high.

kestrel-robotic 5 hours ago||
sudo make-me-a-sandwich strikes again.
bordercontrol 5 hours ago|
Great write-up. The biggest problem with GLM/Kimi is exactly this: they often miss obvious failure points. Claude/Codex tend to catch these kinds of issues pretty quickly. They’ll basically go, “Wait, step back,” rethink the problem for a while, and start questioning their underlying assumptions.

That’s why I always prompt GLM to explicitly map out and question all of its assumptions. It helps a lot when it gets “stuck” on a wrong line of reasoning.

mannanj 4 hours ago|
You don't think AI wrote most of it?
bordercontrol 3 hours ago|||
I never ask that question. What does knowing the answer actually change by itself?
bevr1337 4 hours ago|||
[flagged]
ByThyGrace 3 hours ago|||
You know you can quickly skim through any user's comment history? I think this one passes the eye test. It's not improbable but I think you're just paranoid if you believe this 2022 account was created to astroturf Kimi/GLM today.
fn-mote 2 hours ago||
1. Account from September 2021 with only 56 karma makes me look twice, regardless of the date.

2. However, there are some very human looking posts (I hope) like this 2023 one:

3. Account is posted admitted ChatGPT summaries in 2023 so… even if it’s sometimes a human speaking, sometimes it’s not.

bordercontrol 3 hours ago|||
Any x is a y.
More comments...