Top
Best
New

Posted by dsalzman 10 hours ago

Actinide is first startup to produce high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU)(www.actinideinc.com)
146 points | 77 commentspage 2
johnea 9 hours ago|
[flagged]
maxall4 9 hours ago||
I’m no expert, but I don’t believe that “high-assay low-enriched uranium” is the sort you can use in nuclear weapons, per it being “low-enriched”. According to the DOE, HALEU only goes up to 20% enrichment [0]. Nuclear weapons, it seems, need it to be enriched beyond 20% [1]

[0] https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/what-high-assay-low-enric... [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enriched_uranium

NewJazz 9 hours ago||
Dirty bombs
comicjk 9 hours ago||
Uranium-235 isn't useful for dirty bombs: it's too long-lived and not radioactive enough. Making dangerous levels of radiation requires short-lived isotopes. Some of these are the products of uranium fission, which is why spent uranium fuel is a radiation hazard. But isolating U-235 just to fission it to get radioactive isotopes like cesium-137 would not be the easiest way to get them.
lightedman 8 hours ago|||
"Uranium-235 isn't useful for dirty bombs"

It is when your goal is to throw a ton of alpha emitters into the environment for the population to ingest. Do you remember your nuclear cookie thought experiment?

ben_w 8 hours ago||
Uranium-235 has a half-life of 704 million years.

It emits so slowly that the main hazard is heavy metal poisoning, which you'd also get from the depleted uranium that's a waste product from enrichment.

From the numbers I see on https://www.iaea.org/topics/spent-fuel-management/depleted-u..., if a dirty bomb with 1kg of 100% pure Uranium-235 exploded and evenly deposited a fine dust over a 170 by 170 meter square of typical soil, the total Uranium-235 (and specifically that isotope) of the top meter would only double; the total mass of uranium in that volume would only go up by 0.7%.

  The average concentration of natural uranium in soil is about 2 parts per million, which is equivalent to 2 grams of uranium in 1000 kg of soil. This means that the top metre of soil in a typical 10 m ´ 40 m garden contains about 2 kg of uranium (corresponding to about 50,000,000 Bq of activity just from the decay of the uranium isotopes and ignoring the considerable activity associated with the decay of the progeny. Concentrations of uranium in granite range from 2 parts per million to 20 parts per million. Uranium in higher concentrations (50 - 1000 mg per kg of soil) can be found in soil associated with phosphate deposits. In air, uranium exists as dust. Very small, dust-like particles of uranium in the air are deposited onto surface water, plant surfaces, and soil. These particles of uranium eventually end up back in the soil or in the bottom of lakes, rivers, and ponds, where they mix with the natural uranium that is already there. Typical activity concentrations of uranium in air are around 2 µBq per cubic metre. (UNSCEAR 2000).
- ibid
rotringlvr 9 hours ago|||
[dead]
Legend2440 9 hours ago|||
>Private enterprise enriching uranium is a seriously worrying development...

Or seriously exciting. We might actually get affordable, clean nuclear energy this century.

philipkglass 9 hours ago||
Urenco USA is a private enterprise that enriches uranium. It built its first American enrichment plant 20 years ago, and lately it has been expanding capacity:

https://urencousa.com/about/our-history

The parent Urenco company has been operating private uranium enrichment plants in Europe since the 1970s.

chasd00 9 hours ago|||
Pantex is outside Amarillo, that's where all the US's nukes come from. If Texas wanted nukes ( well more nukes actually ) they'd juts place an order.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantex

porkpieshoe 9 hours ago||
Pantex doesn't power a panopticon, nor does it threaten my livelihood.
porkpieshoe 5 hours ago||
Since I got downvoted for posting that, I'll also add that Pantex doesn't cause a sudden and massive spike in electricity usage, with the potential for related costs to be socialized into my bill.
charliebwrites 9 hours ago|||
I’m just waiting for one of these private rocket companies to buy a private nuclear enriching company

We could reach Lex Luther level villainy in no time at all

rotringlvr 9 hours ago|||
[dead]
tmp10423288442 7 hours ago||
Iran is essentially finished at this point - they no longer have control over the Strait of Hormuz, and oil is rapidly flowing through the strait (to say nothing of the oil already exported via other pipelines, or the impetus the war gave to accelerate pipelines under construction, such as the Iraq-Turkey pipeline).
benabbott 9 hours ago||
[flagged]
jryle70 6 hours ago||
Why is it careless? and how do you know they didn't invest effort in the homepage, maybe even more with AI than if they didn't use it.

Plenty of human made websites with terrible graphics. We'd complain, but we wouldn't say the content is worthless because the art looks bad.

AbraKdabra 9 hours ago|||
[flagged]
margalabargala 8 hours ago||
Only if you round down, because you're right, most internet traffic these days are bots anyway. The bots definitely don't care if you AI generate your writing.

Many humans do care if you AI generate your writing, and won't read it if it's blatant. But as you say, the humans are a tiny fraction of total net traffic, who cares.

yieldcrv 9 hours ago||
I like the part where you act like they would have ever had images otherwise
kaashif 8 hours ago|||
Pointless images are bad. Like those images at the top of blog posts, I didn't like those pre AI.
pavel_lishin 8 hours ago|||
That would have been fine.
datakan 9 hours ago||
So will we start bombing Dallas now?
cicko 8 hours ago||
No. Economic sanctions are in right now. Maybe tomorrow.
lotsofpulp 9 hours ago|||
Might make it more walkable.
chasd00 9 hours ago||
hah probably help cool things off too.
doodlebugging 6 hours ago|||
If they do I hope they leave Deep Elum alone. Some nice venues there for local, regional, and much more well-known bands. Also a few good restaurants in the area.
theredleft 9 hours ago||
Hegseth is on it
josefritzishere 9 hours ago||
I have a bad feeling.
futura_heavy 9 hours ago|
Is it the menacing guys in the photo, or that headache-inducing logo?
jmward01 8 hours ago||
The logo. Definitely the logo. It both sucks you in and repels you at the same time. 'eye catching' to say the least, but so are laser pointers.
shevy-java 9 hours ago||
They are killing the environment now. I remember this discussion some 25 or 30 years ago in serbia, e. g. depleted uranium. Well, guess some company always wants to find ways for dumping or lifting-up radioactive substance.
netik 6 hours ago|
This is highly dangerous, right? If a bad actor possess centrifuge technology and can divert this <20% enriched uranium, they are essentially days or weeks away from achieving weapons-grade material.

This severely reduces the "breakout time" the international community relies on to detect and stop nuclear proliferation.

jjk166 5 hours ago||
If the bad actor has centrifuge technology and access to low enriched uranium, they are already weeks away from achieving weapons grade material. If a country with Iran's enrichment capabilities had a sufficient LEU stockpile swapped for an equivalent amount of HALEU, it would shave about 7 days off the time necessary to produce a bomb's worth of weapons grade uranium.

For nations with enrichment capabilities, enrichment is not a major contributor to overall breakout time. Enrichment doesn't take much time, it's building enrichment facilities that takes a while, especially clandestinely.

AngryData 5 hours ago||
Centrifuge and nuclear technology is not some latest and greatest super complicated and barely understood technology with hard to source components anymore. Old restrictions like ball bearings quality on export and such are basically meaningless today. You can buy common tooling today from China that would trounce anything people were using 60 years ago and nobody has stopped people from studying and researching nuclear technologies.

It is mostly a matter of money and international politics now. It takes a significant amount of money to build and power, and it is hard to hide the scale of building and power usage from international watchdogs. Because nothing consumes tons of energy and doesn't output tons of product to sell except for nuclear material refinement for weapons.

jjk166 5 hours ago||
> it is hard to hide the scale of building and power usage from international watchdogs. Because nothing consumes tons of energy and doesn't output tons of product to sell except for nuclear material refinement for weapons.

Until datacenters

fc417fc802 11 minutes ago||
Just wait, we might well have some sort of AI nonproliferation effort soon enough. I eagerly await any chip under 5 nm being subject to national security regulations.