Top
Best
New

Posted by meetpateltech 4 hours ago

Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX(openai.com)
295 points | 110 commentspage 3
sidcool 2 hours ago|
This is personal, not business.
rolymath 1 hour ago||
Feels like scam altam writes the openai blog posts himself. The way Musk is brought up feels very 'mean girl'y
akmarinov 1 hour ago||
This low key confirms Astra for November
benatkin 2 hours ago||
It's going to be tough for Origin, their code hosting platform, to follow in the footsteps of GitHub, if they can't be treated as a neutral party.
thoughtpeddler 3 hours ago||
Spend a lot of time thinking about why individuals shouldn't trust large AI cos, now it's interesting getting to think about how the AI companies themselves don't trust each other. Capitalism is viciously cold and uncaring.
gnarlouse 3 hours ago||
At least capitalism isn't at the center of the most impactful technological revolution in human history.
thoughtpeddler 16 minutes ago|||
Not sure the larger point you're trying to make (maybe we're on the same page?), but it's a fact that AI has come from heavy long-term investments by the academic and public sectors, yet private companies are accruing most of the gains
blackqueeriroh 2 hours ago|||
Yeah, that’s mostly been driven by socialism
fhn 2 hours ago||
show me a communist country
timmmmmmay 15 minutes ago||
back when the USSR was still a going concern, there were zero American leftists claiming that it wasn't really communist. that only started happening after they failed
inigyou 6 minutes ago||
did they even have the internet back then? how much did people know about other countries?
demibabs 4 hours ago||
Wow, I don’t use cursor but that seems pretty bad for them.

Is there a way to work around this (like using your OpenAI limits directly?)

charrondev 4 hours ago||
I used cursor extensively both at work and for personal use. Its harness is pretty darn good but I basically never used OpenAI models in it.

The first party cursor models (initially composer and now grok-cursor) and price very competitively for their quality and have very generous usage limits included in the base plans, and then per token pricing afterwards.

Occasionally I’ve used some of the Anthropic models in it but found their cost massively outweighed the benefits for the type of usage we do.

I was using Sonnet 4.5 and 4.6 for a while but the newer models are a lot more expensive at the per-token pricing.

auscompgeek 3 hours ago|||
Cursor does currently allow users to BYO OpenAI token. Given Cursor won't have access to OpenAI models for prompt engineering/evals though, there's definitely a question of whether they'd allow picking any new OpenAI models, assuming the BYOK option continues to exist at all.
Maxious 40 minutes ago||
Email to customers now "We’re speaking with the OpenAI team to resolve this, and we will share more in the coming weeks around continuity of access to OpenAI models. We’ll continue to offer ways to access all models in Cursor.
ralusek 2 hours ago||
It's basically not going to affect them at all. I don't know a single person that uses OpenAI models via Cursor. Saw another comment say it was 5%.
hirako2000 20 minutes ago||
All it shows is that openai is likely still subsidizing inference, sees no value in integration buried within other branded tooling competing with theirs.
skeledrew 3 hours ago||
> We are making this choice because we cannot be confident that SpaceX will use our technology within our terms of service, based on our experience with Elon Musk's companies violating contracts.

> After Musk acquired Twitter, now part of SpaceX, the company broke (opens in a new window) the terms of our contract (alongside many others).

I have never seen one large company throw another large company under the bus without any legalese filters like this before. Wondering if OpenAI site got pwned. Or maybe we in some strange, alternative reality. I doubt even their LLMs would be this frank.

AirMax98 2 hours ago||
And to announce it on a Friday night. Brutal.
Palmik 19 minutes ago|||
Elon Musk openly admitted to distilling OpenAI's models during his lawsuit against OpenAI. [1]

[1] https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopequenoiv/2026/04/30/elo...

the_real_cher 3 hours ago||
Sam and Elon have a long standing feud. This is more than just bad blood between companies.
skeledrew 3 hours ago||
Still, where's the legalese? I'd expect something like this on an individual's blog, not a company's.
mikeyouse 2 hours ago||
They can skip the legalese because Musk had testified under oath that Grok was distilling OpenAI models while Elon was on the board of OpenAI.

https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/921546/e...

__initbrian__ 3 hours ago||
they’ll see an uptick in codex user count trying the new models and can build a narrative around that too
Y0s 4 hours ago||
So Astra release Friday 13th November!?
Jcampuzano2 4 hours ago|
The way I read the article was that they will continue providing their current models, but won't let them use any newer ones announced even between now and the end date. But I might be wrong.

> we’ve decided to hold the contract cancellation to the latest date we can while not providing future models to Cursor.

est 2 hours ago|
Models are now having much tighter integration with harness.

It's gunna to happen anyway.

We are sailing into the age of vertically integrated intelligence.

More comments...