Top
Best
New

Posted by teekert 18 hours ago

Can I opt out of my input or output data being used for training?(help.mistral.ai)
412 points | 177 commentspage 3
threecheese 12 hours ago|
Realistically, what are the risks? I get not wanting info you provide to AI being used against you in the future, like if you are gay and move to a country where that’s illegal (or live in one where it becomes illegal), but is “training” an actual risk here? I would assume that PII is redacted, and so beyond redaction failure, the real risk here seems to be to intellectual property and not to personal privacy.

Edit: Does “use for training” include “we store all your chat logs forever tied to your identity”?

randomblock1 11 hours ago||
The retain it for "the duration necessary to achieve the intended purposes", which could mean forever.
LtWorf 11 hours ago||
Seems in USA you can go to jail for going somewhere else to legally have an abortion. So for example that.
lukeschlather 14 hours ago||
I'd be interested in some legal/GDPR takes on PII handling in prompts. If someone enters PII into a prompt, and Mistral retains it for training, is it sufficient for them to say "don't enter PII into prompts?"

Of course with Claude and so on this bothers me too, but it doesn't seem like there's any real recourse under US law. But I would hope that "oh you shouldn't enter PII" isn't going to cut it under European law, that if I say "don't store my prompts, they include PII I don't want you storing" should be sufficient here under the GDPR and Mistral shouldn't be able to just store it anyway.

TZubiri 14 hours ago|
They might circumvent this by adding a prompt like "remove PII from this prompt", so I don't think it's a worthwhile route. The issue exists whether PII is input or not, like IP or secrets.
htrp 16 hours ago||
LeChat when it was launched as a consumer product was always going to be a data acquisition play.

This is them just making it very clear and disclosing as per European rules.

vb-8448 16 hours ago||
My bet is that mistral models will suddenly start to shine.
perks_12 16 hours ago||
I assume they do this no before releasing new models. It feels like they expect higher user influx from their new models.
DanielHall 15 hours ago||
Just to achieve a great ideal: MEGA Make Europe Great Again.
croes 5 hours ago||
> users are not opted out by default

Of course because you can’t be opt out by default that would be called opt in.

EFLKumo 13 hours ago||
Come on, think how fast Grok evolves after SoaceXAI acquired Cursor. I just believe if you can't get enough real data from practice then you can't train a good model. And for Mistral collecting data is a must step no matter what approach it takes.
danelski 16 hours ago||
Most commenters here clutching their pearls as if Claude and Gemini Pro didn't do it already. In the latter you (as a paying customer) can't even store the chat history unless you agree to their 'improvement of services'. Do you have all your accounts paid for by the enterprise or you never check the settings?
rdm_blackhole 15 hours ago|
> Most commenters here clutching their pearls as if Claude and Gemini Pro didn't do it already.

That's not the point though. The problem is that in the minds of lots of people including here on HN or otherwise, a service based in the EU is de-facto "more" respectful of digital privacy.

You can read the comments on threads related to the EU tech where you will find people defending to the very end that privacy is better in the EU and that EU providers will never stoop as low as their US counterparts.

As always the truth is a lot murkier than that.

Yes, some services based in the EU are better in terms of privacy but it's not a given for all of them and it depends entirely on the service. Unfortunately such a nuanced take is not wildly popular in the tech world in this day and age where every US company is labelled as an evil data hungry entity and EU companies are portrayed as saints in this regard.

That's where the first problem lies.

The second problem is that for years now, people have been singing the praises of Mistral as a privacy friendly alternative the the US juggernauts because Mistral's headquarters is located in the EU and unfortunately today it seems some people are waking up to the fact that Mistral is doing the same thing than its US counterparts and they are disappointed which is understandable.

Who is to blame for this dichotomy? Is it Mistral who leaned too much on this marketing angle (the European Chatgpt without the invasive tracking/ better privacy settings) or is it the users who failed to realize that EU or not, Mistral wasn't going to pass on the opportunity to improve its models this way?

My hunch is that it's both.

icantevenhold 14 hours ago||
No one is saying that every US company is an evil data hungry entity and EU companies are saints.

But fact of the matter is that the US is rapidly sliding into totalitarianism and at the same time US tech companies have an hu huge influence worldwide.

I commend any alternative that comes from outside the US and also offers an “open source” selfhosted option.

krunck 16 hours ago|
Very disappointing. I really get the sense that all AI companies and anti-privacy parasites on society.
More comments...