Top
Best
New

Posted by bbatsell 2 hours ago

Flock used >100 times to track veteran who recorded traffic stop(reason.com)
283 points | 123 commentspage 2
jmclnx 1 hour ago|
Hopefully he gets a big enough payment that makes other jurisdictions remove these cameras.
fhdkweig 1 hour ago|
Hopefully they remove cops who abuse their powers. While I agree that victims require compensation, ultimately these payouts only hurt the taxpayers who have to cover for these cops who at worst just move to another town to do it again.
layer8 1 hour ago||
The fact that the victim is a Navy veteran should be immaterial here. People shouldn’t be any less upset if he wasn’t.
CobaltFire 1 hour ago|
As a veteran I agree, with a significant caveat:

Generally those who support the police in general (especially those with the thin blue line American flag displayed somewhere) espouse support for veterans. The clash of a veteran operating legally with police operating illegally helps foster cognitive dissonance and disentangle these two institutions in their mind.

In other words these types of articles are helpful for causing those individuals to confront the issues in their belief structure.

I use them this way all the time with my parents, as they continue to insist that I (a retired Navy vet) should mindlessly support the police. They are not interested in the LONG history of those two populations clashing.

ksudb 1 hour ago||
[dead]
johnmlussier 1 hour ago|
Don't remove the cameras - make sure they're used legally and bad apples don't ruin a good thing:

Four different places, four different children rescued by use of Flock cameras.

https://kfdm.com/news/local/flock-camera-teamwork-credited-w...

https://www.foxcarolina.com/2026/07/31/kidnapped-mother-son-...

https://www.whsv.com/2026/08/01/deputy-uses-flock-cameras-fi...

https://abc3340.com/news/local/moody-police-say-flock-camera...

Want to track latest on what flock cameras did? https://flockstopscrime.com

FeepingCreature 1 hour ago||
Why not the other way around? First make sure the police department is capable of using them legally and reliably investigating abuse, then we can consider allowing them.
oh_my_goodness 38 minutes ago|||
Absolutely. First let's install an extreme surveillance state and give them full police power unlimited by the Constitution. Then, later, if we have any regrets, no problem. Just restore democracy.
aprilthird2021 1 hour ago|||
But we decided as a country long long long ago that we wouldn't abet abuse, unwarranted search and seizure, and would treat people as innocent until proven guilty even if that meant elevated crime was the price to pay for that
zapataband1 1 hour ago|||
"bad apples" = one rotten apple ruins the bunch.

There are no "good apples" the article itself shows that other "apples" were helping him illegaly surveil. The "good apples" thought it was a good idea to give every apple access to a problematic system.

There are no good apples if there's a rotten in the bunch, we need public oversight of the only people that are allowed to enact violence on behalf of the state.

kotaKat 1 hour ago|||
Nice shitty astroturfing campaign, bro. How much does Flock provide in payola? Five figures and I'll start singing the praises, too, bro.
chuckadams 1 hour ago||
[flagged]
wateralien 1 hour ago||
> make sure they're used legally and bad apples don't ruin a good thing

The unedited comment shows he used it correctly using “and” to mean “so that”.

chuckadams 1 hour ago||
Ah, indeed that is the more likely reading. I stand by the boot bit.