Top
Best
New

Posted by rustywasm 15 hours ago

Watch Los Angeles get built, one building at a time (1880–2026)(lax-skyline.parcelscope.net)
291 points | 143 commentspage 2
socalgal2 10 hours ago|
Interesting visualization. I feel like it's misleading though because the presentation shows only Los Angeles City boundaries, not the area in general. LA City has that strange vertical shaft down the the port so the city could keep the taxes from the port, but the visualization shows the rest of the area as empty, which of course it is not. It also excludes Orange County, Riverside County, and the whole area north, the San Fernando Valley, and those all arguably are just as important to the story. In the end, I think the visualization ends up being a net negative in it's current form since it's very misleading
toyg 14 hours ago||
They paved paradise, and put up a parking lot.
mag7269 14 hours ago||
Paradise? LA was a big giant horrible underdeveloped wasteland in Spanish/Mexican times which, at the time in 1849, had 1,600 residents. Most of them had a largely pastoral life and life was brutal there.

LA under US rule is the prime example of what industrialized people can do to a place that lacked nearly everything of what it is at this moment: a world-class city.

Objectively, if it had stayed under Mexican rule, it’d resemble Yuma at best or Tecate at worst. I should know, my family lineage goes back to that era to both sides of the border.

toyg 13 hours ago|||
One's "underdeveloped wasteland" is someone else's untouched paradise. Particularly someone like Joni Mitchell.
Hnrobert42 13 hours ago||||
Was it that a big, giant, horrible wasteland because it was undeveloped? That is, was there something bad about it other than being undeveloped? Personally, I love living in the city AND land in its natural state.

Also, GP was quoting a song lyric.

rustywasm 13 hours ago||
I think the best intro to LA is Cadillac Desert by Marc Reisner (it's really about the entire West and its relationship to water, but I think the first few chapters explain LA better than many other books.)
thisismyopinion 14 hours ago||||
Funny. It's concrete hell.
esseph 13 hours ago|||
It's part of a very popular song from the 70s by Joni Mitchell called "Big Yellow Taxi".

Counting Crows did a cover in 2002.

lotsofpulp 14 hours ago||
Is there an alternative if 13 million people want to live somewhere?
toyg 13 hours ago||
Somewhat sadly, the reason a lot of the ancestors of those 13 millions moved there was that they wanted an unpaved paradise.

Unfortunately, humans do not know restraint.

andretti1977 4 hours ago||
As an Italian I am always amazed when I remember that cities like LA or San Francisco are just 200yo. Here in Italy (but it’s the same for quite any city in Europe) every city can trace its roots back at least two thousand years.
CorvusCrypto 13 hours ago||
Wow this is inspiring. I would love to see a very similar visualization for Stockholm, Sweden. I think there is a beauty in seeing a summarized history of expansion, and in reality I can't help but think this is a very fast population boom. One I am sure most metro areas would struggle with. Makes a lot of criticism of LA planning in hindsight feel very unfair.
esseph 13 hours ago|
LA county has about the same population as Sweden.
sshussain270 2 hours ago||
Very cool, what ddi you build this with?
enjoyyourlife 15 hours ago||
Nice! Would be better if it shows the difference between the ocean and other land
suncemoje 15 hours ago||
Agree, I personally also think dark mode never goes well with a map-based app...
slg 14 hours ago||
Especially with this sort of map regarding this specific city. For example, Beverly Hills is a separate municipality contained entirely within the borders of Los Angeles. It appears here like an empty black space no different from the ocean, lakes, mountains, and parks also scattered around the city. The styling of this map makes it impossible to tell if an area is truly undeveloped and if so, why. Throw in the way there appears to be arbitrary selection criteria for some buildings outside city limits that make them appear as lone buildings in undeveloped space, and I think it adds up to potentially give people a wrong picture of the area.
rustywasm 14 hours ago||
Yes, good point. The LA City data was rich, but the other communities have data in other places. I will see what I can do.
slg 10 hours ago||
Great, I'm sure getting more data for a complete picture of the area is a huge undertaking, but simply switching to the light map that shows the geography more clearly is a big improvement.
rustywasm 15 hours ago||
Good idea! Let me work on that...
burningChrome 7 hours ago||
Just started reading Shawn Levy's book, "The Castle on Sunset: Life, Death, Love, Art, and Scandal at Hollywood's Chateau Marmont" which relates the history of the hotel, but I found the history of Hollywood and LA fascinating. Its a huge part of the story of the hotel and development of the areas surrounding the hotel.
rustywasm 6 hours ago||
I added LA County data, and checked it against where I group up and where my mother and father grew up. Seems reasonably accurate so far.
sevennull 9 hours ago||
Funny, I built the same thing 9 months ago for Denver, CO - nothing too interesting other than 1 subdivision that exploded in growth over 1-2 years in the 70s. A lot of the older areas around Denver built up pretty quickly.
andai 12 hours ago|
This is super cool. Seems to be quite laggy for me though, when the timeline reached 2026 and stopped, buildings still kept popping in for the next 30 seconds.
rustywasm 12 hours ago|
Yep, that was my misconfiguration of the CloudFlare cache. Hopefully fixed now.
More comments...