Yes, there will be, to deliver two minute hates to the telescreens.

This reminds me of a sign I saw advertising "GLP-2s". Twice as good as GLP-1s!

Ironically for mobile data, I've liked and found 4G to be more consistent. Not always as fast, but it never drops for me or fails to load.

We really need a hybrid short-haul standard designed for short-range transmission. Something that uses low-frequency spectrum currently allocated to 5G but isn't locked to a single carrier and the protocol can be shared between WiFi and Cellular. Staking out some new frequencies would be great too.

Could there come a limit to the G-cycle? Like either a) marginal gains slow/stall progress or b) more connectivity simply not being better? Curious to hear from folks in this field if this question has been raised.

Can't answer this question as I know basically nothing.

I'd be perfectly happy with less headline speed increases and just a real world busy tower speed improvement. That or efficiency gains.

What would RF native computing involve ?

I'm surprised that Starlink didn't try and steal the branding. If anything would count as a new Generation in radio communication...

I'm still waiting for faster SMS. SMPP needs a performance update. This is important everyone.

I sure hope we see 7G one day soon!